文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

1996-2011 年极具影响力的生物医学研究人员列表。

A list of highly influential biomedical researchers, 1996-2011.

机构信息

SciTech Strategies Inc., Albuquerque, NM, 87122, USA.

出版信息

Eur J Clin Invest. 2013 Dec;43(12):1339-65. doi: 10.1111/eci.12171. Epub 2013 Oct 21.


DOI:10.1111/eci.12171
PMID:24134636
Abstract

We have generated a list of highly influential biomedical researchers based on Scopus citation data from the period 1996-2011. Of the 15,153,100 author identifiers in Scopus, approximately 1% (n=149,655) have an h-index >=20. Of those, we selected 532 authors who belonged to the 400 with highest total citation count (>=25,142 citations) and/or the 400 with highest h-index (>=76). Of those, we selected the top-400 living core biomedical researchers based on a normalized score combining total citations and h-index. Another 62 authors whose focus is outside biomedicine had a normalized score that was at least as high as the score of the 400th core biomedical researcher. We provide information on the profile of these most influential authors, including the most common Medical Subject Heading terms in their articles that are also specific to their work, most common journals where they publish, number of papers with over 100 citations that they have published as first/single, last, or middle authors, and impact score adjusted for authorship positions, given that crude citation indices and authorship positions are almost totally orthogonal. We also show for each researcher the distribution of their papers across 4 main levels (basic-to-applied) of research. We discuss technical issues, limitations and caveats, comparisons against other lists of highly-cited researchers, and potential uses of this resource.

摘要

我们根据 Scopus 1996-2011 年的引文数据生成了一份高影响力生物医学研究人员名单。在 Scopus 的 15153100 个作者标识符中,约有 1%(n=149655)的 h-index>=20。在这些人中,我们选择了 532 位作者,他们属于总引用数最高的 400 位(>=25142 次引用)和/或 h-index 最高的 400 位(>=76)。在这些人中,我们根据综合总引用数和 h-index 的归一化分数选择了前 400 位活跃的核心生物医学研究人员。另有 62 位作者的研究重点不在生物医学领域,但他们的归一化分数至少与第 400 位核心生物医学研究人员的分数一样高。我们提供了这些最有影响力的作者的简介信息,包括他们文章中最常见的医学主题词,这些词也与他们的工作相关,他们最常发表文章的期刊,他们作为第一/单一、最后或中间作者发表的超过 100 次引用的论文数量,以及根据作者位置调整的影响分数,因为原始引文指数和作者位置几乎完全正交。我们还为每位研究人员展示了他们的论文在 4 个主要研究层次(基础到应用)上的分布情况。我们讨论了技术问题、局限性和注意事项,以及与其他高引用研究人员名单的比较,并介绍了该资源的潜在用途。

相似文献

[1]
A list of highly influential biomedical researchers, 1996-2011.

Eur J Clin Invest. 2013-10-21

[2]
[Performance analysis of scientific researchers in biomedicine].

Rev Invest Clin. 2013

[3]
Critical assessment of progress of medical sciences in Iran and Turkey: the way developing countries with limited resources should make effective contributions to the production of science.

Arch Iran Med. 2011-11

[4]
One hundred citation classics in general surgical journals.

World J Surg. 2002-9

[5]
A comparative bibliometric analysis of the top 150 cited papers in hypospadiology (1945-2013).

J Pediatr Urol. 2015-4

[6]
Which articles and which topics in the forensic sciences are most highly cited?

Sci Justice. 2005

[7]
[Scientific publications of Costa Rica in Science Citation Index bibliometric analysis of the period 1999-2001].

Rev Biol Trop. 2002

[8]
[Impact factor and/or Hirsch index?].

Orv Hetil. 2007-5-6

[9]
Multiple Citation Indicators and Their Composite across Scientific Disciplines.

PLoS Biol. 2016-7-1

[10]
A bibliometric analysis of pediatric liver transplantation publications.

Pediatr Transplant. 2017-6

引用本文的文献

[1]
Counting publications and citations is not just irrelevant: it is an incentive that subverts the impact of clinical research.

Br J Sports Med. 2021-6

[2]
Misrepresentation and distortion of research in biomedical literature.

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018-3-13

[3]
Dynamics of co-authorship and productivity across different fields of scientific research.

PLoS One. 2018-1-10

[4]
Mapping of global scientific research in comorbidity and multimorbidity: A cross-sectional analysis.

PLoS One. 2018-1-3

[5]
The rise of the middle author: Investigating collaboration and division of labor in biomedical research using partial alphabetical authorship.

PLoS One. 2017-9-14

[6]
Considerations for higher efficiency and productivity in research activities.

BioData Min. 2016-11-9

[7]
Multiple Citation Indicators and Their Composite across Scientific Disciplines.

PLoS Biol. 2016-7-1

[8]
Use of positive and negative words in scientific PubMed abstracts between 1974 and 2014: retrospective analysis.

BMJ. 2015-12-14

[9]
Bibliometrics: Is your most cited work your best?

Nature. 2014-10-30

[10]
How to make more published research true.

PLoS Med. 2014-10-21

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索