• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[内耳道狭窄患者人工耳蜗植入术中EABR特征及康复效果评估]

[Evaluation of intra-operative EABR characteristics and rehabilitation effects of cochlear implantation in patients with internal auditory canal stenosis].

作者信息

Jin Yi, Cao Keli, Wei Chaogang, Wang Bin

机构信息

Department of Cochlear Implant Center, Otolaryngology of Peking Union Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science, Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100730, China.

出版信息

Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2013 Jul;27(13):694-7, 700.

PMID:24073575
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the intra-operative electrical evoked auditory brain stem response (EABR) characteristics and the hearing and speech rehabilitation effects of cochlear implantation (CI) in patients with internal auditory canal stenosis (IACS).

METHOD

A retrospective study was performed on 16 patients with IACS (IACS group) matched with 16 implanted without IACS (control group), who received multi- channel CI because of pre-lingual sensorineural hearing loss. The integrity and functional status of the auditory pathway were assessed by EABR, recording waveforms, thresholds and dynamic ranges intra-operation before CI. Interviewed the implanted parents or teachers, asking them to rate the implanted hearing and speech ability according to Categories of Auditory Performance (CAP) and Speech Intelligibility Rating (SIR). Paired T test was performed to compare scores of CAP and SIR between before and 1 year after CI, while Spearman test was performed to compare correlation between EABR grades and post-operative CAP scores.

RESULT

Among the IACS group, 2 cases weren't recorded typical EABR waveforms and without auditory response 1 year after a successful CI. The EABR waveforms in the IACS group were poorer than that in the control group, their EABR thresholds higher than the control group, and their EABR dynamic ranges less than the control group. The hearing and speech rehabilitation after CI showed that the results of CAP and SIR values (3.47 +/- 1.09 and 1.62 +/- 0.50) scored significantly lower than the control group (5.06 +/- 0.79 and 2.59 +/- 0.58) (P < 0.05), but significantly increased compared with pre-operation. Intra-operative EABR grades and post-operative CAP scores showed significant correlation (r = 0.78 , P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Intra-operative EABR can accurately monitor the integrity and functional status of the auditory pathway, be of important clinical value in predicting whether patients can acquire auditory responses with the aid of CI. CI can help patients with IACS to improve the ability of hearing and speech with EABR to screen out compatible implanted.

摘要

目的

探讨内耳道狭窄(IACS)患者人工耳蜗植入(CI)术中电诱发听觉脑干反应(EABR)特点及听力和言语康复效果。

方法

对16例IACS患者(IACS组)和16例无IACS的植入患者(对照组)进行回顾性研究,这些患者因语前感音神经性听力损失接受多通道CI。通过EABR评估听觉通路的完整性和功能状态,在CI术前记录术中波形、阈值和动态范围。对植入患者的家长或教师进行访谈,要求他们根据听觉表现类别(CAP)和言语可懂度评分(SIR)对植入患者的听力和言语能力进行评分。采用配对t检验比较CI术前和术后1年CAP和SIR评分,采用Spearman检验比较EABR分级与术后CAP评分的相关性。

结果

IACS组中,2例在CI成功后1年未记录到典型EABR波形且无听觉反应。IACS组的EABR波形比对照组差,EABR阈值高于对照组,EABR动态范围小于对照组。CI术后听力和言语康复显示,CAP和SIR值(3.47±1.09和1.62±0.50)评分显著低于对照组(5.06±0.79和2.59±0.58)(P<0.05),但与术前相比显著提高。术中EABR分级与术后CAP评分呈显著相关(r=0.78,P<0.05)。

结论

术中EABR可准确监测听觉通路的完整性和功能状态,对预测患者能否借助CI获得听觉反应具有重要临床价值。CI可帮助IACS患者提高听力和言语能力,通过EABR筛选出合适的植入者。

相似文献

1
[Evaluation of intra-operative EABR characteristics and rehabilitation effects of cochlear implantation in patients with internal auditory canal stenosis].[内耳道狭窄患者人工耳蜗植入术中EABR特征及康复效果评估]
Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2013 Jul;27(13):694-7, 700.
2
[Cochlear implantation in patients with auditory neuropathy assisted by intra-operative EABR and the therapeutic effect evaluation].术中电刺激听性脑干反应辅助下听觉神经病患者的人工耳蜗植入及疗效评估
Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2013 May;27(10):449-54.
3
[The assessment of cochlear implantation assisted by EABR in patients with common cavity deformity].[EABR辅助下对共同腔畸形患者进行人工耳蜗植入的评估]
Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2011 May;25(10):436-40.
4
Value of intracochlear electrically evoked auditory brainstem response after cochlear implantation in patients with narrow internal auditory canal.窄内听道患者人工耳蜗植入术后耳蜗内电诱发听觉脑干反应的价值。
Laryngoscope. 2010 Aug;120(8):1625-31. doi: 10.1002/lary.21008.
5
Relationship between electrically evoked auditory brainstem response and auditory performance after cochlear implant in patients with auditory neuropathy spectrum disorder.听神经病谱系障碍患者人工耳蜗植入后电诱发听觉脑干反应与听觉表现的关系。
Otol Neurotol. 2013 Sep;34(7):1261-6. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e318291c632.
6
The Relationship Between EABR and Auditory Performance and Speech Intelligibility Outcomes in Pediatric Cochlear Implant Recipients.小儿人工耳蜗植入受者中电诱发听觉脑干反应(EABR)与听觉表现及言语可懂度结果之间的关系
Am J Audiol. 2015 Jun;24(2):226-34. doi: 10.1044/2015_AJA-14-0023.
7
[Measurement of electrical evoked middle latency response in cochlear implantation operation].[人工耳蜗植入手术中电诱发中潜伏期反应的测量]
Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2012 Mar;47(3):196-201.
8
Role of electrically evoked auditory brainstem response in cochlear implantation of children with inner ear malformations.电诱发听性脑干反应在内耳畸形儿童人工耳蜗植入中的作用
Otol Neurotol. 2008 Aug;29(5):626-34. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e31817781f5.
9
The pattern of auditory brainstem response wave V maturation in cochlear-implanted children.人工耳蜗植入儿童听觉脑干反应V波的成熟模式。
Clin Neurophysiol. 2007 Mar;118(3):676-89. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2006.11.010. Epub 2007 Jan 16.
10
Correlation between Preoperative Auditory Steady-State Response and Postoperative Electrically Evoked Auditory Brainstem Response and T Level in Cochlear Implantation for Child Patients with Inner-Ear Malformations.内耳畸形儿童患者人工耳蜗植入术前听觉稳态反应与术后电诱发听觉脑干反应及T水平的相关性
ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec. 2018;80(1):51-57. doi: 10.1159/000487238. Epub 2018 Apr 19.