• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

提高重症监护病房患者家属的满意度及参与决策程度。

Improving family satisfaction and participation in decision making in an intensive care unit.

作者信息

Huffines Meredith, Johnson Karen L, Smitz Naranjo Linda L, Lissauer Matthew E, Fishel Marmie Ann-Michelle, D'Angelo Howes Susan M, Pannullo Diane, Ralls Mindy, Smith Ruth

出版信息

Crit Care Nurse. 2013 Oct;33(5):56-69. doi: 10.4037/ccn2013354.

DOI:10.4037/ccn2013354
PMID:24085828
Abstract

Background Survey data revealed that families of patients in a surgical intensive care unit were not satisfied with their participation in decision making or with how well the multidisciplinary team worked together. Objectives To develop and implement an evidence-based communication algorithm and evaluate its effect in improving satisfaction among patients' families. Methods A multidisciplinary team developed an algorithm that included bundles of communication interventions at 24, 72, and 96 hours after admission to the unit. The algorithm included clinical triggers, which if present escalated the algorithm. A pre-post design using process improvement methods was used to compare families' satisfaction scores before and after implementation of the algorithm. Results Satisfaction scores for participation in decision making (45% vs 68%; z = -2.62, P = .009) and how well the health care team worked together (64% vs 83%; z = -2.10, P = .04) improved significantly after implementation. Conclusions Use of an evidence-based structured communication algorithm may be a way to improve satisfaction of families of intensive care patients with their participation in decision making and their perception of how well the unit's team works together.

摘要

背景

调查数据显示,外科重症监护病房患者的家属对他们参与决策的情况以及多学科团队的协作情况不满意。目的:制定并实施基于证据的沟通算法,并评估其对提高患者家属满意度的效果。方法:一个多学科团队制定了一种算法,其中包括在患者入院后24小时、72小时和96小时进行的一系列沟通干预措施。该算法包括临床触发因素,若出现这些因素则会使算法升级。采用基于过程改进方法的前后对照设计,比较算法实施前后家属的满意度得分。结果:实施后,参与决策的满意度得分(45%对68%;z = -2.62,P = 0.009)以及医疗团队协作情况的满意度得分(64%对83%;z = -2.10,P = 0.04)均显著提高。结论:使用基于证据的结构化沟通算法可能是提高重症监护患者家属对其参与决策的满意度以及对科室团队协作情况认知度的一种方法。

