*Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, and †Department of Neurology, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland; ‡Neuroscience Research Australia and the University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia; §German Center for Vertigo and Balance Disorders (IFB LMU), University Hospital Munich, Campus Grosshadern; and ∥Lausitz University of Applied Sciences, Senftenberg, Germany.
Otol Neurotol. 2014 Feb;35(2):283-8. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e3182995227.
To evaluate the validity of 2D video-oculography (VOG) compared with scleral search coils for horizontal AVOR gain estimation in older individuals.
Cross-sectional validation study.
Tertiary care academic medical center.
Six individuals age 70 and older.
Simultaneous eye movement recording with scleral search coil (over right eye) and EyeSeeCam VOG camera (over left eye) during horizontal head impulses.
Best estimate search coil and VOG horizontal AVOR gain, presence of compensatory saccades using both eye movement recording techniques.
We observed a significant correlation between search coil and VOG best estimate horizontal AVOR gain (r = 0.86, p = 0.0002). We evaluated individual head impulses and found that the shapes of the head movement and eye movement traces from the coil and VOG systems were similar. Specific features of eye movements seen in older individuals, including overt and covert corrective saccades and anticompensatory eye movements, were captured by both the search coil and VOG systems.
These data suggest that VOG is a reasonable proxy for search coil eye movement recording in older subjects to estimate VOR gain and the approximate timing of corrective eye movements. VOG offers advantages over the conventional search coil method; it is portable and easy to use, allowing for quantitative VOR estimation in diverse settings such as a routine office-based practice, at the bedside, and potentially in larger scale population analyses.
评估 2 维视频眼动描记术(VOG)与巩膜搜索线圈在评估老年个体水平前庭眼反射(AVOR)增益中的有效性。
横断面验证研究。
三级保健学术医疗中心。
6 名年龄 70 岁及以上的个体。
在水平头部脉冲期间,使用巩膜搜索线圈(右眼)和 EyeSeeCam VOG 相机(左眼)同时记录眼动。
最佳搜索线圈和 VOG 水平 AVOR 增益,使用两种眼动记录技术检测补偿性扫视的存在。
我们观察到搜索线圈和 VOG 最佳估计水平 AVOR 增益之间存在显著相关性(r = 0.86,p = 0.0002)。我们评估了个体的头部脉冲,发现来自线圈和 VOG 系统的头部运动和眼动轨迹的形状相似。在老年个体中观察到的特定眼动特征,包括显性和隐性校正扫视以及非补偿性眼动,均被搜索线圈和 VOG 系统捕捉到。
这些数据表明,VOG 是评估老年个体 VOR 增益和估计校正性眼动大致时间的搜索线圈眼动记录的合理替代方法。VOG 具有优于传统搜索线圈方法的优势,它便携易用,可在各种环境中进行定量 VOR 估计,例如常规的基于办公室的实践、床边,以及在更大规模的人群分析中。