• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

患者对初级卫生保健的价值观:定性和定量证据的系统评价。

Patients values regarding primary health care: a systematic review of qualitative and quantitative evidence.

机构信息

Department of Ethics, Law, and Humanities, Faculty of Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Department of Medical Education and Bioethics, Faculty of Medicine, Public Health and Nursing, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, Indonesia.

出版信息

BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Apr 25;23(1):400. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09394-8.

DOI:10.1186/s12913-023-09394-8
PMID:37098522
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10131468/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Accessible and high-quality primary health care (PHC) is fundamental to countries moving towards universal health coverage. In order to improve the quality of patient-centered care provided in PHC, a comprehensive understanding of patients' values is crucial to address any gaps in the health care system. This systematic review aimed to identify patients' values relevant to PHC.

METHODS

We searched primary qualitative and quantitative studies about patients' values related to primary care in PubMed and EMBASE (Ovid) from 2009 to 2020. The studies' quality was assessed using Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) Critical Appraisal Checklist for both quantitative and qualitative studies and Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Studies (COREQ) for qualitative studies. A thematic approach was used in the data synthesis.

OUTCOME

The database search resulted in 1,817 articles. A total of 68 articles were full-text screened. Data were extracted from nine quantitative and nine qualitative studies that met the inclusion criteria. The participants of the studies were mainly the general population in high-income countries. Four themes emerged from the analysis: patients' values related to privacy and autonomy; values associated with the general practitioners including virtuous characteristics, knowledge and competence; values involving patient-doctor interactions such as shared decision-making and empowerment; and core values related to the primary care system such as continuity, referral, and accessibility.

CONCLUSIONS

This review reveals that the doctor's personal characteristics and their interactions with the patients are critical considerations concerning the primary care services from the patients' point of view. The inclusion of these values is essential to improve the quality of primary care.

摘要

背景

可及且高质量的初级卫生保健(PHC)是各国实现全民健康覆盖的基础。为了提高 PHC 中以患者为中心的护理质量,全面了解患者的价值观对于解决医疗体系中的任何差距至关重要。本系统评价旨在确定与 PHC 相关的患者价值观。

方法

我们在 PubMed 和 EMBASE(Ovid)中搜索了 2009 年至 2020 年与初级保健相关的患者价值观的原始定性和定量研究。使用 Joanna Briggs 研究所(JBI)的定量和定性研究的批判性评估清单以及定性研究的统一报告标准(COREQ)评估研究质量。在数据综合中使用了主题方法。

结果

数据库搜索产生了 1817 篇文章。共有 68 篇文章进行了全文筛选。从符合纳入标准的九项定量研究和九项定性研究中提取了数据。研究的参与者主要是高收入国家的一般人群。分析得出了四个主题:患者与隐私和自主权相关的价值观;与全科医生相关的价值观,包括美德特征、知识和能力;涉及医患互动的价值观,如共同决策和赋权;以及与初级保健系统相关的核心价值观,如连续性、转诊和可及性。

结论

本综述表明,从患者的角度来看,医生的个人特征及其与患者的互动是初级保健服务的关键考虑因素。纳入这些价值观对于提高初级保健质量至关重要。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7437/10131468/919ee834a060/12913_2023_9394_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7437/10131468/c5f110abfd6f/12913_2023_9394_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7437/10131468/1e0dbe573966/12913_2023_9394_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7437/10131468/919ee834a060/12913_2023_9394_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7437/10131468/c5f110abfd6f/12913_2023_9394_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7437/10131468/1e0dbe573966/12913_2023_9394_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7437/10131468/919ee834a060/12913_2023_9394_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Patients values regarding primary health care: a systematic review of qualitative and quantitative evidence.患者对初级卫生保健的价值观:定性和定量证据的系统评价。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Apr 25;23(1):400. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09394-8.
2
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
3
Promoting and supporting self-management for adults living in the community with physical chronic illness: A systematic review of the effectiveness and meaningfulness of the patient-practitioner encounter.促进和支持社区中患有慢性身体疾病的成年人进行自我管理:对医患互动的有效性和意义的系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009;7(13):492-582. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200907130-00001.
4
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.医疗专业人员在急症医院环境中团队合作教育的经验:对定性文献的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.
5
Barriers and facilitators to the implementation of doctor-nurse substitution strategies in primary care: a qualitative evidence synthesis.基层医疗中实施医生-护士替代策略的障碍与促进因素:一项定性证据综合分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Apr 15;4(4):CD010412. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010412.pub2.
6
A qualitative systematic review of internal and external influences on shared decision-making in all health care settings.对所有医疗环境中共同决策的内部和外部影响进行的定性系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2012;10(58):4633-4646. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2012-432.
7
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
8
Provision and uptake of routine antenatal services: a qualitative evidence synthesis.常规产前服务的提供与接受情况:一项定性证据综合分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Jun 12;6(6):CD012392. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012392.pub2.
9
Patients' involvement in improvement initiatives: a qualitative systematic review.患者参与改进举措:一项定性系统评价
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Oct;13(10):232-90. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1452.
10
Integrating patient values and preferences in healthcare: a systematic review of qualitative evidence.将患者价值观和偏好纳入医疗保健中:定性证据的系统评价。
BMJ Open. 2022 Nov 18;12(11):e067268. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-067268.

