如何让更多已发表的研究成果真实可靠。
How to make more published research true.
作者信息
Ioannidis John P A
机构信息
Meta-Research Innovation Center at Stanford (METRICS), Stanford University, Stanford, California, United States of America; Department of Medicine, Stanford Prevention Research Center, Stanford, California, United States of America; Department of Health Research and Policy, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, United States of America; Department of Statistics, Stanford University School of Humanities and Sciences, Stanford, California, United States of America.
出版信息
PLoS Med. 2014 Oct 21;11(10):e1001747. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001747. eCollection 2014 Oct.
Abstract
In a 2005 paper that has been accessed more than a million times, John Ioannidis explained why most published research findings were false. Here he revisits the topic, this time to address how to improve matters. Please see later in the article for the Editors' Summary.
摘要
在一篇访问量超过百万次的2005年论文中，约翰·约阿尼季斯解释了为何大多数已发表的研究结果是错误的。在此他再次探讨这一话题，此次是为了解决如何改善这种情况。编辑总结请见本文后文。
相似文献
1
How to make more published research true.如何让更多已发表的研究成果真实可靠。
PLoS Med. 2014 Oct 21;11(10):e1001747. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001747. eCollection 2014 Oct.
2
Indian editors urge medical council to rethink publication guidelines for academic promotions.印度编辑敦促医学委员会重新考虑学术晋升的出版指南。
BMJ. 2016 Jan 21;352:i344. doi: 10.1136/bmj.i344.
3
Awareness and enforcement of guidelines for publishing industry-sponsored medical research among publication professionals: the Global Publication Survey.出版行业资助的医学研究指南在出版专业人员中的知晓度与执行情况：全球出版调查
BMJ Open. 2014 Apr 19;4(4):e004780. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-004780.
4
A stronger post-publication culture is needed for better science.为了推动科学更好地发展，需要一种更强大的发表后文化。
PLoS Med. 2014 Dec 30;11(12):e1001772. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001772. eCollection 2014 Dec.
5
Key elements required to publish a good article: consensus among executive editors of Traditional Chinese Medicine and integrative medicine journals - a Delphi study.发表一篇优秀文章所需的关键要素：中医与中西医结合期刊执行编辑之间的共识——一项德尔菲研究
J Tradit Chin Med. 2015 Jun;35(3):335-42. doi: 10.1016/s0254-6272(15)30107-2.
6
Are you also overwhelmed by the predators?你也被这些食肉动物吓坏了吗？
Appl Nurs Res. 2018 Feb;39:270. doi: 10.1016/j.apnr.2017.12.015.
7
LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Dealing with predatory publishing is a shared responsibility: the role of Latin American journals.致编辑的信：应对掠夺性出版是一项共同责任：拉丁美洲期刊的作用
An Acad Bras Cienc. 2019 Nov 11;91(4):e20180631. doi: 10.1590/0001-3765201920180631.
8
Is Mandatory Prospective Trial Registration Working to Prevent Publication of Unregistered Trials and Selective Outcome Reporting? An Observational Study of Five Psychiatry Journals That Mandate Prospective Clinical Trial Registration.强制前瞻性试验注册能否防止未注册试验的发表和选择性结果报告？对五家强制要求进行前瞻性临床试验注册的精神病学杂志的观察性研究。
PLoS One. 2015 Aug 19;10(8):e0133718. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0133718. eCollection 2015.
9
[Statistical methods for detecting and adjusting for publication bias].[用于检测和校正发表偏倚的统计方法]
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2010;104(4):306-13. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2010.03.016.
10
Ethical guidelines to publication of chemical research.化学研究成果发表的伦理准则。
Acc Chem Res. 2002 Jan;35(1):74-6.
引用本文的文献
1
Disparity between statistical significance and clinical importance in published randomised controlled trials: a methodological study.已发表的随机对照试验中统计学显著性与临床重要性之间的差异：一项方法学研究。
BMJ Open. 2025 Aug 25;15(8):e100411. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2025-100411.
2
Advancing research translation in addiction and pain: A portfolio analysis of the NIH HEAL initiative.推进成瘾与疼痛领域的研究转化：美国国立卫生研究院健康促进、教育及长期支持倡议（HEAL）的项目组合分析
J Clin Transl Sci. 2025 Apr 14;9(1):e92. doi: 10.1017/cts.2025.68. eCollection 2025.
