University of Utah, Department of Bioengineering, College of Engineering, Salt Lake City, 84112, USA.
J Control Release. 2013 Dec 28;172(3):1045-64. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2013.09.026. Epub 2013 Oct 2.
With countless research papers using preclinical models and showing the superiority of nanoparticle design over current drug therapies used to treat cancers, it is surprising how deficient the translation of these nano-sized drug carriers into the clinical setting is. This review article seeks to compare the preclinical and clinical results for Doxil®, PK1, Abraxane®, Genexol-PM®, Xyotax™, NC-6004, Mylotarg®, PK2, and CALAA-01. While not comprehensive, it covers nano-sized drug carriers designed to improve the efficacy of common drugs used in chemotherapy. While not always available or comparable, effort was made to compare the pharmacokinetics, toxicity, and efficacy between the animal and human studies. Discussion is provided to suggest what might be causing the gap. Finally, suggestions and encouragement are dispensed for the potential that nano-sized drug carriers hold.
有无数的研究论文使用临床前模型,展示了纳米颗粒设计优于目前用于治疗癌症的药物疗法的优势,但令人惊讶的是,这些纳米级药物载体在临床环境中的转化是多么不足。本文旨在比较 Doxil®、PK1、Abraxane®、Genexol-PM®、Xyotax™、NC-6004、Mylotarg®、PK2 和 CALAA-01 的临床前和临床结果。虽然不全面,但它涵盖了旨在提高化疗中常用药物疗效的纳米级药物载体。虽然并非总是可用或可比,但我们努力比较了动物和人体研究之间的药代动力学、毒性和疗效。讨论提供了导致差距的原因。最后,为纳米级药物载体的潜力提供了建议和鼓励。