City of Paderborn Fire department, Paderborn, Germany; Department of internal medicine III, Klinikum Kassel, Kassel, Germany.
City of Paderborn Fire department, Paderborn, Germany.
Am J Emerg Med. 2014 Jan;32(1):82-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2013.08.040. Epub 2013 Sep 27.
The current resuscitation guidelines of the European Resuscitation Council do not include automatic chest compression devices (ACDs) as standard equipment to support cardiopulmonary resuscitation attempts. One possible reason could be the lack of a list of indications and contraindications for the use of ACD systems. This review should give a summary of current studies and developments according to ACD systems and deliver a list of possible applications. Furthermore, we discuss some ethical problems with cardiopulmonary resuscitation attempts and, in particular, with ACD systems. The use of ACDs occurs instead of manual chest compression. Because of this, there is no reason for changing the current guidelines, especially termination recommendations while using ACD systems. From our point of view, ACDs are a very good supplement to the current standard of resuscitation according to the European Resuscitation Council guidelines.
目前,欧洲复苏委员会的复苏指南并未将自动胸部按压设备(ACD)作为支持心肺复苏尝试的标准设备。一个可能的原因是缺乏 ACD 系统使用的适应症和禁忌症清单。本综述应根据 ACD 系统对当前的研究和发展进行总结,并提供可能的应用清单。此外,我们还讨论了心肺复苏尝试,特别是 ACD 系统的一些伦理问题。ACD 的使用是代替手动胸部按压。因此,没有理由改变当前的指南,特别是在使用 ACD 系统时终止建议。从我们的角度来看,ACD 是对根据欧洲复苏委员会指南的当前复苏标准的很好的补充。