• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

2002-2010 年犹他州与处方类阿片类药物致死相关的开方者专业特征。

Specialty of prescribers associated with prescription opioid fatalities in Utah, 2002-2010.

机构信息

Division of Public Health, Department of Family and Preventive Medicine, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.

出版信息

Pain Med. 2014 Jan;15(1):73-8. doi: 10.1111/pme.12247. Epub 2013 Oct 9.

DOI:10.1111/pme.12247
PMID:24118974
Abstract

UNLABELLED

Opioid adverse events are widespread, and deaths have been directly attributed to opioids prescribed by medical professionals. Little information exists on the amount of opioids various medical specialties prescribe and the opioid fatality rate that would be expected if prescription opioid-related deaths were independent of medical specialty.

OBJECTIVE

To compute the incidence of prescription opioid fatalities by medical specialty in Utah and to calculate the attributable risk (AR) of opioid fatality by medical specialty.

DESIGN

Prevalence database study design linking the Utah Controlled Substance Database (CSD) for prescribing data with the Utah Medical Examiner data to identify prescription opioid fatalities. AR were calculated for each medical specialty and year.

RESULTS

Opioid prescriptions are common with 23,302,892 recorded in the CSD for 2002-2010, 0.64% of which were associated with a fatality. We attached specialty to 90.2% of opioid prescriptions. Family medicine and internal medicine physicians wrote the largest proportion of prescriptions (24.1% and 10.8%) and were associated with the greatest number of prescription opioid fatalities. The number of active prescriptions at time of death decreased each year. The AR of fatality by provider specialty varied each year with some specialties, such as pain medicine and anesthesiology, consistently associated with more fatalities per 1,000 opioid prescriptions than internal medicine physicians the same year.

CONCLUSIONS

Primary care providers were the most frequent prescribers and the most often associated with opioid fatalities and should be targeted for education about safe prescribing along with specialties that prescribe less frequently but are associated with a positive AR for opioid fatality.

摘要

未加标签

阿片类药物不良反应广泛存在,且有死亡病例被直接归因于专业医务人员开具的阿片类药物。关于各个医学专业开具的阿片类药物数量以及如果将处方类阿片类药物相关死亡病例与医学专业分开考虑,预计的阿片类药物死亡率,相关信息很少。

目的

计算犹他州各医学专业的处方类阿片类药物死亡病例发生率,并计算各医学专业的阿片类药物死亡率归因风险(AR)。

设计

采用流行数据库研究设计,将犹他州管制物质数据库(CSD)的处方数据与犹他州法医数据进行链接,以确定处方类阿片类药物死亡病例。计算了各医学专业和各年的 AR。

结果

阿片类药物处方十分常见,在 2002 年至 2010 年的 CSD 中记录有 23302892 张,其中 0.64%与死亡有关。我们将专业信息与 90.2%的阿片类药物处方相关联。家庭医学和内科医生开具的处方比例最大(分别为 24.1%和 10.8%),与最多的处方类阿片类药物死亡病例有关。死亡时的有效处方数量逐年减少。每年各专业医生开具处方导致死亡的 AR 都有所不同,某些专业(如疼痛医学和麻醉学)始终与每 1000 张阿片类药物处方导致的更多死亡病例相关,而同年的内科医生则不然。

结论

初级保健提供者是最常见的处方开具者,也是最常与阿片类药物死亡相关的人群,应针对他们开展安全处方开具教育,此外,还应针对那些开具处方频率较低但 AR 值为阿片类药物死亡呈阳性的专业开展教育。

