• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Infant VEP acuity measurements: analysis of individual differences and measurement error.

作者信息

Norcia A M, Tyler C W

出版信息

Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1985 Nov;61(5):359-69. doi: 10.1016/0013-4694(85)91026-0.

DOI:10.1016/0013-4694(85)91026-0
PMID:2412787
Abstract

The reliability of visual evoked potential (VEP) measurements of acuity was determined by estimating acuity for sinewave luminance gratings which were counterphase modulated at either 12 or 20 reversals/sec (rps). Gratings were swept in spatial frequency beyond the acuity limit and acuity was estimated from an extrapolation based on the last peak in the VEP amplitude versus spatial frequency function. Twenty-five infants ranging in age from 17 to 25 weeks were studied. Individual 10 sec sweeps resulted in records with a criterion response in 65-75% of trials. The reliability of acuities obtained from individual 10 sec sweeps was +/- 0.54 octaves at 95% confidence across 12 and 20 rps recording conditions (RMS error of +/- 0.27 octaves). The best acuity attained by each infant on either a single sweep, or on their vector average, was reliable to +/- 0.38 octaves at 95% confidence (RMS error of +/- 0.19 octaves) compared to a range of individual acuities of about 2 octaves. Much of the variability of sweep VEP acuity in cross-sectional samples of infants is therefore attributable to reliable individual differences rather than to measurement error. In testing individual infants our analysis indicates that choice of temporal frequency accounts for only 14% of the variation in acuity estimates within subjects.

摘要

相似文献

1
Infant VEP acuity measurements: analysis of individual differences and measurement error.
Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1985 Nov;61(5):359-69. doi: 10.1016/0013-4694(85)91026-0.
2
Stimulus duration, neural adaptation, and sweep visual evoked potential acuity estimates.刺激持续时间、神经适应与扫描视觉诱发电位敏锐度估计
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1998 Dec;39(13):2759-68.
3
Spatial frequency sweep VEP: visual acuity during the first year of life.空间频率扫描视觉诱发电位:生命第一年的视力
Vision Res. 1985;25(10):1399-408. doi: 10.1016/0042-6989(85)90217-2.
4
The effects of luminance on FPL and VEP acuity in human infants.
Vision Res. 1992 Nov;32(11):2005-12. doi: 10.1016/0042-6989(92)90061-m.
5
Comparison of pattern VEPs and preferential-looking behavior in 3-month-old infants.3个月大婴儿的图形视觉诱发电位与优先注视行为的比较。
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1985 Mar;26(3):359-65.
6
Infant grating acuity is temporally tuned.
Vision Res. 1988;28(12):1357-66. doi: 10.1016/0042-6989(88)90067-3.
7
VEP estimation of visual acuity: a systematic review.视诱发电位法估计视力:系统评价。
Doc Ophthalmol. 2021 Feb;142(1):25-74. doi: 10.1007/s10633-020-09770-3. Epub 2020 Jun 2.
8
Test-retest reliability of swept visual evoked potential measurements of infant visual acuity and contrast sensitivity.婴儿视力和对比敏感度的扫频视觉诱发电位测量的重测信度。
Pediatr Res. 2004 Apr;55(4):701-8. doi: 10.1203/01.PDR.0000113769.44799.02. Epub 2004 Jan 22.
9
Infant VEP and preferential looking acuity measured with phase alternating gratings.使用相位交替光栅测量婴儿视觉诱发电位和优先注视视力。
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1992 Oct;33(11):3156-61.
10
Objective assessment of visual acuity: a refined model for analyzing the sweep VEP.视力的客观评估:一种用于分析扫描视觉诱发电位的改进模型。
Doc Ophthalmol. 2019 Apr;138(2):97-116. doi: 10.1007/s10633-019-09672-z. Epub 2019 Jan 29.

引用本文的文献

1
SSVEP-based visual acuity threshold estimation: linear extrapolation to noise level baseline with various noise definition criteria.基于稳态视觉诱发电位的视力阈值估计:采用各种噪声定义标准对噪声水平基线进行线性外推
Cogn Neurodyn. 2024 Aug;18(4):1641-1650. doi: 10.1007/s11571-023-10036-2. Epub 2023 Dec 1.
2
An edge-simplicity bias in the visual input to young infants.婴儿早期视觉输入的边缘简单性偏见。
Sci Adv. 2024 May 10;10(19):eadj8571. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.adj8571.
3
Audiovisual interaction with rate-varying signals.与变速信号的视听交互。
Iperception. 2022 Nov 28;13(6):20416695221116653. doi: 10.1177/20416695221116653. eCollection 2022 Nov-Dec.
4
The power of rhythms: how steady-state evoked responses reveal early neurocognitive development.节奏的力量:稳态诱发反应如何揭示早期神经认知发育。
Neuroimage. 2022 Jul 1;254:119150. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2022.119150. Epub 2022 Mar 26.
5
Enhancing Performance of SSVEP-Based Visual Acuity via Spatial Filtering.通过空间滤波提高基于稳态视觉诱发电位的视力
Front Neurosci. 2021 Aug 19;15:716051. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2021.716051. eCollection 2021.
6
Assessment of Human Visual Acuity Using Visual Evoked Potential: A Review.使用视觉诱发电位评估人类视力:综述。
Sensors (Basel). 2020 Sep 28;20(19):5542. doi: 10.3390/s20195542.
7
Anti-fatigue Performance in SSVEP-Based Visual Acuity Assessment: A Comparison of Six Stimulus Paradigms.基于稳态视觉诱发电位的视力评估中的抗疲劳性能:六种刺激范式的比较
Front Hum Neurosci. 2020 Jul 31;14:301. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2020.00301. eCollection 2020.
8
VEP estimation of visual acuity: a systematic review.视诱发电位法估计视力:系统评价。
Doc Ophthalmol. 2021 Feb;142(1):25-74. doi: 10.1007/s10633-020-09770-3. Epub 2020 Jun 2.
9
A comparison of contrast sensitivity and sweep visual evoked potential (sVEP) acuity estimates in normal humans.正常人类中对比敏感度与扫描视觉诱发电位(sVEP)视力估计值的比较。
Doc Ophthalmol. 2019 Dec;139(3):207-219. doi: 10.1007/s10633-019-09712-8. Epub 2019 Aug 14.
10
Similarities and differences between behavioral and electrophysiological visual acuity thresholds in healthy infants during the second half of the first year of life.出生后第一年下半年健康婴儿行为视力阈值与电生理视力阈值之间的异同。
Doc Ophthalmol. 2017 Apr;134(2):99-110. doi: 10.1007/s10633-017-9576-z. Epub 2017 Feb 20.