• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

床边巡视的价值:一项多中心定性研究。

The value of bedside rounds: a multicenter qualitative study.

机构信息

a Department of Medicine , Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine , Hershey , Pennsylvania , USA.

出版信息

Teach Learn Med. 2013;25(4):326-33. doi: 10.1080/10401334.2013.830514.

DOI:10.1080/10401334.2013.830514
PMID:24112202
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Bedside rounds have decreased on teaching services, raising concern about trainees' clinical skills and patient-physician relationships.

PURPOSE

We sought to identify recognized bedside teachers' perceived value of bedside rounds to assist in the promotion of bedside rounds on teaching services.

METHODS

Authors used a grounded theory, qualitative study design of telephone semistructured interviews with bedside teachers (n = 34) from 10 U.S. institutions (2010-2011). Main outcomes were characteristics of participants, themes pertaining to the perceived value of bedside rounds, and quotations highlighting each respective theme.

RESULTS

The mean years in academic medicine was 13.7, and 51% were associate or full professors. Six main themes emerged: (a) skill development for learners (e.g., physical examination, communication, and clinical decision-making skills); (b) observation and feedback; (c) role-modeling; (d) team building among trainees, attending, and patient; (e) improved patient care delivery through combined clinical decision-making and team consensus; and (f) the culture of medicine as patient-centered care, which was embodied in all themes.

CONCLUSIONS

Bedside teachers identify potential benefits of bedside rounds, many of which align with national calls to change our approach to medical education. The practice of bedside rounds enables activities essential to high-quality patient care and education.

摘要

背景

床边巡视在教学服务中减少了,这引起了人们对受训者临床技能和医患关系的关注。

目的

我们试图确定被认可的床边教师对床边巡视的感知价值,以帮助促进教学服务中的床边巡视。

方法

作者采用了一种扎根理论、定性研究设计,对来自 10 个美国机构的 34 名床边教师(2010-2011 年)进行了电话半结构化访谈。主要结果是参与者的特征、与床边巡视的感知价值有关的主题,以及突出每个主题的引文。

结果

从事学术医学的平均年限为 13.7 年,其中 51%为副教授或教授。出现了六个主要主题:(a)学习者技能的发展(例如,体格检查、沟通和临床决策技能);(b)观察和反馈;(c)模范作用;(d)受训者、主治医生和患者之间的团队建设;(e)通过联合临床决策和团队共识提高患者护理的提供;以及(f)以患者为中心的医疗文化,这体现在所有主题中。

