• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医疗保险部分 D 是否减少了处方药使用和支出方面的种族/民族差异?

Has Medicare Part D reduced racial/ethnic disparities in prescription drug use and spending?

机构信息

Department of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.

出版信息

Health Serv Res. 2014 Apr;49(2):502-25. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12099. Epub 2013 Sep 18.

DOI:10.1111/1475-6773.12099
PMID:24102408
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3976184/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate whether Medicare Part D has reduced racial/ethnic disparities in prescription drug utilization and spending.

DATA

Nationally representative data on white, African American, and Hispanic Medicare seniors from the 2002-2009 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey are analyzed. Five measures are examined: filling any prescriptions during the year, the number of prescriptions filled, total annual prescription spending, annual out-of-pocket prescription spending, and average copay level.

STUDY DESIGN

We apply the Institute of Medicine's definition of a racial/ethnic disparity and adopt a difference-in-difference-in-differences (DDD) estimator using a multivariate regression framework. The treatment group consists of Medicare seniors, the comparison group, adults without Medicare aged 55-63 years.

PRINCIPAL FINDINGS

Difference-in-difference-in-differences estimates suggest that for African Americans Part D increased the disparity in annual spending on prescription drugs by $258 (p=.011), yet had no effect on other measures of prescription drug disparities. For Hispanics, DDD estimates suggest that the program reduced the disparities in annual number of prescriptions filled, annual total and out-of-pocket spending on prescription drugs by 2.9 (p=.077), $282 (p=.019) and $143 (p<.001), respectively.

CONCLUSION

Medicare Part D had mixed effects. Although it reduced Hispanic/white disparities related to prescription drugs among seniors, it increased the African American/white disparity in total annual spending on prescription drugs.

摘要

目的

评估医疗保险处方药计划是否减少了处方药物使用和支出方面的种族/民族差异。

数据

使用来自 2002-2009 年医疗支出面板调查的白人、非裔美国人和西班牙裔医疗保险老年人的全国代表性数据进行分析。检查了五种措施:当年开任何处方的情况、开的处方数量、总年度处方支出、年度自付处方支出和平均 copay 水平。

研究设计

我们应用医学研究所的种族/民族差异定义,并采用多元回归框架下的差异中的差异中的差异(DDD)估计量。治疗组由医疗保险老年人组成,对照组为 55-63 岁无医疗保险的成年人。

主要发现

差异中的差异中的差异估计表明,对于非裔美国人,Part D 增加了处方药年度支出方面的差异,增加了 258 美元(p=.011),但对其他处方药差异衡量指标没有影响。对于西班牙裔,DDD 估计表明,该计划减少了每年开处方数量、年度总处方和自付支出方面的差异,分别减少了 2.9(p=.077)、282 美元(p=.019)和 143 美元(p<.001)。

结论

医疗保险处方药计划有混合效果。虽然它减少了老年人中与处方药有关的西班牙裔/白人差异,但它增加了非裔美国人/白人在处方药总年度支出方面的差异。

相似文献

1
Has Medicare Part D reduced racial/ethnic disparities in prescription drug use and spending?医疗保险部分 D 是否减少了处方药使用和支出方面的种族/民族差异?
Health Serv Res. 2014 Apr;49(2):502-25. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12099. Epub 2013 Sep 18.
2
Effects of Medicare Part D on Racial/Ethnic Disparities in Hospital Utilization Among Seniors.医疗保险D部分对老年人住院利用方面种族/民族差异的影响。
J Aging Health. 2015 Aug;27(5):797-826. doi: 10.1177/0898264315569450. Epub 2015 Feb 9.
3
Exploring racial and ethnic disparities in prescription drug spending and use among Medicare beneficiaries.探索医疗保险受益人群中处方药支出和使用方面的种族和族裔差异。
Am J Geriatr Pharmacother. 2006 Jun;4(2):96-111. doi: 10.1016/j.amjopharm.2006.06.008.
4
Racial and ethnic differences in drug expenditures and access under Medicare Part D.医疗保险D部分下药物支出和获取方面的种族和族裔差异。
J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2011 Aug;22(3):1059-74. doi: 10.1353/hpu.2011.0070.
5
Racial and ethnic disparities in the financial burden of prescription drugs among older Americans.美国老年人在处方药经济负担方面的种族和族裔差异。
J Health Hum Serv Adm. 2007 Summer;30(1):28-49.
6
Impact of Medicare Part D on Racial Disparities in Adherence to Cardiovascular Medications Among the Elderly.医疗保险D部分对老年人心血管药物依从性种族差异的影响。
Med Care Res Rev. 2016 Aug;73(4):410-36. doi: 10.1177/1077558715615297. Epub 2015 Nov 16.
7
Racial/ethnic disparities in Medicare Part D experiences.医疗保险计划 D 部分的种族/民族差异。
Med Care. 2012 Nov;50 Suppl(Suppl):S40-7. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3182610aa5.
8
Racial-Ethnic Disparities in Uptake of New Hepatitis C Drugs in Medicare.医疗保险中新型丙型肝炎药物使用的种族-民族差异。
J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2017 Dec;4(6):1147-1158. doi: 10.1007/s40615-016-0320-2. Epub 2016 Dec 7.
9
How Did Medicare Part D Affect Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Drug Coverage?医疗保险D部分如何影响药物覆盖方面的种族和族裔差异?
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2016 May;71(3):581-9. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbu170. Epub 2014 Dec 22.
10
Racial and ethnic disparities in meeting Part D MTM eligibility criteria among the non-Medicare population.非老年人口在满足 Part D MTM 资格标准方面的种族和民族差异。
J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2012 Sep-Oct;52(5):e87-96. doi: 10.1331/JAPhA.2012.11146.

