• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

创伤功能指数(FIX-IT)的制定与初步验证。

Development and preliminary validation of a Function IndeX for Trauma (FIX-IT).

机构信息

The Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Department of Surgery, and the Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario.

出版信息

Can J Surg. 2013 Oct;56(5):E114-20. doi: 10.1503/cjs.004312.

DOI:10.1503/cjs.004312
PMID:24067526
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3788020/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Assessing fracture healing in clinical trials is subjective. The new Function IndeX for Trauma (FIX-IT) score provides a simple, standardized approach to assess weight-bearing and pain in patients with lower extremity fractures. We conducted an initial validation of the FIX-IT score.

METHODS

We conducted a cross-sectional study involving 50 patients with lower extremity fractures across different stages of healing to evaluate the reliability and preliminary validity of the FIX-IT score. Patients were independently examined by 2 orthopedic surgeons, 1 orthopedic fellow, 2 orthopedic residents and 2 research coordinators. Patients also completed the Short Form-36 version 2 (SF-36v2) questionnaire, and convergent validity was tested with the SF-36v2.

RESULTS

For interrater reliability, the intraclass correlation coefficients ranged from 0.637 to 0.915. The overall interrater reliability for the total FIX-IT score was 0.879 (95% confidence interval 0.828-0.921). The correlations between the FIX-IT score and the SF-36 ranged from 0.682 to 0.770 for the physical component summary score, from 0.681 to 0.758 for the physical function subscale, and from 0.677 to 0.786 for the role-physical subscale.

CONCLUSION

The FIX-IT score had high interrater agreement across multiple examiners. Moreover, FIX-IT scores correlate with the physical scores of the SF-36. Although additional research is needed to fully validate FIX-IT, our results suggest the potential for FIX-IT to be a reliable adjunctive clinician measure to evaluate healing in lower extremity fractures.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Diagnostic Study Level I.

摘要

背景

临床试验中评估骨折愈合情况具有主观性。新型创伤功能指数(Function IndeX for Trauma,FIX-IT)评分提供了一种简单、标准化的方法,用于评估下肢骨折患者的负重和疼痛情况。我们对 FIX-IT 评分进行了初步验证。

方法

我们进行了一项横断面研究,纳入了 50 例不同愈合阶段的下肢骨折患者,以评估 FIX-IT 评分的可靠性和初步有效性。由 2 名骨科医生、1 名骨科住院医师、2 名骨科住院医师和 2 名研究协调员对患者进行独立检查。患者还完成了简明健康状况调查问卷 36 版(Short Form-36 version 2,SF-36v2)问卷,并用 SF-36v2 测试了其收敛效度。

结果

对于组内一致性,组内相关系数范围为 0.637 至 0.915。总 FIX-IT 评分的总体组内一致性为 0.879(95%置信区间为 0.828-0.921)。FIX-IT 评分与 SF-36 的相关性在生理成分综合评分中为 0.682 至 0.770,在生理功能子量表中为 0.681 至 0.758,在身体角色子量表中为 0.677 至 0.786。

结论

FIX-IT 评分在多名检查者之间具有较高的组内一致性。此外,FIX-IT 评分与 SF-36 的生理评分相关。尽管还需要进一步的研究来充分验证 FIX-IT,但我们的结果表明,FIX-IT 有可能成为一种可靠的辅助临床医生评估下肢骨折愈合情况的工具。

