Department of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia2Department of Dermatology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
JAMA Dermatol. 2013 Nov;149(11):1325-33. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2013.6812.
Millions of surgical and minimally invasive cosmetic procedures of the face are performed each year, but objective clinical measures that evaluate surgical procedures, such as complication rates, have limited utility when applied to cosmetic procedures. While there may be subjective improvements in appearance, it is important to determine if these interventions have an impact on patients in other realms such as psychosocial functioning. This is particularly important in light of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act and its emphasis on patient-centered outcomes and effectiveness.
To review the literature investigating the impact of facial cosmetic surgery and minimally invasive procedures on relevant psychological variables to guide clinical practice and set norms for clinical performance.
English-language randomized clinical trials and prospective cohort studies that preoperatively and postoperatively assessed psychological variables in at least 10 patients seeking surgical or minimally invasive cosmetic procedures of the face.
Only 1 study investigating minimally invasive procedures was identified. Most studies reported modest improvement in psychosocial functioning, which included quality of life, self-esteem, and body image. Unfortunately, the overall quality of evidence is limited owing to an absence of control groups, short follow-up periods, or loss to follow-up.
The current literature suggests that a number of psychosocial domains may improve following facial cosmetic surgery, although the quality of this evidence is limited (grade of recommendation 2A). Despite the dramatic rise in nonsurgical cosmetic procedures, there is a paucity of information regarding the impact of chemodenervation and soft-tissue augmentation on psychosocial functioning.
每年都有数百万例面部手术和微创美容程序,但评估手术程序(如并发症发生率)的客观临床指标在应用于美容程序时具有有限的实用性。虽然外观可能会有主观上的改善,但重要的是要确定这些干预措施是否会对患者在社交心理功能等其他领域产生影响。考虑到《患者保护与平价医疗法案》及其对以患者为中心的结果和效果的重视,这一点尤为重要。
综述调查面部整容手术和微创程序对面部整容手术和微创程序相关心理变量影响的文献,以指导临床实践并为临床表现制定规范。
仅确定了一项针对微创程序的研究。大多数研究报告了社交心理功能的适度改善,包括生活质量、自尊和身体形象。不幸的是,由于缺乏对照组、随访时间短或随访丢失,整体证据质量有限。
目前的文献表明,许多社交心理领域可能会在面部整容手术后得到改善,尽管这方面的证据质量有限(推荐等级 2A)。尽管非手术美容程序急剧增加,但关于化学神经切断术和软组织填充对社交心理功能的影响的信息却很少。