Department of Health, Fresenius University of Applied Sciences, Limburger Straße 2, 65510 Idstein, Germany.
Gait Posture. 2014;39(1):518-22. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2013.09.001. Epub 2013 Sep 14.
The quantification of postural sway is considered to be an essential part of posturography and is important for research and clinical utility. A widely used method to calculate the scatter of center of pressure data is an ellipse that encloses about 100(1-α)% of the observations. However, underlying definitions and terminologies have been misused in many cases. Hence, outcomes of different studies are proved to be incommensurable. In order to attain inter-study comparability, standardization of calculation methods has to be advanced. This work features a comprehensive and consistent overview of the methods for elliptic area approximation contrasting general principles of confidence and prediction regions. As a result, we recommend the usage of the prediction ellipse, as far as we demonstrate that confidence ellipses emerge to be inappropriate for posturographic scatter evaluation. Furthermore, we point at problems that come along with different sample sizes.
姿势摆动的量化被认为是姿势描记法的一个基本组成部分,对于研究和临床应用都很重要。一种广泛使用的计算压力中心数据离散程度的方法是一个椭圆,它包围了大约 100(1-α)%的观测值。然而,在许多情况下,基本定义和术语被滥用了。因此,不同研究的结果被证明是不可比较的。为了实现研究间的可比性,必须推进计算方法的标准化。这项工作全面而一致地对比了置信区间和预测区间的一般原理,介绍了用于椭圆区域逼近的方法。因此,我们建议使用预测椭圆,因为我们证明置信椭圆不适用于姿势描记术的散射评估。此外,我们还指出了不同样本大小带来的问题。