Femia Giuseppe, Federico Isabella, Rogier Guyonne, D'Olimpio Francesca, Mancini Francesco, Gragnani Andrea
School of Cognitive Psychotherapy, Rome, Italy.
Department of Educational Sciences, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy.
Clin Neuropsychiatry. 2025 Feb;22(1):99-108. doi: 10.36131/cnfioritieditore20250108.
The clinical and empirical investigation of the role of investment in goals and anti-goals is limited by the lack of an easy-to-use tool. This is critical, as psychopathology, and specifically pathological personality, is characterized by an overinvestment in goals and anti-goals, rigidity in these investments and, consequently, by a poor existential plan that generates suffering and resistance to change. To develop a preliminary version of a self-report questionnaire measuring investment levels in goals and anti-goals, described as core features of the most common psychopathological conditions. To test the factorial structure of the tool and examine preliminary data on its construct validity.
The Inventory of Goals and Anti-Goals (IGAG) was developed. A total of 572 participants (Mage= 33.05 years; SD= 10.01; 61.62 % females), including community participants (n =424) and patients (n =148), was asked to complete a battery of questionnaires including the IGAG, the Personality Inventory for DSM-5 and the Symptom-Checklist-90-Revised. Exploratory factor analysis, Mann-Whitney U tests and correlations were computed.
Analyses identified an eight-factor structure and significant differences between groups on several factors. IGAG scores were largely significantly and positively correlated with the PID-5 and SCL-90-R in the expected directions.
The IGAG appears to be a promising instrument for both research and clinical practice. Results suggest a strong relationship between overinvestment in goals and anti-goals and psychopathology. Several limitations necessitate future modifications of its content and additional efforts for validation.
由于缺乏一种易于使用的工具,对目标和反目标投入的作用进行临床和实证研究受到限制。这一点至关重要,因为精神病理学,尤其是病理性人格,其特征在于对目标和反目标过度投入、在这些投入方面的僵化,以及由此产生的糟糕的生存计划,进而导致痛苦和对改变的抗拒。开发一份自我报告问卷的初步版本,用以测量目标和反目标的投入水平,这些被描述为最常见精神病理状况的核心特征。检验该工具的因子结构,并检查其结构效度的初步数据。
编制了目标与反目标量表(IGAG)。共有572名参与者(年龄均值=33.05岁;标准差=10.01;61.62%为女性),包括社区参与者(n =424)和患者(n =148),被要求完成一系列问卷,包括IGAG、《精神障碍诊断与统计手册》第5版人格量表和症状自评量表90修订版。进行了探索性因子分析、曼-惠特尼U检验和相关性计算。
分析确定了一个八因子结构,且在几个因子上组间存在显著差异。IGAG得分在预期方向上与PID-5和SCL-90-R在很大程度上显著正相关。
IGAG似乎是一种在研究和临床实践中都很有前景的工具。结果表明,对目标和反目标的过度投入与精神病理学之间存在密切关系。一些局限性需要在未来对其内容进行修改,并进一步努力进行验证。