• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

DSM-5 人格量表(PID-5)的信度和效度:预测社区居住的意大利成年人群体中 DSM-IV 人格障碍和精神病态。

Reliability and validity of the personality inventory for DSM-5 (PID-5): predicting DSM-IV personality disorders and psychopathy in community-dwelling Italian adults.

机构信息

LUMSA University, Rome, Italy.

出版信息

Assessment. 2013 Dec;20(6):689-708. doi: 10.1177/1073191113504984. Epub 2013 Sep 24.

DOI:10.1177/1073191113504984
PMID:24065702
Abstract

In order to assess the internal consistency, factor structure, and ability to recover DSM-IV personality disorders (PDs) of the Personality Inventory for DSM-5 (PID-5) scales, 710 Italian adult community dwelling volunteers were administered the Italian translation of the PID-5, as well as the Italian translation of the Personality Diagnostic Questionnaire-4+ (PDQ-4+). Cronbach's alpha values were >.70 for all PID-5 facet scales and greater than .90 for all PID-5 domain scales. Parallel analysis and confirmatory factor analysis supported the theoretical five-factor model of the PID-5 trait scales. Regression analyses showed that both PID-5 trait and domain scales explained a substantial amount of variance in the PDQ-4+ PD scales, with the exception of the Passive-Aggressive PD scale. When the PID-5 was administered to a second independent sample of 389 Italian adult community dwelling volunteers, the basic psychometric properties of the scale were replicated. In this second sample, the PID-5 trait and domain scales proved to be significant predictors of psychopathy measures. As a whole, the results of the present study support the hypothesis that the PID-5 is a reliable instrument which is able to recover DSM-IV PDs, as well as to capture personality pathology that is not included in the DSM-IV (namely, psychopathy).

摘要

为了评估人格障碍诊断问卷 5 修订版(PDQ-5+)量表的内部一致性、因素结构和恢复 DSM-IV 人格障碍(PD)的能力,710 名意大利成年社区居民志愿者接受了 PDQ-5+的意大利语翻译以及人格障碍诊断问卷 4+(PDQ-4+)的意大利语翻译。PDQ-5+的所有方面量表的克朗巴赫 α 值均大于.70,所有 PDQ-5 域量表的克朗巴赫 α 值均大于.90。并行分析和验证性因子分析支持 PDQ-5 特质量表的五因素理论模型。回归分析表明,PDQ-5 特质和域量表都解释了 PDQ-4+PD 量表的大量变异,除了被动攻击 PD 量表。当 PD-5 被施用于第二组 389 名意大利成年社区居民志愿者时,该量表的基本心理测量特性得以复制。在第二组样本中,PD-5 特质和域量表被证明是精神变态测量的显著预测指标。总的来说,本研究的结果支持以下假设:PD-5 是一种可靠的工具,能够恢复 DSM-IV PD,以及捕捉 DSM-IV 中未包含的人格病理(即精神变态)。

相似文献

1
Reliability and validity of the personality inventory for DSM-5 (PID-5): predicting DSM-IV personality disorders and psychopathy in community-dwelling Italian adults.DSM-5 人格量表(PID-5)的信度和效度:预测社区居住的意大利成年人群体中 DSM-IV 人格障碍和精神病态。
Assessment. 2013 Dec;20(6):689-708. doi: 10.1177/1073191113504984. Epub 2013 Sep 24.
2
Item Response Theory Analyses, Factor Structure, and External Correlates of the Italian Translation of the Personality Inventory for Short Form in Community-Dwelling Adults and Clinical Adults.人格特质简明问卷意大利文翻译版在社区居住成年人和临床成年人中的项目反应理论分析、因子结构和外部关联。
Assessment. 2019 Jul;26(5):839-852. doi: 10.1177/1073191118781006. Epub 2018 Jun 14.
3
The psychometric properties of the personality inventory for DSM-5 in an APA DSM-5 field trial sample.DSM-5 人格量表在 APA DSM-5 现场试验样本中的心理计量特性。
Assessment. 2013 Jun;20(3):362-9. doi: 10.1177/1073191113486183. Epub 2013 Apr 15.
4
Reliability and clinical usefulness of the personality inventory for DSM-5 in clinically referred adolescents: A preliminary report in a sample of Italian inpatients.DSM-5 人格问卷在临床转诊青少年中的信度和临床实用性:意大利住院患者样本的初步报告。
Compr Psychiatry. 2016 Oct;70:141-51. doi: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2016.07.006. Epub 2016 Jul 21.
5
A Head-to-Head Comparison of the Personality Inventory for DSM-5 (PID-5) With the Personality Diagnostic Questionnaire-4 (PDQ-4) in Predicting the General Level of Personality Pathology Among Community Dwelling Subjects.DSM-5人格问卷(PID-5)与人格诊断问卷-4(PDQ-4)在预测社区居住人群人格病理总体水平方面的直接比较
J Pers Disord. 2016 Feb;30(1):82-94. doi: 10.1521/pedi_2015_29_184.
6
The Personality Inventory for DSM-5 Brief Form: Evidence for Reliability and Construct Validity in a Sample of Community-Dwelling Italian Adolescents.《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第5版简版人格量表:意大利社区青少年样本中的信度和结构效度证据
Assessment. 2017 Jul;24(5):615-631. doi: 10.1177/1073191115621793. Epub 2015 Dec 16.
7
A five-factor model perspective on psychopathy and comorbid Axis-II disorders in a forensic-psychiatric sample.从五因素模型角度看法医精神病学样本中的精神病态与共病的轴II障碍
Int J Law Psychiatry. 2008 Oct-Nov;31(5):394-406. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2008.08.008. Epub 2008 Sep 13.
8
The DSM-5 alternative model of personality disorders from the perspective of adult attachment: a study in community-dwelling adults.从成人依恋视角看《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第5版人格障碍替代模型:一项针对社区居住成年人的研究
J Nerv Ment Dis. 2015 Apr;203(4):252-8. doi: 10.1097/NMD.0000000000000274.
9
Reliability, Factor Structure, and Associations With Measures of Problem Relationship and Behavior of the Personality Inventory for DSM-5 in a Sample of Italian Community-Dwelling Adolescents.意大利社区居住青少年样本中《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第5版人格量表的信度、因子结构及其与问题关系和行为测量指标的关联
J Pers Disord. 2017 Oct;31(5):624-646. doi: 10.1521/pedi_2017_31_272. Epub 2017 Jan 10.
10
[An exploratory study of a personality disorders questionnaire].[一项人格障碍问卷的探索性研究]
Encephale. 2008 Oct;34(5):517-25. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2007.08.006. Epub 2007 Dec 26.

