Modica P A, Tempelhoff R, White P F
Department of Anesthesiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110.
Anesth Analg. 1990 Mar;70(3):303-15. doi: 10.1213/00000539-199003000-00013.
Many inhaled anesthetics and intravenous analgesics have been alleged to produce both proconvulsant and anticonvulsant activity in humans. The reasons for these contrasting actions on the CNS are poorly understood at the present time. However, biologic variability plays an important role in determining individual patient's responses to anesthetic and analgesic drugs. In addition, variations in the responsiveness of inhibitory and excitatory neurons to the central depressant effects of these drugs could also explain these apparently conflicting data. Depending on the brain concentration, centrally active drugs may produce differing effects on the CNS inhibitory and excitatory neurotransmitter systems. The availability of increasingly powerful magnetic resonance imaging techniques to provide noninvasive information about tissue chemistry (e.g., neurotransmitters and citric acid cycle metabolites) and positron emission tomography to noninvasively evaluate CNS drug-receptor interactions should lead to a more in-depth understanding of the in vivo effects of anesthetics and analgesics on the CNS. In the second part of this review article, we discuss the pro- and anticonvulsant effects of the sedative-hypnotics, local anesthetics, and other anesthetic adjuvant drugs.
许多吸入性麻醉剂和静脉镇痛药据称在人体中既能产生促惊厥作用,又能产生抗惊厥作用。目前,对于这些在中枢神经系统(CNS)上的相反作用的原因了解甚少。然而,生物变异性在决定个体患者对麻醉药和镇痛药的反应方面起着重要作用。此外,抑制性和兴奋性神经元对这些药物的中枢抑制作用的反应性差异也可以解释这些明显相互矛盾的数据。取决于脑内浓度,中枢活性药物可能对中枢神经系统抑制性和兴奋性神经递质系统产生不同的影响。越来越强大的磁共振成像技术可提供有关组织化学(如神经递质和柠檬酸循环代谢物)的非侵入性信息,以及正电子发射断层扫描可用于非侵入性评估中枢神经系统药物 - 受体相互作用,这应该会使我们对麻醉药和镇痛药在体内对中枢神经系统的作用有更深入的了解。在这篇综述文章的第二部分,我们将讨论镇静催眠药、局部麻醉药和其他麻醉辅助药物的促惊厥和抗惊厥作用。