相似文献

1
Improving family satisfaction and participation in decision making in an intensive care unit.提高重症监护病房患者家属的满意度及参与决策程度。
Crit Care Nurse. 2013 Oct;33(5):56-69. doi: 10.4037/ccn2013354.
2
Decision making and satisfaction with care in the pediatric intensive care unit: findings from a controlled clinical trial.儿科重症监护病房的决策制定与护理满意度:一项对照临床试验的结果
Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2004 Jan;5(1):40-7. doi: 10.1097/01.PCC.0000102413.32891.E5.
3
The effect of a family support intervention on family satisfaction, length-of-stay, and cost of care in the intensive care unit.家庭支持干预对重症监护病房家庭满意度、住院时间和护理费用的影响。
Crit Care Med. 2010 May;38(5):1315-20. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181d9d9fe.
4
Improving family communications at the end of life: implications for length of stay in the intensive care unit and resource use.改善临终时的家庭沟通:对重症监护病房住院时间和资源使用的影响。
Am J Crit Care. 2003 Jul;12(4):317-23; discussion 324.
5
Measuring Family Satisfaction With Care Delivered in the Intensive Care Unit.衡量家庭对重症监护病房所提供护理的满意度。
Crit Care Nurse. 2016 Dec;36(6):e8-e14. doi: 10.4037/ccn2016276.
6
Intensive care unit family satisfaction survey.重症监护病房家属满意度调查。
Hong Kong Med J. 2015 Oct;21(5):435-43. doi: 10.12809/hkmj144385. Epub 2015 Sep 15.
7
Survey of caregiver opinions on the practicalities of family-centred care in intensive care units.对重症监护病房中以家庭为中心的护理实际情况的护理人员意见调查。
J Clin Nurs. 2012 Apr;21(7-8):1060-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2011.03866.x. Epub 2011 Oct 28.
8
Clinician statements and family satisfaction with family conferences in the intensive care unit.重症监护病房中临床医生的陈述以及家属对家属会议的满意度。
Crit Care Med. 2006 Jun;34(6):1679-85. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000218409.58256.AA.
9
The impact of a lean rounding process in a pediatric intensive care unit.精益查房流程对儿科重症监护病房的影响。
Crit Care Med. 2012 Feb;40(2):608-17. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e318232e2fc.
10
Decision-making in the ICU: perspectives of the substitute decision-maker.重症监护病房中的决策:替代决策者的观点
Intensive Care Med. 2003 Jan;29(1):75-82. doi: 10.1007/s00134-002-1569-y. Epub 2002 Nov 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Development and Validation of the Companion's Satisfaction Questionnaire of Patient's Hospitalized in Intensive Care Units.《重症监护病房住院患者陪护满意度问卷的编制及验证》
Invest Educ Enferm. 2024 Mar;42(1). doi: 10.17533/udea.iee.v42n1e09.
2
Family Satisfaction with Care Provided in Intensive Care Unit; a Multi-Center, Cross-Sectional Study.家庭对重症监护病房所提供护理的满意度;一项多中心横断面研究。
Patient Relat Outcome Meas. 2024 Apr 22;15:105-119. doi: 10.2147/PROM.S453246. eCollection 2024.
3
The Family Involvement in Care Questionnaire-An instrument measuring family involvement in inpatient care.
家庭参与护理问卷-用于测量家庭参与住院护理的工具。
PLoS One. 2023 Aug 15;18(8):e0285562. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0285562. eCollection 2023.
4
Comparison between the perceptions of family members and health professionals regarding a flexible visitation model in an adult intensive care unit: a cross-sectional study.比较成年重症监护病房中家庭成员和卫生专业人员对灵活探视模式的看法:一项横断面研究。
Rev Bras Ter Intensiva. 2022 Sep 19;34(3):374-379. doi: 10.5935/0103-507X.20220114-pt. eCollection 2022.
5
Engaging Families in Adult Cardiovascular Care: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.《美国心脏协会成人心血管护理中的家庭参与科学声明》
J Am Heart Assoc. 2022 May 17;11(10):e025859. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.122.025859. Epub 2022 Apr 21.
6
Integrating the Choosing Wisely 5 Questions into Family Meetings in the Intensive Care Unit: A Randomized Controlled Trial Investigating the Effect on Family Perceived Involvement in Decision-Making.将明智选择的5个问题纳入重症监护病房的家庭会议:一项关于对家庭感知决策参与度影响的随机对照试验
J Patient Exp. 2022 Apr 11;9:23743735221092623. doi: 10.1177/23743735221092623. eCollection 2022.
7
Communication expectations of critically ill patients and their families.重症患者及其家属的沟通期望。
J Emerg Crit Care Med. 2019 Sep;3. doi: 10.21037/jeccm.2019.09.02. Epub 2019 Sep 20.
8
Interventions to promote family member involvement in adult critical care settings: a systematic review.促进家庭成员参与成人重症监护环境的干预措施:一项系统综述。
BMJ Open. 2021 Apr 7;11(4):e042556. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-042556.
9
A multifaceted study of hospital variables and interventions to improve inpatient satisfaction in a multi-hospital system.多医院系统中改善住院患者满意度的医院变量和干预措施的多方面研究。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Dec 18;99(51):e23669. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000023669.
10
State anxiety, uncertainty in illness, and needs of family members of critically ill patients and their experiences with family-centered multidisciplinary rounds: A mixed model study.危重症患者家属的状态焦虑、疾病不确定性和需求,以及他们对以家庭为中心的多学科查房的体验:一项混合模型研究。
PLoS One. 2020 Jun 9;15(6):e0234296. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0234296. eCollection 2020.