Souza Pamela, Gehani Namita, Wright Richard, McCloy Daniel
Roxelyn and Richard Pepper Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL.
J Am Acad Audiol. 2013 Sep;24(8):689-700. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.24.8.6.
Many audiologists have observed a situation where a patient appears to understand something spoken by his or her spouse or a close friend but not the same information spoken by a stranger. However, it is not clear whether this observation reflects choice of communication strategy or a true benefit derived from the talker's voice.
The current study measured the benefits of long-term talker familiarity for older individuals with hearing impairment in a variety of listening situations.
In Experiment 1, we measured speech recognition with familiar and unfamiliar voices when the difficulty level was manipulated by varying levels of a speech-shaped background noise. In Experiment 2, we measured the benefit of a familiar voice when the background noise was other speech (informational masking).
A group of 31 older listeners with high-frequency sensorineural hearing loss participated in the study. Fifteen of the participants served as talkers and 16 as listeners. In each case, the talker-listener pair for the familiar condition represented a close, long-term relationship (spouse or close friend).
Speech-recognition scores were compared using controlled stimuli (low-context sentences) recorded by the study talkers. The sentences were presented in quiet and in two levels of speech-spectrum noise (Experiment 1) as well as in multitalker babble (Experiment 2). Repeated-measures analysis of variance was used to compare performance between the familiar and unfamiliar talkers, within and across conditions.
Listeners performed better when speech was produced by a talker familiar to them, whether that talker was in a quiet or noisy environment. The advantage of the familiar talker was greater in a more adverse listening situation (i.e., in the highest level of background noise) but was similar for speech-spectrum noise and multitalker babble.
The present data support a frequent clinical observation: listeners can understand their spouse better than a stranger. This effect was present for all our participants and occurred under strictly controlled conditions in which the only possible cue was the voice itself, rather than under normal communicative conditions where listener accommodation strategies on the part of the talker may confound the measurable benefit. The magnitude of the effect was larger than shown for short-term familiarity in previous work. This suggests that older listeners with hearing loss who inherently operate under deficient auditory conditions can benefit from experience with the voice characteristics of a long-term communication partner over many years of a relationship.
许多听力学家都观察到这样一种情况,即患者似乎能理解其配偶或密友所说的话,但却听不懂陌生人说的同样内容。然而,尚不清楚这种观察结果是反映了交流策略的选择,还是源自说话者声音的真正益处。
本研究测量了长期熟悉说话者对有听力障碍的老年人在各种听力情境中的益处。
在实验1中,当通过改变言语形状背景噪声的水平来操纵难度级别时,我们测量了熟悉和不熟悉声音下的言语识别能力。在实验2中,当背景噪声为其他言语(信息掩蔽)时,我们测量了熟悉声音的益处。
一组31名患有高频感音神经性听力损失的老年听众参与了该研究。其中15名参与者作为说话者,16名作为听众。在每种情况下,熟悉条件下的说话者 - 听众对代表着亲密、长期的关系(配偶或密友)。
使用研究说话者录制的受控刺激(低语境句子)比较言语识别分数。这些句子在安静环境中以及两种言语频谱噪声水平下呈现(实验1),还有在多说话者嘈杂声中呈现(实验2)。重复测量方差分析用于比较熟悉和不熟悉说话者在不同条件下以及跨条件的表现。
当言语由他们熟悉的说话者说出时,听众的表现更好,无论该说话者处于安静还是嘈杂环境中。熟悉说话者的优势在更不利的听力情境中更大(即背景噪声最高水平时),但在言语频谱噪声和多说话者嘈杂声情况下相似。
目前的数据支持一种常见的临床观察结果:听众能比陌生人更好地理解其配偶所说的话。这种效应在我们所有参与者中都存在,并且是在严格控制的条件下出现的,在这种条件下唯一可能的线索就是声音本身,而不是在正常交流条件下,即说话者的听众调节策略可能会混淆可测量的益处。这种效应的程度比先前工作中短期熟悉度所显示的更大。这表明,天生在听觉条件不足情况下操作的老年听力损失患者,能够从多年关系中与长期交流伙伴的声音特征的经验中受益。