Suppr超能文献

一套用于艾滋病护理的新型药物依从性自我报告项目的认知与现场测试。

Cognitive and field testing of a new set of medication adherence self-report items for HIV care.

作者信息

Wilson Ira B, Fowler Floyd J, Cosenza Carol A, Michaud Joanne, Bentkover Judy, Rana Aadia, Kogelman Laura, Rogers William H

出版信息

AIDS Behav. 2014 Dec;18(12):2349-58. doi: 10.1007/s10461-013-0610-1.

Abstract

We conducted four rounds of cognitive testing of self-report items that included 66 sociodemographically diverse participants, then field tested the three best items from the cognitive testing in a clinic waiting room (N = 351) and in an online social networking site for men who have sex with men (N = 6,485). As part of the online survey we conducted a randomized assessment of two versions of the adherence questionnaire-one which asked about adherence to a specific antiretroviral medication, and a second which asked about adherence to their "HIV medicines" as a group. Participants were better able to respond using adjectival and adverbial scales than visual analogue or percent items. The internal consistency reliability of the three item adherence scale was 0.89. Mean scores for the two different versions of the online survey were similar (91.0 vs. 90.2, p < 0.05), suggesting that it is not necessary, in general, to ask about individual medications in an antiretroviral therapy regimen when attempting to describe overall adherence.

摘要

我们对自我报告项目进行了四轮认知测试,共有66名社会人口统计学特征各异的参与者,然后在诊所候诊室(N = 351)和一个男男性行为者在线社交网站(N = 6485)对认知测试中表现最佳的三个项目进行了现场测试。作为在线调查的一部分,我们对两种版本的依从性问卷进行了随机评估,一个版本询问对特定抗逆转录病毒药物的依从性,另一个版本询问对其“HIV药物”总体的依从性。与视觉模拟量表或百分比项目相比,参与者使用形容词和副词量表回答问题的能力更强。三项依从性量表内部一致性信度为0.89。在线调查两个不同版本的平均得分相似(91.0对90.2,p < 0.05),这表明在试图描述总体依从性时,一般没有必要询问抗逆转录病毒治疗方案中的个别药物。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/beb5/4228111/8a25a740861a/10461_2013_610_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验