• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

体外冲击波碎石术治疗大型肾结石:输尿管支架的作用。一项随机试验。

Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for large renal calculi: the role of ureteral stents. A randomized trial.

作者信息

Bierkens A F, Hendrikx A J, Lemmens W A, Debruyne F M

机构信息

Department of Urology, Radboud University Hospital, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

出版信息

J Urol. 1991 Apr;145(4):699-702. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)38428-8.

DOI:10.1016/s0022-5347(17)38428-8
PMID:2005681
Abstract

Ureteral stents reduce complications after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL*) and contribute to successful stone passage. However, some reports note complications that are attributed to indwelling ureteral stents. We randomized 64 patients with large renal calculi (stone burden more than 200 mm.2) for in situ treatment or treatment with a prophylactically inserted stent. We used a 6Ch round stent with single-coiled ends or a triangular shaped stent with double-coiled ends. Patients were treated with a Siemens Lithostar lithotriptor. After 3 months we evaluated the results of treatment and post-ESWL morbidity. Of the in situ group (23 patients) treatment complications consisted of fever in 3, pyelonephritis in 1 and steinstrasse in 3. After 3 months 8 patients (35%) were free of stones. Of the stented population (41 patients) treatment complications consisted of fever in 7, pyelonephritis in 1, steinstrasse in 6 and bladder discomfort in almost half of the patients. Stent calcification and stent migration were also seen in 7 and 10 patients, respectively. Calcified stents had been in situ longer than noncalcified stents. The round stents migrated and calcified more often than the more rigid triangular stents. After 3 months 18 of the stented patients were stone-free (44%). We conclude that ureteral stents do not reduce post-ESWL complications. They are clearly associated with morbidity and do not improve stone passage markedly. Therefore, patients with a stone burden of more than 200 mm.2 should be treated in situ without auxiliary stenting.

摘要

输尿管支架可减少体外冲击波碎石术(ESWL*)后的并发症,并有助于结石顺利排出。然而,一些报告指出了与留置输尿管支架相关的并发症。我们将64例大肾结石(结石负荷超过200 mm.2)患者随机分为原位治疗组或预防性置入支架治疗组。我们使用了带有单螺旋末端的6Ch圆形支架或带有双螺旋末端的三角形支架。患者接受西门子Lithostar碎石机治疗。3个月后,我们评估了治疗结果和ESWL后的发病率。原位治疗组(23例患者)的治疗并发症包括3例发热、1例肾盂肾炎和3例石街形成。3个月后,8例患者(35%)结石排出。置入支架组(41例患者)的治疗并发症包括7例发热、1例肾盂肾炎、6例石街形成,几乎一半的患者出现膀胱不适。分别有7例和10例患者出现支架钙化和支架移位。钙化支架的原位留置时间比未钙化支架长。圆形支架比更硬的三角形支架更容易移位和钙化。3个月后,置入支架组的18例患者结石排出(44%)。我们得出结论,输尿管支架并不能减少ESWL后的并发症。它们明显与发病率相关,并且不能显著改善结石排出。因此,结石负荷超过200 mm.2的患者应进行原位治疗,无需辅助置入支架。