3
Explanation & Elaboration document of the COSMIN Reporting Guideline 2.0 for studies on measurement properties of patient-reported outcome measures.患者报告结局指标测量属性研究的COSMIN报告指南2.0解释与阐述文件
Qual Life Res. 2025 Apr 17. doi: 10.1007/s11136-025-03949-4.
4
Why is it important to implement meta-research in universities and institutes with medical research activities?为什么在开展医学研究活动的大学和机构中实施元研究很重要？
Front Res Metr Anal. 2025 Mar 19;10:1497280. doi: 10.3389/frma.2025.1497280. eCollection 2025.
5
Functional vs Structural Cortical Deficit Pattern Biomarkers for Major Depressive Disorder.重度抑郁症的功能性与结构性皮质缺陷模式生物标志物
JAMA Psychiatry. 2025 Apr 2. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2025.0192.
6
The importance of rigor in pharmacy research: Challenges and solutions.药学研究中严谨性的重要性：挑战与解决方案。
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2025 May;21(5):424-430. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2025.02.005. Epub 2025 Feb 7.
7
Protocol publication rate and comparison between article, registry and protocol in RCTs.随机对照试验中方案的发表率以及文章、注册信息与方案之间的比较。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2025 Feb 1;25(1):31. doi: 10.1186/s12874-025-02471-y.
8
Balancing precision and affordability in assessing infant development in large-scale mortality trials: secondary analysis of a randomised controlled trial.在大规模死亡率试验中评估婴儿发育时平衡精度与可承受性：一项随机对照试验的二次分析
Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2025 Jun 19;110(4):409-414. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2024-327762.
9
Effects of psychedelics on neurogenesis and broader neuroplasticity: a systematic review.迷幻剂对神经发生及更广泛神经可塑性的影响：一项系统综述
Mol Med. 2024 Dec 19;30(1):244. doi: 10.1186/s10020-024-01013-4.
10
Transparency, bias, and reproducibility across science: a meta-research view.科学中的透明度、偏差和可重复性：元研究视角。
J Clin Invest. 2024 Nov 15;134(22):e181923. doi: 10.1172/JCI181923.
本文引用的文献
1
Scientific Utopia: II. Restructuring Incentives and Practices to Promote Truth Over Publishability.《科学乌托邦：二、调整激励机制与实践以促进追求真理而非追求可发表性》
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2012 Nov;7(6):615-31. doi: 10.1177/1745691612459058.
2
Is the Replicability Crisis Overblown? Three Arguments Examined.复制危机是否被夸大了？三个论点的考察。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2012 Nov;7(6):531-6. doi: 10.1177/1745691612463401.
3
Impact of peer review on reports of randomised trials published in open peer review journals: retrospective before and after study.同行评审对开放同行评审期刊上发表的随机试验报告的影响：前后对比的回顾性研究。
BMJ. 2014 Jul 1;349:g4145. doi: 10.1136/bmj.g4145.
4
Evidence based medicine: a movement in crisis?循证医学：一场危机中的运动？
BMJ. 2014 Jun 13;348:g3725. doi: 10.1136/bmj.g3725.
5
Cancer-gene data sharing boosted.癌症基因数据共享得到加强。
Nature. 2014 Jun 12;510(7504):198. doi: 10.1038/510198a.
6
Assessing value in biomedical research: the PQRST of appraisal and reward.评估生物医学研究中的价值：评估与奖励的PQRST法
JAMA. 2014 Aug 6;312(5):483-4. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.6932.
7
Sea change in open science and data sharing: leadership by industry.开放科学与数据共享的巨变：行业引领
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2014 Jul;7(4):499-504. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.114.001166.
8
Research on peer review and biomedical publication: furthering the quest to improve the quality of reporting.同行评审与生物医学出版研究：推动提高报告质量的探索
JAMA. 2014 Mar 12;311(10):1019-20. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.1362.
9
Making prospective registration of observational research a reality.实现观察性研究的前瞻性注册。
Sci Transl Med. 2014 Feb 19;6(224):224cm1. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3007513.
10
Scientific method: statistical errors.科学方法：统计误差
Nature. 2014 Feb 13;506(7487):150-2. doi: 10.1038/506150a.
Zotero 插件