Institute of Sports Medicine Copenhagen, Bispebjerg Hospital, , Copenhagen NV, Denmark.
Br J Sports Med. 2014 Jun;48(11):871-7. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2013-092538. Epub 2013 Oct 7.
Physical activity is important in both prevention and treatment of many common diseases, but sports injuries can pose serious problems.
To determine whether physical activity exercises can reduce sports injuries and perform stratified analyses of strength training, stretching, proprioception and combinations of these, and provide separate acute and overuse injury estimates.
PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science and SPORTDiscus were searched and yielded 3462 results. Two independent authors selected relevant randomised, controlled trials and quality assessments were conducted by all authors of this paper using the Cochrane collaboration domain-based quality assessment tool. Twelve studies that neglected to account for clustering effects were adjusted. Quantitative analyses were performed in STATA V.12 and sensitivity analysed by intention-to-treat. Heterogeneity (I(2)) and publication bias (Harbord's small-study effects) were formally tested.
25 trials, including 26 610 participants with 3464 injuries, were analysed. The overall effect estimate on injury prevention was heterogeneous. Stratified exposure analyses proved no beneficial effect for stretching (RR 0.963 (0.846-1.095)), whereas studies with multiple exposures (RR 0.655 (0.520-0.826)), proprioception training (RR 0.550 (0.347-0.869)), and strength training (RR 0.315 (0.207-0.480)) showed a tendency towards increasing effect. Both acute injuries (RR 0.647 (0.502-0.836)) and overuse injuries (RR 0.527 (0.373-0.746)) could be reduced by physical activity programmes. Intention-to-treat sensitivity analyses consistently revealed even more robust effect estimates.
Despite a few outlying studies, consistently favourable estimates were obtained for all injury prevention measures except for stretching. Strength training reduced sports injuries to less than 1/3 and overuse injuries could be almost halved.
体力活动对于预防和治疗许多常见疾病都很重要,但运动损伤也可能带来严重的问题。
确定体力活动锻炼是否可以减少运动损伤,并对力量训练、伸展运动、本体感觉和这些运动的组合进行分层分析,同时提供急性和过度使用损伤的单独估计。
在 PubMed、EMBASE、Web of Science 和 SPORTDiscus 中进行了检索,共得到 3462 项结果。两位独立的作者选择了相关的随机对照试验,并由本文的所有作者使用 Cochrane 协作基于领域的质量评估工具进行了质量评估。对 12 项未考虑到聚类效应的研究进行了调整。在 STATA V.12 中进行了定量分析,并通过意向治疗进行了敏感性分析。正式测试了异质性(I²)和发表偏倚(Harbord 小样本效应)。
共分析了 25 项试验,包括 26610 名参与者和 3464 例损伤。整体损伤预防效果估计存在异质性。分层暴露分析表明,伸展运动(RR 0.963(0.846-1.095))没有有益效果,而多暴露(RR 0.655(0.520-0.826))、本体感觉训练(RR 0.550(0.347-0.869))和力量训练(RR 0.315(0.207-0.480))的研究则显示出增加效果的趋势。急性损伤(RR 0.647(0.502-0.836))和过度使用损伤(RR 0.527(0.373-0.746))都可以通过体力活动方案来减少。意向治疗敏感性分析一致显示出更稳健的效果估计。
尽管有一些离群值研究,但除了伸展运动外,所有预防损伤的措施都得到了一致的有利估计。力量训练使运动损伤减少到不足 1/3,过度使用损伤几乎减半。