相似文献

1
Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for large renal calculi: the role of ureteral stents. A randomized trial.体外冲击波碎石术治疗大型肾结石:输尿管支架的作用。一项随机试验。
J Urol. 1991 Apr;145(4):699-702. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)38428-8.
2
[Utility of ureteral stent for stone street after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy].[输尿管支架在体外冲击波碎石术后结石长街中的应用]
Hinyokika Kiyo. 2005 May;51(5):309-14; dicussion 314.
3
Pediatric staghorn calculi: the role of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy monotherapy with special reference to ureteral stenting.小儿鹿角形结石:体外冲击波碎石术单一疗法的作用,特别提及输尿管支架置入术
J Urol. 2003 Feb;169(2):629-33. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000047231.36474.57.
4
Use of ureteral stent in extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for upper urinary calculi: a systematic review and meta-analysis.体外冲击波碎石术治疗上尿路结石中输尿管支架的应用:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Urol. 2011 Oct;186(4):1328-35. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2011.05.073.
5
Use of double-pigtail stents in extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy.双猪尾支架在体外冲击波碎石术中的应用。
J Urol. 1990 Mar;143(3):475-8. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)39993-7.
6
The role of silicone ureteral stents in extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy of large renal calculi.
J Urol. 1988 Jan;139(1):15-7. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)42274-9.
7
Use of internal polyethylene ureteral stents in extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy of staghorn calculi.
Eur Urol. 1987;13(3):174-5. doi: 10.1159/000472767.
8
Place of double-J stents in extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy.双J管在体外冲击波碎石术中的应用
Eur Urol. 1993;23(4):460-2. doi: 10.1159/000474653.
9
Primary extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy of staghorn renal calculi.鹿角形肾结石的初次体外冲击波碎石术
Urol Int. 1992;48(1):71-5. doi: 10.1159/000282300.
10
Treatment of complete staghorn calculi by extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy monotherapy with special reference to internal stenting.体外冲击波碎石术单药治疗完全鹿角形结石并特别提及内支架置入术
J Urol. 1988 Aug;140(2):260-5. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)41578-3.

引用本文的文献

1
Treatment of renal lower pole stones: an update.肾下极结石的治疗:最新进展
Int Braz J Urol. 2022 Jan-Feb;48(1):165-174. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2020.1023.
2
Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for bilateral renal stones: A case report with serious complications that could be avoided.双侧肾结石的体外冲击波碎石术:一例可避免严重并发症的病例报告
Urol Ann. 2018 Oct-Dec;10(4):409-412. doi: 10.4103/UA.UA_69_18.
3
Efficacy of commercialised extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy service: a review of 589 renal stones.商业化体外冲击波碎石术服务的疗效:对589例肾结石的回顾
BMC Urol. 2017 Jul 27;17(1):59. doi: 10.1186/s12894-017-0249-8.
4
Can a brief period of double J stenting improve the outcome of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for renal calculi sized 1 to 2 cm?双 J 管置管短时间留置能否改善 1 至 2cm 肾结石体外冲击波碎石术的治疗效果?
Investig Clin Urol. 2017 Mar;58(2):103-108. doi: 10.4111/icu.2017.58.2.103. Epub 2017 Feb 15.
5
Impact of ureteric stent on outcome of extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy: A propensity score analysis.输尿管支架对体外冲击波碎石术结局的影响:一项倾向评分分析。
Cent European J Urol. 2016;69(2):184-9. doi: 10.5173/ceju.2016.680. Epub 2016 Apr 8.
6
Does ureteral stenting matter for stone size? A retrospectıve analyses of 1361 extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy patients.输尿管支架置入对结石大小有影响吗?对1361例体外冲击波碎石患者的回顾性分析。
Cent European J Urol. 2015;68(3):358-64. doi: 10.5173/ceju.2015.611. Epub 2015 Oct 15.
7
Interleukin-18 and NGAL in assessment of ESWL treatment safety in children with urolithiasis.白细胞介素-18和中性粒细胞明胶酶相关脂质运载蛋白在评估小儿尿石症体外冲击波碎石术治疗安全性中的应用
Cent Eur J Immunol. 2014;39(3):384-91. doi: 10.5114/ceji.2014.45952. Epub 2014 Oct 14.
8
The role of ureteral stents for all ureteroneocystostomies in kidney transplants.输尿管支架在肾移植中所有输尿管膀胱吻合术里的作用。
Int J Organ Transplant Med. 2011;2(2):66-74.
9
Prospective randomized trial comparing shock wave lithotripsy and flexible ureterorenoscopy for lower pole stones smaller than 1 cm.比较冲击波碎石术和软性输尿管肾镜术治疗小于1厘米的下极结石的前瞻性随机试验。
Urolithiasis. 2014 Apr;42(2):127-31. doi: 10.1007/s00240-013-0618-z. Epub 2013 Nov 13.
10
Complications of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for urinary stones: to know and to manage them-a review.体外冲击波碎石治疗尿路结石的并发症:认识与处理——综述
ScientificWorldJournal. 2012;2012:619820. doi: 10.1100/2012/619820. Epub 2012 Mar 12.