Suppr超能文献

高血压远程医疗干预中的血压控制:与初级保健的距离是否重要?

Blood pressure control in a hypertension telemedicine intervention: does distance to primary care matter?

机构信息

Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX; Division of Outcomes and Health Services Research, Department of Clinical Sciences, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX; Geriatric Research Education and Clinical Center (GRECC), VA Tennessee Valley Healthcare System, Nashville, TN.

出版信息

J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2013 Oct;15(10):723-30. doi: 10.1111/jch.12172. Epub 2013 Jul 23.

Abstract

Although telemedicine may help overcome geographic access barriers, it is unknown whether rural patients receive greater benefits. In a secondary analysis of 503 veterans participating in a hypertension telemedicine study, the authors hypothesized that patients with greater travel distances would have greater improvements in 18-month systolic blood pressure (SBP). Patients were categorized by telemedicine exposure and travel distance to primary care, derived from zip codes. Comparisons were (1) usual care (UC), distance <30 miles (reference); (2) UC, distance ≥30 miles; (3) telemedicine, distance <30 miles; (4) telemedicine, distance ≥30 miles. Compared with patients receiving UC, distance <30 miles (intercept=127.7), no difference in 18-month SBP was observed in patients receiving UC, distance ≥30 miles (0.13 mm Hg, 95% confidence interval [-6.6 to 6.8]); telemedicine, distance <30 miles (-1.1 mm Hg [-7.3 to 5.2]); telemedicine, distance ≥30 miles (-0.80 mm Hg [-6.6 to 5.1]). Although telemedicine may help overcome geographic access barriers, additional studies are needed to identify patients most likely to benefit.

摘要

尽管远程医疗可能有助于克服地理上的获取障碍,但尚不清楚农村患者是否能从中获得更大的益处。在一项对参与高血压远程医疗研究的 503 名退伍军人的二次分析中,作者假设,旅行距离较远的患者在 18 个月时收缩压(SBP)的改善幅度会更大。根据邮政编码,患者根据远程医疗的暴露情况和到初级保健的旅行距离进行分类。比较情况包括:(1)常规护理(UC),距离<30 英里(参考);(2)UC,距离≥30 英里;(3)远程医疗,距离<30 英里;(4)远程医疗,距离≥30 英里。与接受 UC 的患者相比,接受 UC 且距离<30 英里的患者(截距=127.7),在接受 UC 且距离≥30 英里的患者中,18 个月时的 SBP 没有差异(0.13 毫米汞柱,95%置信区间[-6.6 至 6.8]);远程医疗,距离<30 英里(-1.1 毫米汞柱[-7.3 至 5.2]);远程医疗,距离≥30 英里(-0.80 毫米汞柱[-6.6 至 5.1])。尽管远程医疗可能有助于克服地理上的获取障碍,但需要进一步研究以确定最有可能受益的患者。

相似文献

9
VA Telemedicine: An Analysis of Cost and Time Savings.退伍军人事务部远程医疗:成本与时间节省情况分析
Telemed J E Health. 2016 Mar;22(3):209-15. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2015.0055. Epub 2015 Aug 25.

本文引用的文献

1
Rural areas may benefit most.农村地区可能受益最大。
BMJ. 2012 Aug 6;345:e5204. doi: 10.1136/bmj.e5204.
6
A re-conceptualization of access for 21st century healthcare.重新构想 21 世纪医疗保健的可及性。
J Gen Intern Med. 2011 Nov;26 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):639-47. doi: 10.1007/s11606-011-1806-6.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验