• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

加纳阿苏奥亚曼地区女性现代避孕方法的使用情况:可靠性比健康问题更重要吗?

Modern contraceptive use among women in the Asuogyaman district of Ghana: is reliability more important than health concerns?

作者信息

Teye Joseph Kofi

机构信息

Department of Geography and Resource Development, University of Ghana, Accra, Ghana.

出版信息

Afr J Reprod Health. 2013 Jun;17(2):58-71.

PMID:24069752
Abstract

This study examines the socio-demographic determinants of modern contraceptive use among women in the Asuogyaman district of Ghana. The results reveal that although 97% of the survey respondents knew of at least one modern method of contraception, only 16% of them were using modern contraceptives. Statistical tests show that level of education, place of residence, and work status significantly influence modern contraceptive use among women in the study area. Fear of side effects, desire for more children, and partner's disapproval were the main barriers to modern contraceptive use in the study area. The use of traditional methods of contraception was very high because of the perception that they are safer. Based on these findings, it has been suggested that in addition to making family planning services available and accessible, health workers must address attitudinal factors such as fear of side effects and high fertility preferences.

摘要

本研究调查了加纳阿苏奥亚曼地区女性使用现代避孕方法的社会人口学决定因素。结果显示,尽管97%的调查受访者知晓至少一种现代避孕方法,但其中只有16%的人在使用现代避孕措施。统计测试表明,教育水平、居住地点和工作状况对研究区域内女性使用现代避孕方法有显著影响。对副作用的恐惧、想要更多孩子的愿望以及伴侣的反对是研究区域内使用现代避孕方法的主要障碍。由于认为传统避孕方法更安全,其使用率非常高。基于这些发现,有人建议,除了提供和普及计划生育服务外,卫生工作者还必须解决诸如对副作用的恐惧和高生育偏好等态度因素。

相似文献

1
Modern contraceptive use among women in the Asuogyaman district of Ghana: is reliability more important than health concerns?加纳阿苏奥亚曼地区女性现代避孕方法的使用情况:可靠性比健康问题更重要吗?
Afr J Reprod Health. 2013 Jun;17(2):58-71.
2
Contraceptive behavior in Ghana: a two-sex model.加纳的避孕行为:一种两性模型。
Int J Sociol Fam. 1995 Spring;25(1):43-61.
3
Ghana 1993: results from the Demographic and Health Survey.加纳1993年:人口与健康调查结果。
Stud Fam Plann. 1995 Jul-Aug;26(4):245-9.
4
The impact of women's employment and education on contraceptive use and abortion in Kinshasa, Zaire.扎伊尔金沙萨妇女就业与教育对避孕措施使用及堕胎的影响。
Stud Fam Plann. 1994 Mar-Apr;25(2):96-110.
5
Contraceptive use by women in Accra, Ghana: results from the 2003 Accra Women's Health Survey.加纳阿克拉女性的避孕措施使用情况:2003年阿克拉女性健康调查结果
Afr J Reprod Health. 2009 Mar;13(1):123-33.
6
Who is being served least by family planning providers? A study of modern contraceptive use in Ghana, Tanzania And Zimbabwe.计划生育服务提供者服务最少的人群是谁?一项关于加纳、坦桑尼亚和津巴布韦现代避孕方法使用情况的研究。
Afr J Reprod Health. 2004 Aug;8(2):124-36.
7
Barriers to modern contraceptive use in rural Peru.秘鲁农村地区现代避孕措施使用的障碍。
Stud Fam Plann. 1986 Nov-Dec;17(6 Pt 1):308-16.
8
Modern contraceptive use among women of reproductive age in Ghana: analysis of the 2003-2014 Ghana Demographic and Health Surveys.加纳育龄妇女现代避孕方法的使用情况:对2003 - 2014年加纳人口与健康调查的分析
BMC Womens Health. 2018 Aug 20;18(1):141. doi: 10.1186/s12905-018-0634-9.
9
Socio-economic and cultural differentials in contraceptive usage among Ghanaian women.加纳女性在避孕措施使用方面的社会经济和文化差异。
Int J Sociol Fam. 1990 Autumn;20(2):139-61.
10
Socio-demographic characteristics of family planning clients and their possible influence on contraception in Malawi.马拉维计划生育服务对象的社会人口学特征及其对避孕措施的潜在影响。
East Afr Med J. 1998 Jan;75(1):41-6.