引用本文的文献

1
The validity, reliability and clinical utility of the Alternative DSM-5 Model for Personality Disorders (AMPD) according to DSM-5 revision criteria.根据《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第5版修订标准,人格障碍替代模型(AMPD)的有效性、可靠性和临床实用性。
World Psychiatry. 2025 Oct;24(3):319-340. doi: 10.1002/wps.21339.
2
Predicting Engagement With Conversational Agents in Mental Health Therapy by Examining the Role of Epistemic Trust, Personality, and Fear of Intimacy: Cross-Sectional Web-Based Survey Study.通过审视认知信任、人格和亲密关系恐惧的作用预测心理健康治疗中与对话代理的互动:基于网络的横断面调查研究
JMIR Hum Factors. 2025 Jul 30;12:e70698. doi: 10.2196/70698.
3
Personality Inventory for the DSM-5 trait correlates with self-reported acts of rape.
《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第五版人格量表特质与自我报告的强奸行为相关。
Curr Issues Personal Psychol. 2024 Jun 18;13(1):18-25. doi: 10.5114/cipp/185625. eCollection 2025.
4
Person-Centered Associations between High- and Low-Risk Personality Profiles and Psychological Adjustment in University Students.大学生中高风险和低风险人格特征与心理调适之间以人为主的关联
Depress Anxiety. 2024 Mar 26;2024:8810153. doi: 10.1155/2024/8810153. eCollection 2024.
5
Preliminary Development and Validation of the Inventory of Goals and Anti-Goals.目标与反目标量表的初步编制与验证
Clin Neuropsychiatry. 2025 Feb;22(1):99-108. doi: 10.36131/cnfioritieditore20250108.
6
A Meta-Analysis of the Structural Validity of Original and Brief Versions of the Personality Inventory for DSM-5 in Iran.伊朗版《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第5版人格量表原始版与简版结构效度的Meta分析
Iran J Psychiatry. 2025 Jan;20(1):126-141. doi: 10.18502/ijps.v20i1.17406.
7
Transgender and Gender Diverse Patients Are Diagnosed with Borderline Personality Disorder More Frequently Than Cisgender Patients Regardless of Personality Pathology.无论人格病理学情况如何,跨性别和性别多样化患者被诊断为边缘性人格障碍的频率都高于顺性别患者。
Transgend Health. 2024 Dec 16;9(6):554-565. doi: 10.1089/trgh.2023.0062. eCollection 2024 Dec.
8
Why does perceived parenting in adolescence predict maladaptive personality in adulthood? Evidence for substantial genetic mediation.为何青少年期所感受到的养育方式能预测成年后的适应不良型人格?基因在其中起重要中介作用的证据。
Dev Psychopathol. 2024 Sep 19:1-10. doi: 10.1017/S0954579424001329.
9
Examining a Fully Automated Mobile-Based Behavioral Activation Intervention in Depression: Randomized Controlled Trial.基于手机的全自动行为激活干预在抑郁症中的应用研究:一项随机对照试验。
JMIR Ment Health. 2024 Aug 30;11:e54252. doi: 10.2196/54252.
10
Metacognition as a transdiagnostic factor across eating disorders: a latent profile analysis study.元认知作为进食障碍的一个跨诊断因素:一项潜在类别分析研究。
Front Psychol. 2024 Jun 24;15:1391715. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1391715. eCollection 2024.