Suppr超能文献

医疗保险部分 D 是否减少了处方药使用和支出方面的种族/民族差异?

Has Medicare Part D reduced racial/ethnic disparities in prescription drug use and spending?

机构信息

Department of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.

出版信息

Health Serv Res. 2014 Apr;49(2):502-25. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12099. Epub 2013 Sep 18.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate whether Medicare Part D has reduced racial/ethnic disparities in prescription drug utilization and spending.

DATA

Nationally representative data on white, African American, and Hispanic Medicare seniors from the 2002-2009 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey are analyzed. Five measures are examined: filling any prescriptions during the year, the number of prescriptions filled, total annual prescription spending, annual out-of-pocket prescription spending, and average copay level.

STUDY DESIGN

We apply the Institute of Medicine's definition of a racial/ethnic disparity and adopt a difference-in-difference-in-differences (DDD) estimator using a multivariate regression framework. The treatment group consists of Medicare seniors, the comparison group, adults without Medicare aged 55-63 years.

PRINCIPAL FINDINGS

Difference-in-difference-in-differences estimates suggest that for African Americans Part D increased the disparity in annual spending on prescription drugs by $258 (p=.011), yet had no effect on other measures of prescription drug disparities. For Hispanics, DDD estimates suggest that the program reduced the disparities in annual number of prescriptions filled, annual total and out-of-pocket spending on prescription drugs by 2.9 (p=.077), $282 (p=.019) and $143 (p<.001), respectively.

CONCLUSION

Medicare Part D had mixed effects. Although it reduced Hispanic/white disparities related to prescription drugs among seniors, it increased the African American/white disparity in total annual spending on prescription drugs.

摘要

目的

评估医疗保险处方药计划是否减少了处方药物使用和支出方面的种族/民族差异。

数据

使用来自 2002-2009 年医疗支出面板调查的白人、非裔美国人和西班牙裔医疗保险老年人的全国代表性数据进行分析。检查了五种措施:当年开任何处方的情况、开的处方数量、总年度处方支出、年度自付处方支出和平均 copay 水平。

研究设计

我们应用医学研究所的种族/民族差异定义,并采用多元回归框架下的差异中的差异中的差异(DDD)估计量。治疗组由医疗保险老年人组成,对照组为 55-63 岁无医疗保险的成年人。

主要发现

差异中的差异中的差异估计表明,对于非裔美国人,Part D 增加了处方药年度支出方面的差异,增加了 258 美元(p=.011),但对其他处方药差异衡量指标没有影响。对于西班牙裔,DDD 估计表明,该计划减少了每年开处方数量、年度总处方和自付支出方面的差异,分别减少了 2.9(p=.077)、282 美元(p=.019)和 143 美元(p<.001)。

结论

医疗保险处方药计划有混合效果。虽然它减少了老年人中与处方药有关的西班牙裔/白人差异,但它增加了非裔美国人/白人在处方药总年度支出方面的差异。

相似文献

1
Has Medicare Part D reduced racial/ethnic disparities in prescription drug use and spending?
Health Serv Res. 2014 Apr;49(2):502-25. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12099. Epub 2013 Sep 18.
2
Effects of Medicare Part D on Racial/Ethnic Disparities in Hospital Utilization Among Seniors.
J Aging Health. 2015 Aug;27(5):797-826. doi: 10.1177/0898264315569450. Epub 2015 Feb 9.
3
Exploring racial and ethnic disparities in prescription drug spending and use among Medicare beneficiaries.
Am J Geriatr Pharmacother. 2006 Jun;4(2):96-111. doi: 10.1016/j.amjopharm.2006.06.008.
4
Racial and ethnic differences in drug expenditures and access under Medicare Part D.
J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2011 Aug;22(3):1059-74. doi: 10.1353/hpu.2011.0070.
6
Impact of Medicare Part D on Racial Disparities in Adherence to Cardiovascular Medications Among the Elderly.
Med Care Res Rev. 2016 Aug;73(4):410-36. doi: 10.1177/1077558715615297. Epub 2015 Nov 16.
7
Racial/ethnic disparities in Medicare Part D experiences.
Med Care. 2012 Nov;50 Suppl(Suppl):S40-7. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3182610aa5.
8
Racial-Ethnic Disparities in Uptake of New Hepatitis C Drugs in Medicare.
J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2017 Dec;4(6):1147-1158. doi: 10.1007/s40615-016-0320-2. Epub 2016 Dec 7.
9
How Did Medicare Part D Affect Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Drug Coverage?
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2016 May;71(3):581-9. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbu170. Epub 2014 Dec 22.
10
Racial and ethnic disparities in meeting Part D MTM eligibility criteria among the non-Medicare population.
J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2012 Sep-Oct;52(5):e87-96. doi: 10.1331/JAPhA.2012.11146.

