Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Centre, PO Box 2040, 3000 CA Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Eur Heart J. 2013 Oct;34(37):2873-86. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/eht284.
Since first introduced in the mid-1960s, coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) has become the standard of care for patients with coronary artery disease. Surprisingly, the fundamental surgical technique itself did not change much over time. Nevertheless, outcomes after CABG have dramatically improved over the first 50 years. Randomized trials comparing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) to CABG have shown converging outcomes for select patient populations, providing more evidence for wider use of PCI. It is increasingly important to focus on the optimization of the short- and long-term outcomes of CABG and to reduce the level of invasiveness of this procedure. This review provides an overview on how new techniques and widespread consideration of evolving strategies have the potential to optimize outcomes after CABG. Such developments include off-pump CABG, clampless/anaortic CABG, minimally invasive CABG with or without extending to hybrid procedures, arterial revascularization, endoscopic vein harvesting, intraprocedural epiaortic scanning, graft flow assessment, and improved secondary prevention measures. In addition, this review represents a framework for future studies by summarizing the areas that need more rigorous clinical (randomized) evaluation.
自 20 世纪 60 年代中期首次引入以来,冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)已成为冠心病患者的标准治疗方法。令人惊讶的是,该手术的基本技术本身并没有随着时间的推移发生太大变化。然而,在过去的 50 年中,CABG 的治疗效果有了显著的改善。比较经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)与 CABG 的随机试验表明,对于特定患者群体,两者的结果趋同,为更广泛地应用 PCI 提供了更多证据。越来越重要的是要关注 CABG 的短期和长期治疗效果的优化,并降低该手术的侵入性程度。这篇综述概述了新技术和广泛考虑不断发展的策略如何有可能优化 CABG 后的治疗效果。这些发展包括非体外循环 CABG、无夹闭/无主动脉 CABG、微创 CABG 加或不加杂交手术、动脉血运重建、内镜静脉采集、腔内主动脉外膜扫描、移植物血流评估以及改进的二级预防措施。此外,该综述通过总结需要更严格的临床(随机)评估的领域,为未来的研究提供了一个框架。