Center for Healthcare Outcomes and Policy, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.
Lancet. 2013 Sep 28;382(9898):1121-9. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)61215-5.
The use of common surgical procedures varies widely across regions. Differences in illness burden, diagnostic practices, and patient attitudes about medical intervention explain only a small degree of regional variation in surgery rates. Evidence suggests that surgical variation results mainly from differences in physician beliefs about the indications for surgery, and the extent to which patient preferences are incorporated into treatment decisions. These two components of clinical decision making help to explain the so-called surgical signatures of specific procedures, and why some consistently vary more than others. Variation in clinical decision making is, in turn, affected by broad environmental factors, including technology diffusion, supply of specialists, local training frameworks, financial incentives, and regulatory factors, which vary across countries. Better scientific evidence about the comparative effectiveness of surgical and non-surgical interventions could help to mitigate regional variation, but broader dissemination of shared decision aids will be essential to reduce variation in preference-sensitive disorders.
常见手术操作在不同地区的应用差异很大。疾病负担、诊断实践以及患者对医疗干预的态度方面的差异,仅能解释手术率的一小部分地区差异。有证据表明,手术差异主要是由于医生对手术适应证的信念以及将患者偏好纳入治疗决策的程度不同所致。这两个临床决策的组成部分有助于解释特定手术操作的所谓“手术特征”,以及为什么某些手术操作比其他手术操作更具变异性。临床决策的变异性反过来又受到广泛的环境因素的影响,包括技术传播、专科医生供应、当地培训框架、经济激励措施和监管因素,这些因素在各国之间存在差异。关于手术和非手术干预措施的比较效果的更好的科学证据可能有助于减轻地区差异,但广泛传播共享决策辅助工具对于减少偏好敏感障碍的变异性至关重要。