引用本文的文献

1
Do MA plans follow incentives to attract enrollee groups with new supplemental benefits?
Health Aff Sch. 2025 Jul 31;3(9):qxaf153. doi: 10.1093/haschl/qxaf153. eCollection 2025 Sep.
2
Prescription Drug Utilization and Spending by Race, Ethnicity, Payer, Health Condition, and US State.
JAMA Health Forum. 2025 Aug 1;6(8):e252329. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2025.2329.
3
Effects of the Part D Senior Savings Model on racial and ethnic disparities in healthcare costs.
Curr Med Res Opin. 2025 Mar;41(3):431-440. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2025.2479780. Epub 2025 Mar 31.
4
Racial and Ethnic Inequities in Managing Prescription Drug Costs Among Older Adults in Medicare.
J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2025 Mar 3. doi: 10.1007/s40615-025-02329-5.
5
Trends in Racial Disparities in Healthcare Expenditures Among Senior Medicare Fee-for-service Enrollees in 2007-2020.
J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2024 Dec;11(6):3807-3817. doi: 10.1007/s40615-023-01832-x. Epub 2023 Nov 13.
6
Life Course Patterns of Prescription Drug Use in the United States.
Demography. 2023 Oct 1;60(5):1549-1579. doi: 10.1215/00703370-10965990.
8
Pharmaceutical policies: effects of regulating drug insurance schemes.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 3;5(5):CD011703. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011703.pub2.
9
The impact of expanding health insurance coverage for anti-cancer drugs on cancer survival in Korea.
Cancer Med. 2021 Jul;10(13):4555-4563. doi: 10.1002/cam4.3979. Epub 2021 Jun 18.
10
The impact of Medicare part D on income-related inequality in pharmaceutical expenditure.
Int J Equity Health. 2019 Apr 16;18(1):57. doi: 10.1186/s12939-019-0955-9.

本文引用的文献

1
Exploring disparities in access to physician services among older adults: 2000-2007.
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2013 Jan;68(1):128-38. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbs105. Epub 2012 Dec 4.
2
Diverging racial and ethnic disparities in access to physician care: comparing 2000 and 2007.
Med Care. 2012 Apr;50(4):327-34. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e318245a111.
3
An economic history of Medicare part C.
Milbank Q. 2011 Jun;89(2):289-332. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0009.2011.00629.x.
6
Comparing methods of racial and ethnic disparities measurement across different settings of mental health care.
Health Serv Res. 2010 Jun;45(3):825-47. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2010.01100.x. Epub 2010 Mar 9.
7
Take-up of Medicare Part D: results from the Health and Retirement Study.
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2010 Jul;65(4):492-501. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbp107. Epub 2009 Dec 24.
8
Impact of Medicare Part D on Medicare-Medicaid dual-eligible beneficiaries' prescription utilization and expenditures.
Health Serv Res. 2010 Feb;45(1):133-51. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2009.01065.x. Epub 2009 Dec 4.
9
Prescription coverage, use and spending before and after Part D implementation: a national longitudinal panel study.
J Gen Intern Med. 2010 Jan;25(1):10-7. doi: 10.1007/s11606-009-1134-2. Epub 2009 Oct 31.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验