证据等级

诊断研究,I 级。

相似文献

1
Development and preliminary validation of a Function IndeX for Trauma (FIX-IT).创伤功能指数(FIX-IT)的制定与初步验证。
Can J Surg. 2013 Oct;56(5):E114-20. doi: 10.1503/cjs.004312.
2
Measuring illness beliefs in patients with lower extremity injuries: reliability and validity of the Dutch version of the Somatic Pre-Occupation and Coping questionnaire (SPOC-NL).测量下肢损伤患者的疾病认知:荷兰版躯体先占观念与应对问卷(SPOC-NL)的信效度
Injury. 2015 Feb;46(2):308-14. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2014.08.042. Epub 2014 Sep 16.
3
Reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the lower extremity measure for patients with a hip fracture.髋部骨折患者下肢测量的可靠性、有效性和反应性。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2000 Jul;82-A(7):955-62. doi: 10.2106/00004623-200007000-00007.
4
Reliability, validity, and minimal detectable change of the push-off test scores in assessing upper extremity weight-bearing ability.评估上肢负重能力的蹬离测试得分的可靠性、有效性和最小可检测变化。
J Hand Ther. 2019 Jan-Mar;32(1):103-109. doi: 10.1016/j.jht.2017.09.008.
5
Crosscultural Adaptation and Validation of the Korean Version of the New Knee Society Knee Scoring System.新版膝关节协会膝关节评分系统韩文版的跨文化调适与验证
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017 Jun;475(6):1629-1639. doi: 10.1007/s11999-017-5307-8. Epub 2017 Mar 6.
6
Simplified Chinese Version of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire: Cross-cultural Adaptation, Reliability, and Validity for Patients With Low Back Pain.日本矫形协会腰痛评估问卷简体中文版:腰痛患者的跨文化适应性、信度和效度。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2018 Mar 15;43(6):E357-E364. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000002424.
7
Validation of a Women's Sexual Interest Diagnostic Interview--Short Form (WSID-SF) and a Daily Log of Sexual Activities (DLSA) in postmenopausal women with hypoactive sexual desire disorder.验证女性性兴趣诊断访谈-简短版(WSID-SF)和绝经后低性欲障碍女性的性活动日常记录(DLSA)。
J Sex Med. 2010 Feb;7(2 Pt 2):917-27. doi: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2009.01528.x. Epub 2009 Oct 14.
8
Translation, cultural adaptation, validity and reliability of the Turkish ASES questionnaire.土耳其 ASES 问卷的翻译、文化调适、有效性和可靠性。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2013 Sep;21(9):2184-9. doi: 10.1007/s00167-012-2183-3. Epub 2012 Aug 30.
9
The Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS): scale development, measurement properties, and clinical application. North American Orthopaedic Rehabilitation Research Network.下肢功能量表(LEFS):量表的开发、测量特性及临床应用。北美骨科康复研究网络。
Phys Ther. 1999 Apr;79(4):371-83.
10
Radiographic union score for hip substantially improves agreement between surgeons and radiologists.髋关节影像学愈合评分显著提高了外科医生和放射科医生之间的一致性。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2013 Feb 25;14:70. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-14-70.

