Suppr超能文献

丘脑前核、背内侧核和束旁核在工具性条件反射中的作用。

The role of the anterior, mediodorsal, and parafascicular thalamus in instrumental conditioning.

作者信息

Bradfield Laura A, Hart Genevra, Balleine Bernard W

机构信息

Behavioral Neuroscience Laboratory, Brain and Mind Research Institute, University of Sydney Sydney, NSW, Australia.

出版信息

Front Syst Neurosci. 2013 Oct 9;7:51. doi: 10.3389/fnsys.2013.00051.

Abstract

The traditional animal model of instrumental behavior has focused almost exclusively on structures within the cortico-striatal network and ignored the contributions of various thalamic nuclei despite large and specific connections with each of these structures. One possible reason for this is that the thalamus has been conventionally viewed as a mediator of general processes, such as attention, arousal and movement, that are not easily separated from more cognitive aspects of instrumental behavior. Recent research has, however, begun to separate these roles. Here we review the role of three thalamic nuclei in instrumental conditioning: the anterior thalamic nuclei (ANT), the mediodorsal (MD), and parafascicular thalamic nuclei (PF). Early research suggested that ANT might regulate aspects of instrumental behavior but, on review, we suggest that the types of tasks used in these studies were more likely to recruit Pavlovian processes. Indeed lesions of ANT have been found to have no effect on performance in instrumental free-operant tasks. By contrast the mediodorsal thalamus (MD) has been found to play a specific and important role in the acquisition of goal-directed action. We propose this role is related to its connections with prelimbic cortex (PL) and present new data that directly implicates this circuit in the acquisition of goal-directed actions. Finally we review evidence suggesting the PF, although not critical for the acquisition or performance of instrumental actions, plays a specific role in regulating action flexibility.

摘要

传统的工具性学习行为动物模型几乎完全聚焦于皮质-纹状体网络中的结构,尽管丘脑的各个核团与这些结构都有着广泛且特定的联系,但却忽略了它们的作用。造成这种情况的一个可能原因是,丘脑传统上被视为诸如注意力、觉醒和运动等一般过程的调节者,而这些过程与工具性学习行为中更具认知性的方面不易区分。然而,最近的研究已开始区分这些作用。在此,我们综述了三个丘脑核团在工具性条件反射中的作用:前丘脑核(ANT)、背内侧核(MD)和束旁丘脑核(PF)。早期研究表明,ANT可能调节工具性学习行为的某些方面,但经重新审视,我们认为这些研究中所使用的任务类型更有可能涉及巴甫洛夫式过程。事实上,已发现损毁ANT对工具性自由操作任务的表现并无影响。相比之下,已发现背内侧丘脑(MD)在目标导向行为的习得中发挥着特定且重要的作用。我们认为这一作用与其与前边缘皮层(PL)的连接有关,并呈现了直接表明该神经回路在目标导向行为习得中的作用的新数据。最后,我们综述了相关证据,这些证据表明PF虽然对工具性学习行为的习得或执行并非至关重要,但在调节行为灵活性方面发挥着特定作用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/66be/3793176/ebec40afa7fa/fnsys-07-00051-g0001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验