• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[中文阅读视力表的设计研究与分析的关键参数]

[The key parameters of design research and analysis of the Chinese reading visual acuity chart].

作者信息

Wang Chen-xiao, Liu Zhi-hui, Gao Ji-tuo, Guo Ying-xuan, He Ji-cang, Qu Jia, Lü Fan

机构信息

Eye Hospital, Wenzhou Medical College, Wenzhou 350027, China.

出版信息

Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi. 2013 Jun;49(6):536-40.

PMID:24119968
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Reading is a visual function human being used to understand environmental events based on writing materials. This study investigated the feasibility of reading visual acuity chart in assessment of reading ability by analysis of the key factors involved in the design of the visual acuity chart.

METHODS

The reading level was determined as grade 3 primary school with Song as the font and 30 characters included in the sentences. Each of the sentences consisted of 27 commonly-used Chinese characters (9 characters between any two punctuations) and 3 punctuations. There were no contextual clues between the 80 sentences selected. The characters had 13 different sizes with an increment of 0.1 log unit (e.g.1.2589) and 2.5 pt was determined as the critical threshold. Readable test for visual target was followed as (1) 29 candidates with a raw or corrected visual acuity (VA)of at least 1.0 were selected to read 80 selected sentences with the size of characters of 2.5 pt at a distance of 40 cm, (2) the time used for reading with the number of characters wrongly read was recorded, (3) 39 sentences were selected as visual targets based on reading speed, effective reading position and total number of character strokes, (4) The 39 selected sentences were then randomly divided into 3 groups with no significant difference among the groups in the 3 factors listed at (3) with paired t-test.

RESULTS

This reading visual chart was at level of Grade 3 primary school with a total stroke number of 165-210(Mean 185 ± 10), 13 font sizes a 0.1 log unit increment, a song pattern and 2.5 pt as the critical threshold. All candidates achieved 100% correct in reading test under 2.5 pt with an effective reading speed as 120.65-162 wpm (Mean 142.93 ± 11.80) and effective reading position as 36.03-61.48(Mean 48.85 ± 6.81). The reading test for the 3 groups of sentences showed effective reading speed as (142.49 ± 12.14) wpm,(142.86 ± 12.55) wpm and (143.44 ± 11.63) wpm respectively(t1-2 = -0.899, t2-3 = -1.295, t1-3 = -1.435). The reading position was 48.55 ± 6.69, 48.99 ± 7.49 and 49.00 ± 6.76, respectively(t1-2 = -1.019, t2-3 = -0.019, t1-3 = -0.816). The total number of character strokes was 185.54 ± 7.55, 187.69 ± 13.76 and 182.62 ± 8.17, respectively(t1-2 = 0.191, t2-3 = 1.385, t1-3 = 1.686).

CONCLUSIONS

A practical design of the Chinese reading visual chart should consider size, increment, legibility in selection of reading sentences. Reading visual acuity, critical threshold and effective reading speed could be used to express the reading visual function.

摘要

目的

阅读是人类基于书面材料来理解环境事件的一种视觉功能。本研究通过分析视力表设计中的关键因素,探讨阅读视力表在评估阅读能力方面的可行性。

方法

将阅读水平设定为小学三年级,字体为宋体,句子包含30个字符。每个句子由27个常用汉字(任意两个标点之间9个汉字)和3个标点组成。所选的80个句子之间没有上下文线索。汉字有13种不同大小,以0.1对数单位递增(如1.2589),并将2.5磅确定为临界阈值。视觉目标的可读性测试如下:(1)选择29名裸眼或矫正视力(VA)至少为1.0的受试者,在距离40厘米处阅读字符大小为2.5磅的80个选定句子;(2)记录阅读所用时间及读错的字符数;(3)根据阅读速度、有效阅读位置和总笔画数选择39个句子作为视觉目标;(4)将选定的39个句子随机分为3组,这3组在(3)中列出的3个因素上无显著差异,采用配对t检验。

结果

本阅读视力表为小学三年级水平,总笔画数为165 - 210(平均185±10),有13种字体大小以0.1对数单位递增,为宋体样式,2.5磅为临界阈值。所有受试者在2.5磅以下的阅读测试中正确率均达到100%,有效阅读速度为120.65 - 162词/分钟(平均142.93±11.80),有效阅读位置为36.03 - 61.48(平均48.85±6.81)。3组句子的阅读测试显示有效阅读速度分别为(142.49±12.14)词/分钟、(142.86±12.55)词/分钟和(143.44±11.63)词/分钟(t1 - 2 = -0.899,t2 - 3 = -1.295,t1 - 3 = -1.435)。阅读位置分别为48.55±6.69、48.99±7.49和49.00±6.76(t1 - 2 = -1.019,t2 - 3 = -0.019,t1 - 3 = -0.816)。总笔画数分别为185.54±7.55、187.69±13.76和182.62±8.17(t1 - 2 = 0.191,t2 - 3 = 1.385,t1 - 3 = 1.686)。

结论

中文阅读视力表的实用设计应考虑字号、递增幅度、阅读句子选择的易读性。阅读视力、临界阈值和有效阅读速度可用于表达阅读视觉功能。

相似文献

1
[The key parameters of design research and analysis of the Chinese reading visual acuity chart].[中文阅读视力表的设计研究与分析的关键参数]
Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi. 2013 Jun;49(6):536-40.
2
[Selection of Chinese characters for visual acuity charts using psychophysical methods].[运用心理物理学方法选择视力表汉字]
Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi. 2011 Jul;47(7):618-22.
3
[A comparison of Chinese reading parameters among rapid serial visual presentation, full screen and printed displays].快速序列视觉呈现、全屏显示和印刷显示下中文阅读参数的比较
Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi. 2007 Aug;43(8):704-8.
4
Development and validation of the Greek version of the MNREAD acuity chart.MNREAD视力表希腊语版本的开发与验证
Clin Exp Optom. 2013 Jan;96(1):25-31. doi: 10.1111/j.1444-0938.2012.00799.x. Epub 2012 Sep 11.
5
Developing a Logarithmic Chinese Reading Acuity Chart.开发对数中文阅读视力表。
Optom Vis Sci. 2017 Jun;94(6):714-724. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0000000000001081.
6
[The Dutch version of the Radner Reading Chart for assessing vision function].[用于评估视觉功能的拉德纳阅读图表荷兰语版本]
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2007 Nov 10;151(45):2494-7.
7
A new principle for the standardization of long paragraphs for reading speed analysis.一种用于阅读速度分析的长段落标准化新原则。
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2016 Jan;254(1):177-84. doi: 10.1007/s00417-015-3207-8. Epub 2015 Nov 5.
8
Korean version of the MNREAD acuity chart.韩国版 MNREAD 视力表。
Sci Rep. 2024 Mar 28;14(1):7429. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-57717-4.
9
Reliability of a standardized test in Swedish for evaluation of reading performance in healthy eyes. Interchart and test-retest analyses.用于评估健康眼中阅读表现的瑞典标准化测试的可靠性。图表内和测试后分析。
Acta Ophthalmol. 2014 Sep;92(6):557-62. doi: 10.1111/aos.12286. Epub 2013 Dec 21.
10
Development of the Portuguese version of a standardized reading test: the Radner-Coimbra Charts.葡萄牙语版标准化阅读测试的开发:拉德纳-科英布拉图表
Arq Bras Oftalmol. 2016 Jul-Aug;79(4):238-42. doi: 10.5935/0004-2749.20160068.