Rodriguez-Seijas Craig, Morgan Theresa A, Zimmerman Mark
Department of Psychology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Department of Psychiatry and Human Behavior, Warren Alpert Medical School, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, USA.
Transgend Health. 2024 Dec 16;9(6):554-565. doi: 10.1089/trgh.2023.0062. eCollection 2024 Dec.
Borderline personality disorder (BPD) is a severe form of psychopathology associated with a host of negative outcomes. Some literature suggests elevated prevalence among transgender and gender diverse (TGD) samples. Elevated BPD prevalence among TGD populations could be due to factors other than BPD-specific psychopathology. Studies of TGD samples typically omit assessment of BPD, making it difficult to understand elevated BPD diagnosis. The current study explored (1) differences in BPD diagnosis among TGD patients versus cisgender patients, (2) if differences were explained by BPD-specific pathology, and (3) if BPD diagnostic disparities existed based on assessment modality.
Data from TGD (=74) and cisgender heterosexual (=920) patients who presented for treatment at one partial hospitalization program from 2014 to 2019 were compared to investigate differences in the frequency of BPD diagnosis.
A larger proportion of TGD patients were diagnosed with BPD than cisgender patients (odds ratio [OR]=4.05, <0.001). The disparity in diagnosis persisted even after controlling for BPD-specific personality pathology (OR=2.98, <0.001). BPD diagnostic disparity occurred when assessed using structured (OR=4.78, <0.001) and unstructured (OR=3.61, <0.001) interview methods. There was no disparity, however, when BPD was diagnosed using an algorithm based on BPD-specific personality pathology purported to underlie the diagnosis.
Clinical providers appear inclined to assign a BPD diagnosis to TGD patients that may not correspond with group differences in underlying personality pathology. That some BPD symptoms might be more likely in TGD samples, future research can examine criterion-level biases in BPD diagnosis among TGD individuals.
边缘性人格障碍(BPD)是一种严重的精神病理学形式,与一系列负面结果相关。一些文献表明,在跨性别和性别多样化(TGD)样本中,其患病率有所升高。TGD人群中BPD患病率升高可能是由于BPD特异性精神病理学以外的因素。对TGD样本的研究通常省略了BPD评估,这使得难以理解BPD诊断率升高的原因。本研究探讨了(1)TGD患者与顺性别患者在BPD诊断上的差异,(2)这些差异是否由BPD特异性病理学解释,以及(3)基于评估方式是否存在BPD诊断差异。
比较了2014年至2019年在一个部分住院治疗项目中接受治疗的TGD患者(n = 74)和顺性别异性恋患者(n = 920)的数据,以调查BPD诊断频率的差异。
与顺性别患者相比,TGD患者被诊断为BPD的比例更高(优势比[OR]=4.05,P<0.001)。即使在控制了BPD特异性人格病理学因素后,诊断差异仍然存在(OR = 2.98,P<0.001)。使用结构化(OR = 4.78,P<0.001)和非结构化(OR = 3.61,P<0.001)访谈方法进行评估时,均出现了BPD诊断差异。然而,当使用基于据称是BPD诊断基础的BPD特异性人格病理学的算法进行BPD诊断时,没有差异。
临床医生似乎倾向于给TGD患者做出BPD诊断,这可能与潜在人格病理学的群体差异不相符。鉴于TGD样本中某些BPD症状可能更常见,未来的研究可以检查TGD个体在BPD诊断中的标准水平偏差。