Suppr超能文献

坦桑尼亚农村地区宫颈癌筛查的促进因素与障碍

Promoters of and barriers to cervical cancer screening in a rural setting in Tanzania.

作者信息

Perng Powell, Perng Wei, Ngoma Twalib, Kahesa Crispin, Mwaiselage Julius, Merajver Sofia D, Soliman Amr S

机构信息

Center for Global Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, USA; Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, USA.

出版信息

Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2013 Dec;123(3):221-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2013.05.026. Epub 2013 Sep 4.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To investigate promoters and barriers for cervical cancer screening in rural Tanzania.

METHODS

We interviewed 300 women of reproductive age living in Kiwangwa village, Tanzania. The odds of attending a free, 2-day screening service were compared with sociodemographic variables, lifestyle factors, and knowledge and attitudes surrounding cervical cancer using multivariable logistic regression.

RESULTS

Compared with women who did not attend the screening service (n=195), women who attended (n=105) were older (OR 4.29; 95% CI, 1.61-11.48, age 40-49years versus 20-29years), listened regularly to the radio (OR 24.76; 95% CI, 11.49-53.33, listened to radio 1-3 times per week versus not at all), had a poorer quality of life (OR 4.91; CI, 1.96-12.32, lowest versus highest score), had faced cost barriers to obtaining health care in the preceding year (OR 2.24; 95% CI, 1.11-4.53, yes versus no), and held a more positive attitude toward cervical cancer screening (OR 4.64; 95% CI, 1.39-15.55, least versus most averse).

CONCLUSION

Efforts aimed at improving screening rates in rural Tanzania need to address both structural and individual-level barriers, including knowledge and awareness of cervical cancer prevention, cost barriers to care, and access to health information.

摘要

目的

调查坦桑尼亚农村地区宫颈癌筛查的促进因素和障碍。

方法

我们采访了居住在坦桑尼亚基旺瓦村的300名育龄妇女。使用多变量逻辑回归分析,将参加为期2天免费筛查服务的几率与社会人口统计学变量、生活方式因素以及围绕宫颈癌的知识和态度进行比较。

结果

与未参加筛查服务的女性(n = 195)相比,参加筛查的女性(n = 105)年龄更大(比值比4.29;95%置信区间,1.61 - 11.48,40 - 49岁与20 - 29岁),经常收听广播(比值比24.76;95%置信区间,11.49 - 53.33,每周收听1 - 3次与完全不听),生活质量较差(比值比4.91;置信区间,1.96 - 12.32,最低分数与最高分数),在前一年面临获得医疗保健的费用障碍(比值比2.24;95%置信区间,1.11 - 4.53,是与否),并且对宫颈癌筛查持更积极的态度(比值比4.64;95%置信区间,1.39 - 15.55,最不反感与最反感)。

结论

旨在提高坦桑尼亚农村地区筛查率的努力需要解决结构和个人层面的障碍,包括宫颈癌预防的知识和意识、医疗保健的费用障碍以及健康信息的获取。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/efb6/4291064/7b4fc0f80844/nihms650326f1.jpg

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

5
The global burden of cancer: priorities for prevention.全球癌症负担:预防重点。
Carcinogenesis. 2010 Jan;31(1):100-10. doi: 10.1093/carcin/bgp263. Epub 2009 Nov 24.
10
A critical assessment of screening methods for cervical neoplasia.子宫颈肿瘤筛查方法的批判性评估。
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2005 May;89 Suppl 2:S4-S12. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2005.01.009.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验