Suppr超能文献

43 个欧洲国家卫生政策绩效的比较分析。

A comparative analysis of health policy performance in 43 European countries.

机构信息

Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Eur J Public Health. 2013 Apr;23(2):195-201. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/cks192. Epub 2013 Feb 11.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

It is unknown whether European countries differ systematically in their pursuit of health policies, and what the determinants of these differences are. In this article, we assess the extent to which European countries vary in the implementation of health policies in 10 different areas, and we exploit these variations to investigate the role of political, economic and social determinants of health policy.

DATA AND METHODS

We reviewed policies in the field of tobacco; alcohol; food and nutrition; fertility, pregnancy and childbirth; child health; infectious diseases; hypertension detection and treatment; cancer screening; road safety and air pollution. We developed a set of 27 'process' and 'outcome' indicators, as well as a summary score indicating a country's overall success in implementing effective health policies. In exploratory regression analyses, we related these indicators to six background factors: national income, survival/self-expression values, democracy, government effectiveness, left-party participation in government and ethnic fractionalization.

RESULTS

We found striking variations between European countries in process and outcome indicators of health policies. On the whole, Sweden, Norway and Iceland perform best, and Ukraine, Russian Federation and Armenia perform worst. Within Western Europe, some countries, such as Denmark and Belgium, perform significantly worse than their neighbours. Survival/self-expression values and ethnic fractionalization were the main predictors of the health policy performance summary score. National income, survival/self-expression values and government effectiveness were the main predictors of countries' performance in specific areas of health policy.

CONCLUSIONS

Although many new preventive interventions have been developed, their implementation appears to have varied enormously among European countries. Substantial health gains can be achieved if all countries would follow best practice, but this probably requires the removal of barriers related to both the 'will' and the 'means' to implement health policies.

摘要

背景

目前尚不清楚欧洲各国在实施卫生政策方面是否存在系统性差异,以及这些差异的决定因素是什么。在本文中,我们评估了欧洲各国在 10 个不同领域实施卫生政策的程度,并利用这些差异来研究政治、经济和社会健康政策决定因素的作用。

数据和方法

我们审查了烟草、酒精、食品和营养、生育、怀孕和分娩、儿童健康、传染病、高血压检测和治疗、癌症筛查、道路安全和空气污染领域的政策。我们制定了一套 27 个“过程”和“结果”指标,以及一个综合得分,以表明一个国家在实施有效卫生政策方面的总体成功程度。在探索性回归分析中,我们将这些指标与六个背景因素联系起来:国民收入、生存/自我表达价值观、民主、政府效能、左翼政党在政府中的参与度和族群分裂。

结果

我们发现,欧洲国家在卫生政策的过程和结果指标方面存在显著差异。总体而言,瑞典、挪威和冰岛表现最好,乌克兰、俄罗斯联邦和亚美尼亚表现最差。在西欧内部,一些国家,如丹麦和比利时,其表现明显逊于邻国。生存/自我表达价值观和族群分裂是卫生政策绩效综合得分的主要预测因素。国民收入、生存/自我表达价值观和政府效能是国家在卫生政策特定领域表现的主要预测因素。

结论

尽管已经开发出许多新的预防干预措施,但它们在欧洲各国的实施情况似乎存在巨大差异。如果所有国家都遵循最佳实践,就可以实现实质性的健康收益,但这可能需要消除与实施卫生政策的“意愿”和“手段”相关的障碍。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验