引用本文的文献

1
Exploring user experiences in a novel primary care center: a qualitative grounded theory study.探索新型基层医疗中心的用户体验:一项质性扎根理论研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Sep 2;25(1):1174. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-13313-4.
2
The influence of age on brief motivational intervention for unhealthy alcohol use.年龄对不健康饮酒简短动机干预的影响。
Drug Alcohol Depend Rep. 2024 Dec 15;14:100313. doi: 10.1016/j.dadr.2024.100313. eCollection 2025 Mar.
3
Evidence-based rehabilitation medicine: definition, foundation, practice and development.

本文引用的文献

1
"I'd feel like someone was watchin' me… watching for a good reason": perceptions of data privacy, access, and sharing in the context of real-time PrEP adherence monitoring among HIV-negative MSM with substance use.“我会觉得有人在监视我……而且是出于正当理由监视”:在有药物使用问题的HIV阴性男男性行为者实时暴露前预防依从性监测背景下对数据隐私、获取和共享的认知
AIDS Behav. 2022 Sep;26(9):2981-2993. doi: 10.1007/s10461-022-03614-8. Epub 2022 Mar 18.
2
Is Indonesia achieving universal health coverage? Secondary analysis of national data on insurance coverage, health spending and service availability.印度尼西亚是否实现了全民健康覆盖?基于保险覆盖、卫生支出和服务提供情况的国家数据的二次分析。
BMJ Open. 2021 Oct 4;11(10):e050565. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-050565.
3
循证康复医学:定义、基础、实践与发展
Med Rev (2021). 2023 Sep 25;4(1):42-54. doi: 10.1515/mr-2023-0027. eCollection 2024 Feb.
4
Behind open doors: Patient privacy and the impact of design in primary health care, a qualitative study in Indonesia.敞开的门背后:患者隐私与初级卫生保健中设计的影响,印度尼西亚的一项定性研究
Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 Oct 19;9:915237. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.915237. eCollection 2022.
A meta-review demonstrates improved reporting quality of qualitative reviews following the publication of COREQ- and ENTREQ-checklists, regardless of modest uptake.元回顾表明,无论采用情况如何,在发布 COREQ- 和 ENTREQ 清单后,定性综述的报告质量都有所提高。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2021 Sep 12;21(1):184. doi: 10.1186/s12874-021-01363-1.
4
Primary medical care continuity and patient mortality: a systematic review.初级医疗保健的连续性与患者死亡率:一项系统评价。
Br J Gen Pract. 2020 Aug 27;70(698):e600-e611. doi: 10.3399/bjgp20X712289. Print 2020 Sep.
5
Communication and Respect for Patient Value as Significant Factors in Patient-Centered Infertility Care: A Survey of Patients' Experiences in Two Infertility Centers.沟通与对患者价值观的尊重作为以患者为中心的不孕症护理的重要因素:对两个不孕症中心患者经历的调查
J Hum Reprod Sci. 2020 Jan-Mar;13(1):22-25. doi: 10.4103/jhrs.JHRS_62_19. Epub 2020 Apr 7.
6
Protecting health privacy even when privacy is lost.保护健康隐私,即使隐私已经泄露。
J Med Ethics. 2020 Nov;46(11):768-772. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2019-105880. Epub 2019 Dec 5.
7
Conference abstracts describing systematic reviews on pain were selectively published, not reliable, and poorly reported.描述系统评价疼痛的会议摘要存在选择性发表、不可靠且报告质量差的问题。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2020 Jan;117:1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.09.011. Epub 2019 Sep 15.
8
Patient satisfaction and treatment outcomes of primary care practice in Ghana.加纳初级医疗实践中的患者满意度与治疗效果
Ghana Med J. 2019 Mar;53(1):63-70. doi: 10.4314/gmj.v53i1.10.
9
Impact of GP gatekeeping on quality of care, and health outcomes, use, and expenditure: a systematic review.GP 守门人对医疗质量、健康结果、使用和支出的影响:系统评价。
Br J Gen Pract. 2019 May;69(682):e294-e303. doi: 10.3399/bjgp19X702209. Epub 2019 Mar 25.
10
Systematic review on women's values and preferences concerning breast cancer screening and diagnostic services.系统综述:女性对乳腺癌筛查和诊断服务的价值观和偏好
Psychooncology. 2019 May;28(5):939-947. doi: 10.1002/pon.5041. Epub 2019 Mar 24.