• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

实施预防糖尿病教育课程的权力:一项可行性研究。

Implementation of the power to prevent diabetes prevention educational curriculum into rural African American communities: a feasibility study.

机构信息

University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, North Carolina (Dr Cene, Ms Haymore, Dr Lin, Dr Corbie-Smith)

Together Transforming Lives, Inc, Enfield, North Carolina (Dr Ellis, Ms Whitaker)

出版信息

Diabetes Educ. 2013 Nov-Dec;39(6):776-85. doi: 10.1177/0145721713507114. Epub 2013 Oct 15.

DOI:10.1177/0145721713507114
PMID:24129595
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4429528/
Abstract

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to describe the feasibility of using a community-based participatory research (CBPR) approach to implement the Power to Prevent (P2P) diabetes prevention education curriculum in rural African American (AA) settings.

METHODS

Trained community health workers facilitated the 12-session P2P curriculum across 3 community settings. Quantitative (based on the pre- and post-curriculum questionnaires and changes in blood glucose, blood pressure [BP], and weight at baseline and 6 months) and qualitative data (based on semi-structured interviews with facilitators) were collected. Indicators of feasibility included: demand, acceptability, implementation fidelity, and limited efficacy testing.

RESULTS

Across 3 counties, 104 AA participants were recruited; 43% completed ≥ 75% of the sessions. There was great demand for the program. Fifteen community health ambassadors (CHAs) were trained, and 4 served as curriculum facilitators. Content and structure of the intervention was acceptable to facilitators but there were challenges to implementing the program as designed. Improvements were seen in diabetes knowledge and the impact of healthy eating and physical activity on diabetes prevention, but there were no significant changes in blood glucose, BP, or weight.

CONCLUSION

While it is feasible to use a CBPR approach to recruit participants and implement the P2P curriculum in AA community settings, there are significant challenges that must be overcome.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在描述在农村非裔美国人(AA)环境中使用基于社区的参与式研究(CBPR)方法实施预防糖尿病的 Power to Prevent(P2P)教育课程的可行性。

方法

经过培训的社区卫生工作者在 3 个社区环境中促进了 12 节 P2P 课程。收集了定量数据(基于课程前后的问卷以及基线和 6 个月时血糖、血压和体重的变化)和定性数据(基于对促进者的半结构化访谈)。可行性指标包括:需求、可接受性、实施保真度和有限的功效测试。

结果

在 3 个县共招募了 104 名 AA 参与者;43%的人完成了≥75%的课程。该项目需求很大。培训了 15 名社区卫生大使(CHAs),其中 4 人担任课程促进者。干预措施的内容和结构得到了促进者的认可,但在按照设计实施该方案时存在挑战。在糖尿病知识以及健康饮食和体育活动对预防糖尿病的影响方面有了明显的改善,但血糖、血压或体重没有显著变化。

