Wilson Ira B, Fowler Floyd J, Cosenza Carol A, Michaud Joanne, Bentkover Judy, Rana Aadia, Kogelman Laura, Rogers William H
AIDS Behav. 2014 Dec;18(12):2349-58. doi: 10.1007/s10461-013-0610-1.
We conducted four rounds of cognitive testing of self-report items that included 66 sociodemographically diverse participants, then field tested the three best items from the cognitive testing in a clinic waiting room (N = 351) and in an online social networking site for men who have sex with men (N = 6,485). As part of the online survey we conducted a randomized assessment of two versions of the adherence questionnaire-one which asked about adherence to a specific antiretroviral medication, and a second which asked about adherence to their "HIV medicines" as a group. Participants were better able to respond using adjectival and adverbial scales than visual analogue or percent items. The internal consistency reliability of the three item adherence scale was 0.89. Mean scores for the two different versions of the online survey were similar (91.0 vs. 90.2, p < 0.05), suggesting that it is not necessary, in general, to ask about individual medications in an antiretroviral therapy regimen when attempting to describe overall adherence.
我们对自我报告项目进行了四轮认知测试,共有66名社会人口统计学特征各异的参与者,然后在诊所候诊室(N = 351)和一个男男性行为者在线社交网站(N = 6485)对认知测试中表现最佳的三个项目进行了现场测试。作为在线调查的一部分,我们对两种版本的依从性问卷进行了随机评估,一个版本询问对特定抗逆转录病毒药物的依从性,另一个版本询问对其“HIV药物”总体的依从性。与视觉模拟量表或百分比项目相比,参与者使用形容词和副词量表回答问题的能力更强。三项依从性量表内部一致性信度为0.89。在线调查两个不同版本的平均得分相似(91.0对90.2,p < 0.05),这表明在试图描述总体依从性时,一般没有必要询问抗逆转录病毒治疗方案中的个别药物。