Department of Sexual Health and HIV, Central Middlesex Hospital, North West London Hospitals NHS Trust, , London, UK.
Sex Transm Infect. 2014 Feb;90(1):11-3. doi: 10.1136/sextrans-2013-051228. Epub 2013 Sep 24.
Patients attending for sexually transmitted infection (STI)/HIV testing may be at continuing risk of infection and advised to return for retesting at a later date.
To measure the impact of short message service (SMS) text reminders on the reattendance rates of patients who require repeat STI testing.
Reattendance rates were measured for two groups of higher risk patients: those listed for routine SMS text reminders in 2012 and a control group of patients from 2011 with the same risk profile who had not received any active recall. Reattendance was counted if it was within 4 months of the end of the episode of care.
Reattendance rates were not statistically different between the text group 32% (89/274) and the control group 35% (92/266). Reattendance also was not statistically different between the text and control groups respectively in patients with the following risks: recent chlamydia 43/121 (36%) versus 41/123 (33%), recent gonorrhoea 4/21 (19%) versus 7/21 (33%), recent emergency contraception 27/60 (45%) versus 25/56 (45%) and other risks 7/27 (26%) versus 9/26 (35%). High rates of STIs were found in patients who reattended in both the text group (13/90, 14%) and control group (15/91, 17%) and at even higher rates at reattendance if the reason for recall was chlamydia infection at the initial visit: 9/43 (21%) in the text group and 10/41 (24%) in the control group.
SMS texts sent as reminders to patients at higher risk of STIs and HIV did not increase the reattendance rate, when compared with standard advice, in this service which already has a high reattendance rate. STI rates were high in those patients who reattended.
接受性传播感染(STI)/艾滋病毒检测的患者可能持续存在感染风险,并被建议在以后的某个日期重新检测。
测量短信服务(SMS)文本提醒对需要重复 STI 检测的患者再次就诊率的影响。
对两组高危患者的再就诊率进行了测量:2012 年列入常规 SMS 文本提醒名单的患者组和 2011 年未收到任何主动召回的风险状况相同的对照组患者。如果在疗程结束后 4 个月内就诊,则算作再就诊。
文本组的再就诊率为 32%(89/274),对照组为 35%(92/266),两组之间的再就诊率无统计学差异。在以下风险患者中,文本组与对照组之间的再就诊率也无统计学差异:近期衣原体感染 43/121(36%)与 41/123(33%)、近期淋病 4/21(19%)与 7/21(33%)、近期紧急避孕 27/60(45%)与 25/56(45%)和其他风险 7/27(26%)与 9/26(35%)。在文本组(13/90,14%)和对照组(15/91,17%)中,再次就诊的患者中都发现了较高的 STI 率,如果召回的原因是初次就诊时的衣原体感染,那么这种比率甚至更高:文本组为 9/43(21%),对照组为 10/41(24%)。
与标准建议相比,对于已经具有高再就诊率的服务,向感染性传播感染和艾滋病毒风险较高的患者发送短信提醒并不会增加再就诊率。在再次就诊的患者中,性传播感染率较高。