结论

虽然在 AA 社区环境中使用 CBPR 方法招募参与者和实施 P2P 课程是可行的,但仍存在必须克服的重大挑战。

相似文献

1
Implementation of the power to prevent diabetes prevention educational curriculum into rural African American communities: a feasibility study.实施预防糖尿病教育课程的权力:一项可行性研究。
Diabetes Educ. 2013 Nov-Dec;39(6):776-85. doi: 10.1177/0145721713507114. Epub 2013 Oct 15.
2
Evaluation of a community health worker pilot intervention to improve diabetes management in Bangladeshi immigrants with type 2 diabetes in New York City.评估社区卫生工作者试点干预措施对改善纽约市患有2型糖尿病的孟加拉移民糖尿病管理的效果。
Diabetes Educ. 2013 Jul-Aug;39(4):478-93. doi: 10.1177/0145721713491438. Epub 2013 Jun 7.
3
Community-based participatory research to design a faith-enhanced diabetes prevention program: The Better Me Within randomized trial.基于社区的参与式研究以设计一个增强信仰的糖尿病预防项目:“内在更美好的我”随机试验
Contemp Clin Trials. 2017 Nov;62:77-90. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2017.08.003. Epub 2017 Aug 12.
4
EMPOWER: a randomized trial using community health workers to deliver a lifestyle intervention program in African American women with Type 2 diabetes: design, rationale, and baseline characteristics.EMPOWER:一项利用社区卫生工作者为 2 型糖尿病非裔美国女性提供生活方式干预计划的随机试验:设计、原理和基线特征。
Contemp Clin Trials. 2013 Sep;36(1):147-53. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2013.06.006. Epub 2013 Jun 19.
5
The WORD (Wholeness, Oneness, Righteousness, Deliverance): design of a randomized controlled trial testing the effectiveness of an evidence-based weight loss and maintenance intervention translated for a faith-based, rural, African American population using a community-based participatory approach.“圣言”(整体性、合一性、正义性、救赎):一项随机对照试验的设计,该试验采用基于社区的参与性方法,对一种基于循证的体重减轻及维持干预措施针对农村非裔美国信众群体进行有效性测试。
Contemp Clin Trials. 2015 Jan;40:63-73. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2014.11.009. Epub 2014 Nov 15.
6
A randomized pilot study of a community-based weight loss intervention for African-American women: Rationale and study design of Doing Me! Sisters Standing Together for a Healthy Mind and Body.一项针对非裔美国女性的基于社区的体重减轻干预措施的随机试点研究:“成就自我!姐妹们携手追求身心健康”的原理与研究设计。
Contemp Clin Trials. 2015 Jul;43:200-8. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2015.06.006. Epub 2015 Jun 12.
7
The effects of a community-based, culturally tailored diabetes prevention intervention for high-risk adults of Mexican descent.一项针对墨西哥裔高危成年人的、基于社区且量身定制的糖尿病预防干预措施的效果。
Diabetes Educ. 2014 Mar-Apr;40(2):202-13. doi: 10.1177/0145721714521020. Epub 2014 Feb 7.
8
Health, community, and spirituality: evaluation of a multicultural faith-based diabetes prevention program.健康、社区与灵性:一项基于多元文化信仰的糖尿病预防项目评估
Diabetes Educ. 2014 Mar-Apr;40(2):214-22. doi: 10.1177/0145721714521872. Epub 2014 Feb 11.
9
Implementation of the fit body and soul, a church-based life style program for diabetes prevention in high-risk African Americans: a feasibility study.实施身心健康计划,以基于教堂的生活方式预防高危非裔美国人的糖尿病:一项可行性研究。
Diabetes Educ. 2010 May-Jun;36(3):465-72. doi: 10.1177/0145721710366756.
10
TEEN HEED: Design of a clinical-community youth diabetes prevention intervention.青少年关注:一项临床-社区青少年糖尿病预防干预措施的设计
Contemp Clin Trials. 2017 Jun;57:23-28. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2017.03.010. Epub 2017 Mar 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Implementation of diabetes prevention programs into clinical practice and community settings: a systematic search and review.将糖尿病预防项目纳入临床实践和社区环境:系统检索与综述
Implement Sci Commun. 2025 Jul 9;6(1):74. doi: 10.1186/s43058-025-00757-2.
2
Feasibility of a Pharmabuddy Care Service for patients with Parkinson's disease.帕金森病患者药物伙伴关怀服务的可行性
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Dec 18;24(1):1560. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-12057-x.
3
Mentored implementation to initiate a diabetes program in an underserved community: a pilot study.导师指导实施计划在服务不足社区启动糖尿病项目:一项试点研究。
BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care. 2021 Aug;9(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjdrc-2021-002320.
4
It Is Not Just About Enrollment: Recognizing the Impact of RCT Recruitment Approaches on Prediabetes Awareness, Screening, and Capacity Building in African American Communities.这不仅仅关乎招募:认识随机对照试验招募方法对非裔美国人社区糖尿病前期认知、筛查及能力建设的影响。
J Urban Health. 2021 Oct;98(Suppl 2):123-128. doi: 10.1007/s11524-021-00543-0. Epub 2021 Jun 17.
5
Revising Diabetes Programming for Black Men and Their Families.为黑人男性及其家庭修订糖尿病防治计划。
Glob Qual Nurs Res. 2020 Sep 30;7:2333393620960183. doi: 10.1177/2333393620960183. eCollection 2020 Jan-Dec.
6
Burden and management of type 2 diabetes in rural United States.美国农村 2 型糖尿病的负担和管理。
Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2021 Jul;37(5):e3410. doi: 10.1002/dmrr.3410. Epub 2020 Oct 5.
7
Educational content and challenges encountered when training service user representatives as peer researchers in a mixed study on patient experience of hospital safety.在一项关于患者医院安全体验的混合研究中,将服务使用者代表培训为同行研究者时遇到的教育内容和挑战。
Res Involv Engagem. 2020 Sep 1;6:50. doi: 10.1186/s40900-020-00226-1. eCollection 2020.
8
Community-engaged and community-based participatory research to promote American Heart Association Life's Simple 7 among African American adults: A systematic review.社区参与和社区为基础的参与式研究,以促进美国心脏协会的“生命简单 7”在非裔美国成年人中的应用:系统评价。
PLoS One. 2020 Sep 1;15(9):e0238374. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0238374. eCollection 2020.
9
Implementation of Physical Activity Interventions in Rural, Remote, and Northern Communities: A Scoping Review.农村、偏远和北方社区体力活动干预措施的实施:范围综述。
Inquiry. 2020 Jan-Dec;57:46958020935662. doi: 10.1177/0046958020935662.
10
Evaluation of a Digital Diabetes Prevention Program Adapted for Low-Income Patients, 2016-2018.2016-2018 年,为低收入患者量身定制的数字化糖尿病预防计划评估。
Prev Chronic Dis. 2019 Nov 27;16:E155. doi: 10.5888/pcd16.190156.