引用本文的文献

1
Deep behavioral phenotyping tracks functional recovery following tibia fracture in mice.深度行为表型分析追踪小鼠胫骨骨折后的功能恢复情况。
Front Physiol. 2025 Aug 26;16:1630155. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2025.1630155. eCollection 2025.
2
Prospective first-in-human clinical investigation to evaluate the safety of the fracture monitor T1 in patients with femur fractures treated with a locking compression plate: a study protocol.评估骨折监测仪T1在接受锁定加压钢板治疗的股骨骨折患者中的安全性的前瞻性首次人体临床研究:一项研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2025 Jul 30;15(7):e102749. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2025-102749.
3
GO-Tibia: a masked, randomized control trial evaluating gentamicin versus saline in open tibia fractures.GO-Tibia:一项评价开放性胫骨骨折中庆大霉素与生理盐水的对照试验。
Trials. 2023 Jun 15;24(1):406. doi: 10.1186/s13063-023-07410-0.
4
The Effect of Vitamin D Supplementation for Bone Healing in Fracture Patients: A Systematic Review.补充维生素D对骨折患者骨愈合的影响:一项系统评价
Adv Orthop. 2023 Feb 28;2023:6236045. doi: 10.1155/2023/6236045. eCollection 2023.
5
Effect of Vitamin D Supplementation on Acute Fracture Healing: A Phase II Screening Randomized Double-Blind Controlled Trial.补充维生素D对急性骨折愈合的影响:一项II期筛选随机双盲对照试验。
JBMR Plus. 2022 Dec 22;7(1):e10705. doi: 10.1002/jbm4.10705. eCollection 2023 Jan.
6
Bone turnover markers as surrogates of fracture healing after intramedullary fixation of tibia and femur fractures.骨转换标志物作为胫骨干骨折和股骨干骨折髓内固定术后骨折愈合的替代指标。
Bone Joint Res. 2022 Apr;11(4):239-250. doi: 10.1302/2046-3758.114.BJR-2021-0226.R1.
7
A study protocol for a Pilot Masked, Randomized Controlled Trial Evaluating Locally-applied Gentamicin versus Saline in Open Tibia Fractures (pGO-Tibia) in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.坦桑尼亚达累斯萨拉姆一项评估局部应用庆大霉素与生理盐水治疗开放性胫骨骨折(pGO-Tibia)的初步双盲随机对照试验的研究方案
Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2021 Feb 10;7(1):47. doi: 10.1186/s40814-021-00766-7.
8
Study protocol: design and rationale for an exploratory phase II randomized controlled trial to determine optimal vitamin D supplementation strategies for acute fracture healing.研究方案:一项探索性II期随机对照试验的设计与原理,以确定急性骨折愈合的最佳维生素D补充策略。
Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2019 Nov 22;5:135. doi: 10.1186/s40814-019-0524-4. eCollection 2019.

本文引用的文献

1
Outcomes assessment in fracture healing trials: a primer.骨折愈合试验中的结局评估:入门介绍。
J Orthop Trauma. 2010 Mar;24 Suppl 1:S71-5. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e3181ca3fbd.
2
Variability in the assessment of fracture-healing in orthopaedic trauma studies.骨科创伤研究中骨折愈合评估的变异性。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008 Sep;90(9):1862-8. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.G.01580.
3
Outcome assessment in clinical trials of fracture-healing.骨折愈合临床试验中的结果评估。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008 Feb;90 Suppl 1:62-7. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.G.01556.
4
Weight bearing after tibial fracture as a guide to healing.胫骨骨折后的负重情况作为愈合的指导。
Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2008 Mar;23(3):329-33. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2007.09.013. Epub 2007 Nov 7.
5
Guide to outcomes instruments for musculoskeletal trauma research.肌肉骨骼创伤研究结果指标指南
J Orthop Trauma. 2006 Sep;20(8 Suppl):S1-146.
6
Functional outcome after treatment of lower-extremity nonunions.下肢骨不连治疗后的功能结果。
J Trauma. 2005 Feb;58(2):312-7. doi: 10.1097/01.ta.0000154302.23143.63.
7
Health-related quality of life following operative treatment of unstable ankle fractures: a prospective observational study.不稳定型踝关节骨折手术治疗后的健康相关生活质量:一项前瞻性观察研究。
J Orthop Trauma. 2004 Jul;18(6):338-45. doi: 10.1097/00005131-200407000-00002.
8
A lack of consensus in the assessment of fracture healing among orthopaedic surgeons.骨科医生在骨折愈合评估方面缺乏共识。
J Orthop Trauma. 2002 Sep;16(8):562-6. doi: 10.1097/00005131-200209000-00004.
9
Late outcome of isolated tibial fractures treated by intramedullary nailing: the correlation between disease-specific and generic outcome measures.髓内钉治疗单纯胫骨骨折的远期疗效:疾病特异性与通用疗效指标之间的相关性
J Orthop Trauma. 2002 Apr;16(4):245-9. doi: 10.1097/00005131-200204000-00005.
10
Planning a reproducibility study: how many subjects and how many replicates per subject for an expected width of the 95 per cent confidence interval of the intraclass correlation coefficient.规划一项可重复性研究:为使组内相关系数的95%置信区间达到预期宽度,需要多少受试者以及每个受试者需要多少重复测量。
Stat Med. 2001 Nov 15;20(21):3205-14. doi: 10.1002/sim.935.