Suppr超能文献

颈动脉内膜切除术后的血肿可通过术后对颈部进行直接按压来减少。

Haematomas after carotid endarterectomy can be reduced by direct pressure to the neck postoperatively.

作者信息

Saghir R, Humm G, Rix T

机构信息

GKT School of Medicine, King's College London , London , UK.

General Surgery Canterbury Hospital , Canterbury, Kent , UK.

出版信息

Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2018 Sep;100(7):580-583. doi: 10.1308/rcsann.2018.0109. Epub 2018 Jun 18.

Abstract

Introduction A recognised complication of carotid endarterectomy (CEA) is postoperative haematoma, which can threaten the airway. Previous studies have looked at medical methods of preventing this complication. This study aims to evaluate the impact of simple direct pressure postoperatively on the development of haematoma. Materials and methods From 2011 to 2016, 161 consecutive CEA were performed by a single surgeon or trainee under supervision. After 80 operations, the postoperative technique was altered, with additional pressure being applied by the surgeon to the skin incision from completion of suturing until each patient was awake in the recovery room. The rates of postoperative haematoma and other complications were compared between the pre- and post-intervention groups, as well as grade of surgeon, urgency of operation and antiplatelet/anticoagulant use. Results Post-carotid haematomas were eliminated in the post-intervention group (0/81); in the pre-intervention group 7/80 patients developed haematoma (P < 0.05). There were no significant differences in urgency of surgery, antiplatelet/anticoagulant use, grade of surgeon or other complications (stroke: 2/80 vs 0/81 P < 0.05), suggesting that this was not a learning curve effect. Discussion The results suggest that applying direct pressure helps to reduce oozing, provides time to monitor and identify additional bleeding and protects the wound from excessive strain that may be caused by coughing while the patient wakes up. We advise that the lead surgeon should apply such pressure to ensure precise and focal targeting, for maximum effect. Conclusion During recovery from CEA, focused and prolonged pressure by the operating surgeon is a highly effective method of reducing haematoma.

摘要

引言 颈动脉内膜切除术(CEA)公认的一种并发症是术后血肿,这可能会威胁气道。以往的研究探讨了预防这种并发症的医学方法。本研究旨在评估术后简单直接压迫对血肿形成的影响。

材料与方法 2011年至2016年期间,由一名外科医生或在其监督下的实习医生连续进行了161例CEA手术。在80例手术后,改变了术后技术,从缝合完成直至每位患者在恢复室苏醒期间,外科医生对皮肤切口施加额外的压迫。比较了干预前和干预后两组之间术后血肿及其他并发症的发生率,以及外科医生级别、手术紧急程度和抗血小板/抗凝药物的使用情况。

结果 干预后组未出现颈动脉后血肿(0/81);干预前组有7/80例患者发生血肿(P<0.05)。手术紧急程度、抗血小板/抗凝药物使用、外科医生级别或其他并发症(中风:2/80 vs 0/81,P<0.05)方面无显著差异,这表明并非学习曲线效应。

讨论 结果表明,施加直接压迫有助于减少渗血,提供时间监测和识别额外出血,并在患者苏醒时保护伤口免受咳嗽可能导致的过度牵拉。我们建议主刀医生应施加这种压迫,以确保精准聚焦,达到最大效果。

结论 在CEA术后恢复期间,手术医生进行集中且持续的压迫是减少血肿的一种非常有效的方法。

相似文献

2
3
Predictors of cervical bleeding after carotid endarterectomy.颈动脉内膜切除术后颈部出血的预测因素。
Ann Vasc Surg. 2014 Feb;28(2):366-74. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2013.04.011. Epub 2013 Sep 29.
10
Carotid Endarterectomy Following Intravenous Thrombolysis in the UK.英国静脉溶栓后颈动脉内膜切除术。
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2021 Jul;62(1):9-15. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2021.03.033. Epub 2021 Jun 2.

本文引用的文献

4
Carotid Endarterectomy: Current Concepts and Practice Patterns.颈动脉内膜切除术:当前概念与实践模式
Int J Angiol. 2015 Sep;24(3):223-35. doi: 10.1055/s-0035-1558645. Epub 2015 Aug 14.
7
Predictors of cervical bleeding after carotid endarterectomy.颈动脉内膜切除术后颈部出血的预测因素。
Ann Vasc Surg. 2014 Feb;28(2):366-74. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2013.04.011. Epub 2013 Sep 29.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验