本文引用的文献

1
Feasibility of an evidence-based weight loss intervention for a faith-based, rural, African American population.基于证据的减肥干预措施在基于信仰的农村非裔美国人中的可行性。
Prev Chronic Dis. 2011 Nov;8(6):A146. Epub 2011 Oct 17.
2
Addressing obesity and diabetes among African American men: examination of a community-based model of prevention.解决非裔美国男性的肥胖和糖尿病问题:社区预防模式的检验。
J Natl Med Assoc. 2010 Sep;102(9):794-802. doi: 10.1016/s0027-9684(15)30676-3.
3
Implementation of the fit body and soul, a church-based life style program for diabetes prevention in high-risk African Americans: a feasibility study.实施身心健康计划,以基于教堂的生活方式预防高危非裔美国人的糖尿病:一项可行性研究。
Diabetes Educ. 2010 May-Jun;36(3):465-72. doi: 10.1177/0145721710366756.
4
How we design feasibility studies.我们如何设计可行性研究。
Am J Prev Med. 2009 May;36(5):452-7. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2009.02.002.
5
Translating the Diabetes Prevention Program into practice: a review of community interventions.将糖尿病预防计划付诸实践:社区干预措施综述
Diabetes Educ. 2009 Mar-Apr;35(2):309-20. doi: 10.1177/0145721708330153.
6
Diabetes prevention in a faith-based setting: results of translational research.基于宗教信仰环境下的糖尿病预防:转化研究结果
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2008 Jan-Feb;14(1):29-32. doi: 10.1097/01.PHH.0000303410.66485.91.
7
Diabetes Risk Calculator: a simple tool for detecting undiagnosed diabetes and pre-diabetes.糖尿病风险计算器:一种用于检测未确诊糖尿病和糖尿病前期的简单工具。
Diabetes Care. 2008 May;31(5):1040-5. doi: 10.2337/dc07-1150. Epub 2007 Dec 10.
8
Facilitating behavior change with low-literacy patient education materials.利用低识字率患者教育材料促进行为改变。
Am J Health Behav. 2007 Sep-Oct;31 Suppl 1(0 1):S69-78. doi: 10.5555/ajhb.2007.31.supp.S69.
9
Diabetes health disparities: a systematic review of health care interventions.糖尿病健康差异:医疗保健干预措施的系统评价
Med Care Res Rev. 2007 Oct;64(5 Suppl):101S-56S. doi: 10.1177/1077558707305409.
10
Church-based health promotion interventions: evidence and lessons learned.基于教会的健康促进干预措施:证据与经验教训。
Annu Rev Public Health. 2007;28:213-34. doi: 10.1146/annurev.publhealth.28.021406.144016.