相似文献

1
Specialty of prescribers associated with prescription opioid fatalities in Utah, 2002-2010.2002-2010 年犹他州与处方类阿片类药物致死相关的开方者专业特征。
Pain Med. 2014 Jan;15(1):73-8. doi: 10.1111/pme.12247. Epub 2013 Oct 9.
2
Buprenorphine prescribing practices and exposures reported to a poison center--Utah, 2002-2011.向毒物中心报告的丁丙诺啡处方实践和暴露情况-犹他州,2002-2011 年。
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2012 Dec 14;61(49):997-1001.
3
Provider detailing: an intervention to decrease prescription opioid deaths in Utah.提供者详述:在犹他州减少处方类阿片类药物死亡的干预措施。
Pain Med. 2011 Jun;12 Suppl 2:S73-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4637.2011.01125.x.
4
Adult use of prescription opioid pain medications - Utah, 2008.成人使用处方类阿片类止痛药-犹他州,2008 年。
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2010 Feb 19;59(6):153-7.
5
Prescribing trends by nurse practitioners and physician assistants in the United States.美国执业护士和医师助理的处方开具趋势。
J Am Acad Nurse Pract. 2006 Jun;18(6):291-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-7599.2006.00133.x.
6
Identifying opioid prescribing patterns for high-volume prescribers via cluster analysis.通过聚类分析识别高用量处方医生的阿片类药物处方模式。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2019 Apr 1;197:250-254. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2019.01.012. Epub 2019 Feb 16.
7
Opioid Prescriptions by Specialty in Ohio, 2010-2014.俄亥俄州 2010-2014 年各专科医生的阿片类药物处方情况。
Pain Med. 2018 May 1;19(5):978-989. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnx027.
8
A statewide prescription monitoring program affects emergency department prescribing behaviors.全州范围的处方监测计划影响急诊处方行为。
Ann Emerg Med. 2010 Jul;56(1):19-23.e1-3. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2009.12.011. Epub 2010 Jan 4.
9
Candidate metrics for evaluating the impact of prescriber education on the safe use of extended-release/long-acting (ER/LA) opioid analgesics.用于评估处方者教育对缓释/长效(ER/LA)阿片类镇痛药安全使用影响的候选指标。
Pain Med. 2014 Sep;15(9):1558-68. doi: 10.1111/pme.12459. Epub 2014 May 15.
10
Opioid epidemic in the United States.美国的阿片类药物泛滥问题。
Pain Physician. 2012 Jul;15(3 Suppl):ES9-38.

引用本文的文献

1
Physicians' perception about predictors of opioid abuse in patients with chronic non-cancer pain: a Delphi study.医生对慢性非癌性疼痛患者阿片类药物滥用预测因素的看法:一项德尔菲研究。
Front Pain Res (Lausanne). 2023 Oct 19;4:1269018. doi: 10.3389/fpain.2023.1269018. eCollection 2023.
2
Association of opioid fills with centers for disease control and prevention opioid guidelines and payer coverage policies: physician, insurance and geographic factors.阿片类药物填充与疾病控制和预防中心阿片类药物指南和支付者覆盖政策的关联:医生、保险和地理因素。
Int J Clin Pharm. 2022 Apr;44(2):428-438. doi: 10.1007/s11096-021-01360-w. Epub 2021 Dec 2.
3
Association of 3 CDC opioid prescription guidelines for chronic pain and 2 payer pharmacy coverage changes on opioid initiation practices.
3 项疾病预防控制中心(CDC)慢性疼痛阿片类药物处方指南与 2 项支付方药房覆盖范围变化对阿片类药物起始使用实践的关联。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2021 Oct;27(10):1352-1364. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2021.27.10.1352.
4
Characteristics Associated With Opioid and Antibiotic Prescribing by Dentists.牙医开具阿片类药物和抗生素的相关特征。
Am J Prev Med. 2021 May;60(5):648-657. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2020.11.017. Epub 2021 Mar 19.
5
Care Coordination for Patients on Chronic Opioid Therapy Following Surgery: A Cohort Study.手术后慢性阿片类药物治疗患者的护理协调:一项队列研究。
Ann Surg. 2020 Aug;272(2):304-310. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003235.
6
Identification of barriers to safe opioid prescribing in primary care: a qualitative analysis of field notes collected through academic detailing.识别基层医疗中安全开具阿片类药物的障碍:对通过学术推广收集的现场记录进行定性分析。
Br J Gen Pract. 2020 Jul 30;70(697):e589-e597. doi: 10.3399/bjgp20X711737. Print 2020 Aug.
7
Strengths and weaknesses of existing data sources to support research to address the opioids crisis.现有数据来源在支持应对阿片类药物危机研究方面的优势与不足。
Prev Med Rep. 2019 Nov 6;17:101015. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2019.101015. eCollection 2020 Mar.
8
Differences in Opioid Prescribing Among Generalist Physicians, Nurse Practitioners, and Physician Assistants.全科医生、护士从业者和医师助理之间阿片类药物处方的差异。
Pain Med. 2020 Jan 1;21(1):76-83. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnz005.
9
Prevalence and incidence of prescription opioid analgesic use in Australia.澳大利亚处方类阿片类镇痛药的使用情况:流行率和发生率。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2019 Jan;85(1):202-215. doi: 10.1111/bcp.13792. Epub 2018 Nov 16.
10
Patterns of Initial Opioid Prescribing to Opioid-Naive Patients.初始阿片类药物处方模式:阿片类药物初治患者。
Ann Surg. 2020 Feb;271(2):290-295. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002969.