• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

神经祖细胞欧洲专利被撤销凸显与人类胚胎干细胞相关发明的专利挑战

Revocation of European patent for neural progenitors highlights patent challenges for inventions relating to human embryonic stem cells.

机构信息

Patent Attorney, Dehns , London , UK

出版信息

Expert Opin Ther Pat. 2013 Nov;23(11):1395-8. doi: 10.1517/13543776.2013.845170. Epub 2013 Oct 1.

DOI:10.1517/13543776.2013.845170
PMID:24079708
Abstract

Cells derived from human embryonic stem cells have great therapeutic potential. Patents are key to allowing companies that develop methods of generating such cells to recuperate their investment. However, in Europe, inventions relating to the use of human embryos for commercial purposes are excluded from patentability on moral grounds. The scope of this morality exclusion was recently tested before Germany's highest court and before the European Patent Office (EPO), with diverging results. The decision by the EPO's Opposition Division to revoke EP1040185 relating to neural precursors and methods for their generation has received a mixed reception. The decision has very recently been appealed, and the outcome of this Appeal should provide more definitive guidance on the scope of the morality exclusion.

摘要

人胚胎干细胞衍生的细胞具有巨大的治疗潜力。专利是允许开发此类细胞生成方法的公司收回投资的关键。然而,在欧洲,出于道德原因,与将人类胚胎用于商业目的有关的发明被排除在可专利性之外。最近,德国最高法院和欧洲专利局(EPO)对这种道德豁免的范围进行了测试,结果不一。EPO 异议部门决定撤销与神经前体细胞及其生成方法有关的 EP1040185 专利,这一决定引起了不同的反响。该决定最近已被上诉,该上诉的结果应该为道德豁免范围提供更明确的指导。

相似文献

1
Revocation of European patent for neural progenitors highlights patent challenges for inventions relating to human embryonic stem cells.神经祖细胞欧洲专利被撤销凸显与人类胚胎干细胞相关发明的专利挑战
Expert Opin Ther Pat. 2013 Nov;23(11):1395-8. doi: 10.1517/13543776.2013.845170. Epub 2013 Oct 1.
2
Patents on inventions related to human embryonic stem cells: the morality clause after Brüstle v. Greenpeace.与人类胚胎干细胞相关的发明的专利:布吕斯特尔诉绿色和平组织案后的道德条款
Med Law. 2013 Sep;32(3):347-72.
3
Is the European Patent Office's approach to assessing obviousness of antibody inventions consistent?欧洲专利局评估抗体发明显而易见性的方法是否一致?
Expert Opin Ther Pat. 2014 Dec;24(12):1283-5. doi: 10.1517/13543776.2014.981255.
4
Ethical questions to ponder in the European stem cell patent debate.欧洲干细胞专利辩论中需要思考的伦理问题。
J Biolaw Bus. 2006;9(3):12-6.
5
Patentability of Parthenogenic Stem Cells: International Stem Cell Corporation v. Comptroller General of Patents.孤雌生殖干细胞的可专利性:国际干细胞公司诉专利审查总长案
Eur J Health Law. 2015 Jun;22(3):267-86. doi: 10.1163/15718093-12341356.
6
Patenting, morality and human embryonic stem cell science: bioethics and cultural politics in Europe.专利、道德与人类胚胎干细胞科学:欧洲的生物伦理学与文化政治
Regen Med. 2007 May;2(3):301-11. doi: 10.2217/17460751.2.3.301.
7
Trends in the human embryonic stem cell patent field.人类胚胎干细胞专利领域的趋势。
Recent Pat Nanotechnol. 2007;1(3):233-7. doi: 10.2174/187221007782360475.
8
The immoral gene: does it really exist?不道德基因:它真的存在吗?
Sci Eng Ethics. 2005 Jan;11(1):97-104. doi: 10.1007/s11948-005-0061-9.
9
The Patentability of Stem Cells in Australia.澳大利亚干细胞的可专利性
Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med. 2015 Jul 1;5(10):a020966. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a020966.
10
[Patent protection in modern medical technology].[现代医学技术中的专利保护]
Biomed Tech (Berl). 2002;47 Suppl 1 Pt 2:686-7.