Behavioural Science Institute, Learning & Plasticity, Montessorilaan 3, Nijmegen, Netherlands.
Res Dev Disabil. 2013 Nov;34(11):4194-202. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2013.08.039. Epub 2013 Sep 26.
In the present study for 108 typical and 122 atypical Dutch readers in second grade, the accuracy and speed of decoding words and pseudowords, as well as the accuracy of spelling words were assessed along with four types of phonological precursor measures: rapid naming, verbal working memory, phoneme awareness and letter knowledge. The data show that the group being diagnosed as poor readers were significantly behind in all reading and spelling measures. It was also found that the criterion measures of reading and spelling explained already two third of the variance associated with the group distinction. Finally, we found word and pseudoword efficiency in the typical group to be explained by phonological awareness (spoonerism) and rapid naming of letters, word and pseudoword accuracy by phonological awareness, and spelling by phonological awareness and letter dictation. In the group of poor readers, a much greater variety of precursor measures was involved in explaining the variance in reading and spelling abilities.
在本研究中,我们评估了 108 名典型荷兰二年级学生和 122 名非典型荷兰二年级学生在解码单词和假词的准确性和速度,以及拼写单词的准确性,同时评估了四种类型的语音前导测量:快速命名、言语工作记忆、音素意识和字母知识。数据显示,被诊断为阅读困难的学生在所有阅读和拼写测量中都明显落后。我们还发现,阅读和拼写的标准测量已经解释了与群体差异相关的三分之二的方差。最后,我们发现典型组的单词和假词效率可以用语音意识(错语)和字母快速命名来解释,单词和假词的准确性可以用语音意识来解释,拼写可以用语音意识和字母听写来解释。在阅读困难组中,涉及更多的前导措施来解释阅读和拼写能力的差异。