• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

采用意向性手势治疗命名障碍后话语跟随的延迟刺激特异性改善。

Delayed Stimulus-Specific Improvements in Discourse Following Anomia Treatment Using an Intentional Gesture.

机构信息

University of Florida, Gainesville

出版信息

J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2014 Apr 1;57(2):439-54. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2013/12-0224).

DOI:10.1044/1092-4388(2013/12-0224)
PMID:24129014
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4157115/
Abstract

Purpose: In this study, the authors assessed how the addition of intentional left-hand gestures to an intensive treatment for anomia affects 2 types of discourse: picture description and responses to open-ended questions.Method: Fourteen people with aphasia completed treatment for anomia comprising 30 treatment sessions over 3 weeks.Seven subjects also incorporated intentional left-hand gestures into each treatment trial.Results: Both groups demonstrated significant changes in trained items and improved naming of untrained items but no change in Western Aphasia Battery—Aphasia Quotient(WAB–AQ; Kertesz, 1982) scores. Changes in discourse were limited to the 3-month follow-up assessment. Several discourse measures showed significant improvements in the picture description task and declines during question responses. Additionally, the gesture group produced more words at each assessment, whereas the no gesture group produced fewer words at each assessment. These patterns led to improvements in picture descriptions and minimal declines in question responses in the gesture group. In contrast, the no gesture group showed minimal improvements in picture descriptions and production declines in question responses relative to pretreatment levels.Conclusion: The intensive treatment protocol is a successful method for improving picture naming even of untrained items.Further, the authors conclude that the intentional left-hand gesture contributed significantly to the generalization of treatment to discourse.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估在针对命名障碍的强化治疗中加入有意的左手手势对 2 种语篇类型的影响:图片描述和开放式问题回答。

方法

14 名失语症患者完成了为期 3 周共 30 次治疗的命名障碍治疗。其中 7 名患者在每次治疗试验中还加入了有意的左手手势。

结果

两组在训练项目上均显示出显著的变化,对未训练项目的命名能力也有所提高,但西方失语症成套测验-失语症严重程度指数(WAB-AQ;Kertesz,1982)评分没有变化。语篇变化仅限于 3 个月的随访评估。一些语篇测量指标在图片描述任务中显示出显著的改善,而在问题回答中则出现下降。此外,手势组在每次评估中产生的单词更多,而无手势组在每次评估中产生的单词更少。这些模式导致手势组的图片描述有所改善,而问题回答的下降幅度最小。相比之下,无手势组在图片描述方面的改善较小,而在问题回答方面的产出下降与治疗前水平相当。

结论

强化治疗方案是一种成功的方法,即使对于未训练的项目也能提高图片命名能力。此外,作者得出结论,有意的左手手势对手语治疗的泛化起到了重要作用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/604a/4157115/78033a6003b1/nihms529101f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/604a/4157115/78033a6003b1/nihms529101f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/604a/4157115/78033a6003b1/nihms529101f1.jpg

相似文献

1
Delayed Stimulus-Specific Improvements in Discourse Following Anomia Treatment Using an Intentional Gesture.采用意向性手势治疗命名障碍后话语跟随的延迟刺激特异性改善。
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2014 Apr 1;57(2):439-54. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2013/12-0224).
2
Contrasting effects of errorless naming treatment and gestural facilitation for word retrieval in aphasia.错误命名治疗和手势促进对失语症患者单词检索的对比影响。
Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2012;22(2):235-66. doi: 10.1080/09602011.2011.618306. Epub 2011 Nov 3.
3
A comparison of intention and pantomime gesture treatment for noun retrieval in people with aphasia.意图治疗和手势模仿治疗对失语症患者名词检索的比较。
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2012 May;21(2):S126-39. doi: 10.1044/1058-0360(2012/11-0076). Epub 2012 Jan 31.
4
Enhancement of naming in nonfluent aphasia through gesture.
Brain Lang. 1990 Feb;38(2):298-314. doi: 10.1016/0093-934x(90)90116-x.
5
Gesture's Role in the Communication of Adults With Different Types of Aphasia.手势在不同类型失语症成人交流中的作用。
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2024 Jul 3;33(4):1811-1830. doi: 10.1044/2024_AJSLP-23-00046. Epub 2024 Apr 16.
6
Using semantic feature analysis to improve contextual discourse in adults with aphasia.运用语义特征分析改善失语症成人的语境话语。
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2008 May;17(2):161-72. doi: 10.1044/1058-0360(2008/016).
7
Gesture and naming therapy for people with severe aphasia: a group study.手势和命名疗法治疗严重失语症患者:一项群组研究。
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2012 Jun;55(3):726-38. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2011/11-0219). Epub 2012 Jan 31.
8
Therapy for naming difficulties in bilingual aphasia: which language benefits?双语失语症命名困难的治疗:哪种语言受益?
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2011 Jan-Feb;46(1):48-62. doi: 10.3109/13682822.2010.484845. Epub 2010 Jul 26.
9
Mechanisms underlying anomia treatment outcomes.命名障碍治疗效果的作用机制。
J Commun Disord. 2020 Nov-Dec;88:106048. doi: 10.1016/j.jcomdis.2020.106048. Epub 2020 Sep 29.
10
The relationship of aphasia type and gesture production in people with aphasia.失语症类型与失语症患者手势生成的关系。
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2013 Nov;22(4):662-72. doi: 10.1044/1058-0360(2013/12-0030). Epub 2013 Sep 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Aphasia rehabilitation: a narrative review of adjuvant techniques.失语症康复:辅助技术的叙述性综述
Front Hum Neurosci. 2025 Jul 30;19:1554147. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2025.1554147. eCollection 2025.
2
Bayesian longitudinal tensor response regression for modeling neuroplasticity.贝叶斯纵向张量响应回归模型用于神经可塑性研究。
Hum Brain Mapp. 2023 Dec 15;44(18):6326-6348. doi: 10.1002/hbm.26509. Epub 2023 Nov 1.
3
Analyzing Language in the Picnic Scene Picture and in Conversation: The Type of Discourse Sample We Choose Influences Findings in People With Aphasia.

