Oncology house physician model: a response to changes in pediatric resident coverage.

BACKGROUND

Given decreasing resident duty hours, subspecialty hospitalist models have emerged to help compensate for the restructured presence of residents. We sought to examine the impact of our pediatric oncology hospitalist model on the oncology unit staff.

PROCEDURE

The survey was developed after a literature review of subspecialty hospitalist models. The final surveys were designed using a 5-point Likert scale. Descriptive statistics were used to compile baseline demographic characteristics of respondents and overall responses to survey questions.

RESULTS

Respondents agreed that house physicians provide better continuity of care (96.8%), are more comfortable with the experience level of the physician (98.4%), and are better able to answer questions (92%). Respondents also agreed that house physicians serve as backup for system-related and patient-related questions and found security knowing an experienced provider was on the floor (87.5%). Responses to open-ended questions indicated that the house physician model has impacted fellow education.

CONCLUSIONS

Our oncology house physician model helps account for decreased residency duty hours. This can serve as a model for other institutions requiring subspecialty inpatient coverage, given resident work hour restrictions. Adjustments in the clinical education of hematology/oncology fellows need to be considered in the setting of competent, consistent, and experienced front-line providers.