引用本文的文献

1
Perceptions of women and their partners on postabortion intrauterine contraception: A qualitative study in central Uganda.乌干达中部地区女性及其伴侣对堕胎后宫内避孕的看法:一项定性研究
PLoS One. 2025 Jun 25;20(6):e0316982. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0316982. eCollection 2025.
2
Addressing barriers to accessing family planning services using mobile technology intervention among internally displaced persons in Abuja, Nigeria.在尼日利亚阿布贾,利用移动技术干预解决境内流离失所者获取计划生育服务的障碍。
AJOG Glob Rep. 2023 Jul 2;3(3):100250. doi: 10.1016/j.xagr.2023.100250. eCollection 2023 Aug.
3
Age, geographical and socio-economic related inequalities in contraceptive prevalence: evidence from the 1993-2014 Ghana Demographic and Health Surveys.
避孕普及率方面与年龄、地域及社会经济相关的不平等:来自1993 - 2014年加纳人口与健康调查的证据
Contracept Reprod Med. 2023 Feb 7;8(1):20. doi: 10.1186/s40834-022-00194-9.
4
Give women what they want: contraceptive discontinuation and method preference in urban Ghana.给予女性她们想要的:加纳城市地区的避孕措施停用情况及方法偏好
Contracept Reprod Med. 2023 Jan 16;8(1):5. doi: 10.1186/s40834-022-00200-0.
5
Contraceptive and abortion practices of young Ghanaian women aged 15-24: evidence from a nationally representative survey.15至24岁加纳年轻女性的避孕与堕胎行为:来自一项全国代表性调查的证据
Reprod Health. 2021 Jul 18;18(1):150. doi: 10.1186/s12978-021-01189-6.
6
Why does uptake of family planning services remain sub-optimal among Nigerian women? A systematic review of challenges and implications for policy.为什么尼日利亚女性的计划生育服务利用率仍然不理想?对挑战及政策影响的系统评价。
Contracept Reprod Med. 2020 Oct 31;5(1):30. doi: 10.1186/s40834-020-00133-6.
7
Prevalence and Correlates of Perceived Infertility in Ghana.加纳的不孕感知率及其相关因素。
Stud Fam Plann. 2020 Sep;51(3):207-224. doi: 10.1111/sifp.12136.
8
Determinants of modern contraceptive use among sexually active men in Ethiopia; using EDHS 2016 national survey.埃塞俄比亚性活跃男性现代避孕方法使用的决定因素;基于2016年埃塞俄比亚人口与健康调查全国性调查数据
Contracept Reprod Med. 2020 May 6;5:5. doi: 10.1186/s40834-020-00108-7. eCollection 2020.
9
Does community mobilisation improve awareness, approval and uptake of family planning methods among women of reproductive age in Ebonyi State? Experience from a quasi-experimental study.社区动员能否提高埃邦伊州育龄妇女对计划生育方法的认知、认可和采用率?一项准实验研究的经验。
Pan Afr Med J. 2019 May 10;33:17. doi: 10.11604/pamj.2019.33.17.17401. eCollection 2019.
10
Ideation and intention to use contraceptives in Kenya and Nigeria.肯尼亚和尼日利亚的避孕观念及使用意愿。
Demogr Res. 2015 Jul-Dec;33:211-238. doi: 10.4054/DemRes.2015.33.8. Epub 2015 Jul 21.