本文引用的文献

1
Issues in phonological awareness assessment.语音意识评估中的问题。
Ann Dyslexia. 1992 Dec;42(1):242-59. doi: 10.1007/BF02654948.
2
Generalized event knowledge activation during online sentence comprehension.在线句子理解过程中的广义事件知识激活
J Mem Lang. 2012 May 1;66(4):545-567. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2012.01.001.
3
Event-based plausibility immediately influences on-line language comprehension.基于事件的合理性会立即影响在线语言理解。
分析野餐场景图片和对话中的语言:我们选择的话语样本类型会影响失语症患者的研究结果。
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2023 Jul 10;32(4):1413-1430. doi: 10.1044/2023_AJSLP-22-00279. Epub 2023 May 31.
4
Assessing Language in Unstructured Conversation in People With Aphasia: Methods, Psychometric Integrity, Normative Data, and Comparison to a Structured Narrative Task.评估失语症患者非结构化对话中的语言:方法、心理计量学完整性、常模数据以及与结构化叙事任务的比较。
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2021 Nov 8;64(11):4344-4365. doi: 10.1044/2021_JSLHR-20-00641. Epub 2021 Oct 7.
5
Transcranial Direct-Current Stimulation May Improve Discourse Production in Healthy Older Adults.经颅直流电刺激可能改善健康老年人的话语表达能力。
Front Neurol. 2020 Aug 26;11:935. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2020.00935. eCollection 2020.
6
Attentional prioritization in dual-task walking: Effects of stroke, environment, and instructed focus.注意分配在双重任务步行中的作用:卒中、环境和指令焦点的影响。
Gait Posture. 2020 Jun;79:3-9. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2020.03.013. Epub 2020 Apr 9.
7
Neuroplasticity and aphasia treatments: new approaches for an old problem.神经可塑性与失语症治疗:老问题的新方法。
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2019 Oct;90(10):1147-1155. doi: 10.1136/jnnp-2018-319649. Epub 2019 May 4.
8
Effects of Phonomotor Treatment on discourse production.语音运动治疗对言语产出的影响。
Aphasiology. 2019;33(2):125-139. doi: 10.1080/02687038.2018.1512080. Epub 2018 Sep 4.
9
Advances in neurocognitive rehabilitation research from 1992 to 2017: The ascension of neural plasticity.1992年至2017年神经认知康复研究进展:神经可塑性的兴起
Neuropsychology. 2017 Nov;31(8):900-920. doi: 10.1037/neu0000396. Epub 2017 Aug 31.
10
Speech and language therapy for aphasia following stroke.中风后失语症的言语和语言治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Jun 1;2016(6):CD000425. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000425.pub4.
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2011 Jul;37(4):913-34. doi: 10.1037/a0022964.
4
Effect of verb network strengthening treatment in moderate-to-severe aphasia.动词网络强化治疗对中度至重度失语症的影响。
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2011 May;20(2):131-45. doi: 10.1044/1058-0360(2011/10-0036). Epub 2011 Mar 8.
5
Dual-task effects of spontaneous speech and executive function on gait in aging: exaggerated effects in slow walkers.自发言语和执行功能对衰老步态的双重任务影响:在慢行者中影响更为明显。
Gait Posture. 2011 Feb;33(2):233-7. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2010.11.011. Epub 2010 Dec 28.
6
Effects of event knowledge in processing verbal arguments.事件知识在处理言语论证中的作用。
J Mem Lang. 2010 Nov 1;63(4):489-505. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2010.08.004.
7
TRAINING VERB PRODUCTION IN COMMUNICATIVE CONTEXT: EVIDENCE FROM A PERSON WITH CHRONIC NON-FLUENT APHASIA.在交际语境中训练动词产出:来自一名慢性非流畅性失语症患者的证据。
Aphasiology. 2009 Dec 12;23(12):1383-1397. doi: 10.1080/02687030802235203.
8
Regional changes in word-production laterality after a naming treatment designed to produce a rightward shift in frontal activity.一种旨在使额叶活动向右偏移的命名治疗后,词汇生成偏侧性的区域变化。
Brain Lang. 2009 Nov;111(2):73-85. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2009.08.001. Epub 2009 Oct 6.
9
Effect of Verb Network Strengthening Treatment (VNeST) on Lexical Retrieval of Content Words in Sentences in Persons with Aphasia.动词网络强化治疗(VNeST)对失语症患者句子中实词词汇检索的影响。
Aphasiology. 2009 Mar 1;23(3):402-424. doi: 10.1080/02687030802291339.
10
A linguistic communication measure for monitoring changes in Chinese aphasic narrative production.
Clin Linguist Phon. 2009 Apr;23(4):255-69. doi: 10.1080/02699200802673234.