引用本文的文献

1
Do MA plans follow incentives to attract enrollee groups with new supplemental benefits?医疗补助计划是否会遵循激励措施来吸引具有新补充福利的参保人群?
Health Aff Sch. 2025 Jul 31;3(9):qxaf153. doi: 10.1093/haschl/qxaf153. eCollection 2025 Sep.
2
Prescription Drug Utilization and Spending by Race, Ethnicity, Payer, Health Condition, and US State.按种族、民族、付款人、健康状况和美国州划分的处方药使用情况及支出
JAMA Health Forum. 2025 Aug 1;6(8):e252329. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2025.2329.
3
Effects of the Part D Senior Savings Model on racial and ethnic disparities in healthcare costs.D部分老年人储蓄模式对医疗保健费用中种族和民族差异的影响。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2025 Mar;41(3):431-440. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2025.2479780. Epub 2025 Mar 31.
4
Racial and Ethnic Inequities in Managing Prescription Drug Costs Among Older Adults in Medicare.医疗保险中老年人处方药费用管理方面的种族和族裔不平等问题。
J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2025 Mar 3. doi: 10.1007/s40615-025-02329-5.
5
Trends in Racial Disparities in Healthcare Expenditures Among Senior Medicare Fee-for-service Enrollees in 2007-2020.2007-2020 年 Medicare 按服务收费的老年参保者医疗支出中的种族差异趋势。
J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2024 Dec;11(6):3807-3817. doi: 10.1007/s40615-023-01832-x. Epub 2023 Nov 13.
6
Life Course Patterns of Prescription Drug Use in the United States.美国人处方药使用的生命历程模式。
Demography. 2023 Oct 1;60(5):1549-1579. doi: 10.1215/00703370-10965990.
7
Racial/ethnic disparities in the enrollment of Medication Therapy Management programs among Medicare beneficiaries with Alzheimer's disease and related dementias.在 Medicare 受益人群中,患有阿尔茨海默病和相关痴呆症的患者中,药物治疗管理项目的入组存在种族/民族差异。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2022 Oct;38(10):1715-1725. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2022.2103962. Epub 2022 Aug 9.
8
Pharmaceutical policies: effects of regulating drug insurance schemes.药品政策:规范药品保险计划的影响
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 3;5(5):CD011703. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011703.pub2.
9
The impact of expanding health insurance coverage for anti-cancer drugs on cancer survival in Korea.扩大抗癌药物医疗保险覆盖范围对韩国癌症患者生存的影响。
Cancer Med. 2021 Jul;10(13):4555-4563. doi: 10.1002/cam4.3979. Epub 2021 Jun 18.
10
The impact of Medicare part D on income-related inequality in pharmaceutical expenditure.医疗保险 D 部分对药品支出与收入相关不平等的影响。
Int J Equity Health. 2019 Apr 16;18(1):57. doi: 10.1186/s12939-019-0955-9.

本文引用的文献

1
Exploring disparities in access to physician services among older adults: 2000-2007.探究老年人获得医生服务方面的差异:2000-2007 年。
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2013 Jan;68(1):128-38. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbs105. Epub 2012 Dec 4.
2
Diverging racial and ethnic disparities in access to physician care: comparing 2000 and 2007.医生护理可及性方面的种族和民族差异正在扩大:比较 2000 年和 2007 年。
Med Care. 2012 Apr;50(4):327-34. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e318245a111.
3
An economic history of Medicare part C.医疗保险 C 部分的经济史。
Milbank Q. 2011 Jun;89(2):289-332. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0009.2011.00629.x.
4
The impact of Medicare Part D on out-of-pocket costs for prescription drugs, medication utilization, health resource utilization, and preference-based health utility.医疗保险处方药部分对处方药自付费用、药物利用、卫生资源利用和基于偏好的健康效用的影响。
Health Serv Res. 2011 Aug;46(4):1104-23. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2011.01273.x. Epub 2011 May 24.
5
Cost sharing, adherence, and health outcomes in patients with diabetes.糖尿病患者的费用分担、依从性和健康结果。
Am J Manag Care. 2010 Aug;16(8):589-600.
6
Comparing methods of racial and ethnic disparities measurement across different settings of mental health care.比较不同心理健康护理环境下种族和民族差异测量方法。
Health Serv Res. 2010 Jun;45(3):825-47. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2010.01100.x. Epub 2010 Mar 9.
7
Take-up of Medicare Part D: results from the Health and Retirement Study.医疗保险部分 D 的参保情况:来自健康与退休研究的结果。
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2010 Jul;65(4):492-501. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbp107. Epub 2009 Dec 24.
8
Impact of Medicare Part D on Medicare-Medicaid dual-eligible beneficiaries' prescription utilization and expenditures.医疗保险处方药部分对医疗保险-医疗补助双重资格受益人的处方使用和支出的影响。
Health Serv Res. 2010 Feb;45(1):133-51. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2009.01065.x. Epub 2009 Dec 4.
9
Prescription coverage, use and spending before and after Part D implementation: a national longitudinal panel study.处方覆盖范围、使用和支出在 Part D 实施前后:一项全国纵向面板研究。
J Gen Intern Med. 2010 Jan;25(1):10-7. doi: 10.1007/s11606-009-1134-2. Epub 2009 Oct 31.
10
Market and beneficiary characteristics associated with enrollment in Medicare managed care plans and fee-for-service.与参加医疗保险管理式医疗计划和按服务收费相关的市场及受益人群特征。
Med Care. 2009 May;47(5):517-23. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e318195f86e.