结论

床边教师确定了床边巡视的潜在好处,其中许多与改变我们医学教育方法的国家号召一致。床边巡视的实践使高质量患者护理和教育所必需的活动成为可能。

相似文献

1
The value of bedside rounds: a multicenter qualitative study.床边巡视的价值:一项多中心定性研究。
Teach Learn Med. 2013;25(4):326-33. doi: 10.1080/10401334.2013.830514.
2
Identifying and overcoming the barriers to bedside rounds: a multicenter qualitative study.确定并克服床边查房障碍:一项多中心定性研究。
Acad Med. 2014 Feb;89(2):326-34. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000100.
3
The art of bedside rounds: a multi-center qualitative study of strategies used by experienced bedside teachers.床边查房的艺术:一项多中心定性研究,探讨经验丰富的床边教师所使用的策略。
J Gen Intern Med. 2013 Mar;28(3):412-20. doi: 10.1007/s11606-012-2259-2. Epub 2012 Nov 6.
4
Human dimensions in bedside teaching: focus group discussions of teachers and learners.床边教学中的人文关怀:教师和学习者的焦点小组讨论。
Teach Learn Med. 2013;25(4):312-8. doi: 10.1080/10401334.2013.827979.
5
Content and timing of feedback and reflection: a multi-center qualitative study of experienced bedside teachers.反馈与反思的内容及时机:一项针对经验丰富的床边带教老师的多中心定性研究
BMC Med Educ. 2014 Oct 10;14:212. doi: 10.1186/1472-6920-14-212.
6
MiPLAN: a learner-centered model for bedside teaching in today's academic medical centers.MiPLAN:一种以学习者为中心的模型,用于当今学术医疗中心的床边教学。
Acad Med. 2013 Mar;88(3):322-7. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e318280d8f7.
7
The Importance of Situational Awareness: A Qualitative Study of Family Members' and Nurses' Perspectives on Teaching During Family-Centered Rounds.情境意识的重要性:一项关于家庭照护者和护士对以家庭为中心的查房教学看法的定性研究。
Acad Med. 2015 Oct;90(10):1401-7. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000810.
8
Patient Satisfaction with Bedside Teaching Rounds Compared with Nonbedside Rounds.与非床边查房相比,患者对床边教学查房的满意度。
South Med J. 2016 Feb;109(2):112-5. doi: 10.14423/SMJ.0000000000000419.
9
Patient-Centered Bedside Rounds and the Clinical Examination.以患者为中心的床边查房与临床检查。
Med Clin North Am. 2018 May;102(3):509-519. doi: 10.1016/j.mcna.2017.12.012.
10
Quantification of bedside teaching by an academic hospitalist group.学术医院医生团队对床边教学的量化评估
J Hosp Med. 2009 May;4(5):304-7. doi: 10.1002/jhm.540.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the clinical performance of medical students: a retrospective study in Korea.新型冠状病毒肺炎大流行对医学生临床能力的影响:韩国的一项回顾性研究
Korean J Med Educ. 2025 Jun;37(2):143-152. doi: 10.3946/kjme.2025.331. Epub 2025 May 29.
2
Framing the Multi-Centre Qualitative Research Design as a Novel Methodology for Nursing and Healthcare Research: Reflections and A Methodological Discussion.将多中心定性研究设计构建为护理与医疗保健研究的一种新方法:思考与方法学探讨
J Adv Nurs. 2024 Oct 24. doi: 10.1111/jan.16548.
3
How is modern bedside teaching structured? A video analysis of learning content, social and spatial structures.
现代床边教学是如何组织的?一项关于学习内容、社会和空间结构的视频分析。
BMC Med Educ. 2022 Nov 15;22(1):790. doi: 10.1186/s12909-022-03855-0.
4
A systematic review of evidence-based practices for clinical education and health care delivery in the clinical teaching unit.基于循证实践的临床教学单元临床教育和医疗服务提供的系统评价。
CMAJ. 2022 Feb 14;194(6):E186-E194. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.202400.
5
A Weighted Evaluation Study of Clinical Teacher Performance at Five Hospitals in the UK.英国五家医院临床教师表现的加权评估研究。
Adv Med Educ Pract. 2021 Aug 26;12:957-963. doi: 10.2147/AMEP.S322105. eCollection 2021.
6
Relationships Between Time-at-Bedside During Hospital Ward Rounds, Clinician-Patient Agreement, and Patient Experience.医院查房时床边停留时间、医患一致性与患者体验之间的关系
J Patient Exp. 2021 Apr 8;8:23743735211008303. doi: 10.1177/23743735211008303. eCollection 2021.
7
Seven ways to get a grip on facilitating bedside team rounding.掌握床边团队查房促进工作的七种方法。
Can Med Educ J. 2021 Feb 26;12(1):e85-e88. doi: 10.36834/cmej.70481. eCollection 2021 Feb.
8
Analysis of patient safety messages delivered and received during clinical rounds.临床查房中传递和接收的患者安全信息分析。
BMJ Open Qual. 2020 Jul;9(3). doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2019-000869.
9
The purpose of ward rounds.查房的目的。
Ir J Med Sci. 2019 Aug;188(3):1071-1073. doi: 10.1007/s11845-018-1930-y. Epub 2018 Nov 13.
10
Convergent parallel mixed-methods study to understand information exchange in paediatric critical care and inform the development of safety-enhancing interventions: a protocol study.采用收敛平行混合方法研究以了解儿科重症监护中的信息交流并为安全增强干预措施的制定提供信息:一项方案研究。
BMJ Open. 2018 Sep 1;8(8):e023691. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023691.