Hallock Geoffrey G
Division of Plastic Surgery, Sacred Heart and The Lehigh Valley Hospitals, Allentown, Pennsylvania, St. Luke's Hospital, Bethlehem, Pennsylvania.
J Reconstr Microsurg. 2014 Mar;30(3):187-92. doi: 10.1055/s-0033-1357276. Epub 2013 Oct 10.
The medial sural artery perforator (MSAP) flap captures the cutaneous territory of the medial calf, and can potentially be advantageous as a thin free flap, even in the most obese individual, for coverage of most foot and/or ankle defects where bulk is a liability. The anatomy is fairly constant, as usually at least one reasonably large perforator can always be found emanating from the medial head of the gastrocnemius muscle. As a microsurgical tissue transfer, a long vascular pedicle of large caliber is routinely possible which facilitates any requisite microanastomoses.Over the past decade from our free flap registry, 14 patients with distal lower extremity wounds were covered specifically with a perforator flap based on the ipsilateral medial sural artery; out of which only 2 (14%) were females.In this series using a MSAP free flap, there was only one failure requiring salvage by a different free flap. All but one case was a sequel of trauma, and these involved all zones of the foot and ankle. A skin graft of the donor site was necessary in 5/14 (36%) patients. In no cases did the flap subsequently impede the use of shoes nor hinder ambulation.The study concluded the major disadvantage of the MSAP flap is the nonaesthetic scar left at the donor site which can be quite conspicuous, especially if a skin graft had to be used. Yet even this detriment can be acceptable for ipsilateral distal lower extremity defects where reconstruction of the defect itself may be cosmetically unappealing. This may be the best indication for the MSAP flap to be considered first as the free flap of choice.
腓肠内侧动脉穿支(MSAP)皮瓣覆盖小腿内侧的皮肤区域,即使对于最肥胖的个体,作为薄型游离皮瓣,它在覆盖大多数足部和/或踝部缺损(此处组织臃肿是个问题)时可能具有优势。其解剖结构相当恒定,因为通常总能找到至少一支来自腓肠肌内侧头的相当粗大的穿支。作为一种显微外科组织移植,通常可以获得口径较大的长血管蒂,这便于进行任何必要的显微吻合。在过去十年中,从我们的游离皮瓣登记资料来看,有14例下肢远端伤口患者专门采用了基于同侧腓肠内侧动脉的穿支皮瓣进行覆盖;其中只有2例(14%)为女性。在这个使用MSAP游离皮瓣的系列研究中,只有1例失败,需要用另一种游离皮瓣进行挽救。除1例之外,所有病例均为创伤后遗症,累及足部和踝部的所有区域。14例患者中有5例(36%)供区需要植皮。在所有病例中,皮瓣均未妨碍随后穿鞋,也未影响行走。该研究得出结论,MSAP皮瓣的主要缺点是供区会留下不美观的瘢痕,这可能相当明显,尤其是在必须使用植皮的情况下。然而,对于同侧下肢远端缺损,即使存在这一缺点也是可以接受的,因为缺损本身的重建在美观上可能也不尽人意。这可能是首先考虑将MSAP皮瓣作为游离皮瓣首选的最佳适应证。