Carre Emilie, Ogier Michael, Boret Henry, Montcriol Ambroise, Bourdon Lionel, Jean-Jacques Risso
Unit of Traumatology, Institut de Recherche Biomedicale des Armees , Bretigny , France.
Front Neurol. 2013 Oct 11;4:146. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2013.00146.
Ischemia and metabolic crisis are frequent post-traumatic secondary brain insults that negatively influence outcome. Clinicians commonly mix up these two types of insults, mainly because high lactate/pyruvate ratio (LPR) is the common marker for both ischemia and metabolic crisis. However, LPR elevations during ischemia and metabolic crisis reflect two different energetic imbalances: ischemia (Type 1 LPR elevations with low oxygenation) is characterized by a drastic deprivation of energetic substrates, whereas metabolic crisis (Type 2 LPR elevations with normal or high oxygenation) is associated with profound mitochondrial dysfunction but normal supply of energetic substrates. The discrimination between ischemia and metabolic crisis is crucial because conventional recommendations against ischemia may be detrimental for patients with metabolic crisis. Multimodal monitoring, including microdialysis and brain tissue oxygen monitoring, allows such discrimination, but these techniques are not easily accessible to all head-injured patients. Thus, a new "gold standard" and adapted medical education are required to optimize the management of patients with metabolic crisis.
缺血和代谢危机是常见的创伤后脑继发性损伤,会对预后产生负面影响。临床医生常常将这两种类型的损伤混为一谈,主要是因为高乳酸/丙酮酸比值(LPR)是缺血和代谢危机的共同标志物。然而,缺血和代谢危机期间LPR升高反映了两种不同的能量失衡:缺血(低氧情况下的1型LPR升高)的特征是能量底物急剧缺乏,而代谢危机(正常或高氧情况下的2型LPR升高)与严重的线粒体功能障碍相关,但能量底物供应正常。区分缺血和代谢危机至关重要,因为针对缺血的传统建议可能对代谢危机患者有害。包括微透析和脑组织氧监测在内的多模态监测能够实现这种区分,但并非所有颅脑损伤患者都能轻易使用这些技术。因此,需要一种新的“金标准”和适应性医学教育来优化代谢危机患者的管理。