Division of Medical Virology, Department of Pathology, Stellenbosch University Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences and National Health Laboratory Service, Cape Town, South Africa.
J Med Virol. 2014 Jan;86(1):82-7. doi: 10.1002/jmv.23811. Epub 2013 Oct 17.
Criteria that define low positive results on the COBAS® AmpliPrep/COBAS® TaqMan (CAP/CTM) HIV-1 Qual test as inconclusive have been adopted by all academic centres in South Africa that conduct infant HIV PCR, following previous investigations that showed poor specificity of these results. Retesting all inconclusive specimens has considerable cost implications. Therefore, it was attempted to characterise such inconclusive results, by comparing those that prove to be either negative or positive on follow-up testing. This retrospective, laboratory-based study found that 193 of 211 (91.5%) patients with previous inconclusive results (defined as reported positive by CAP/CTM but with cycle threshold [Ct ] values of >32 and/or fluorescence intensity [FI] values of <5) tested negative and only 18 (8.5%) tested positive using independently obtained follow-up samples after a median of 28 days. The only significant independent predictor of a later positive result was a higher FI value (3.326 vs. 0.495, P < 0.0001), whereas Ct values were not predictive independently. Specimens from patients negative on follow-up testing differed qualitatively from specimens that proved to be true positives. As the lower FI values in false-positive compared to true-positive results probably are indicative of a non-specific signal, the incorporation of stringent amplification slope criteria in the assay's test definition file may improve correct classification and thus reduce the need for repeat testing of a large number of inconclusive specimens.
南非所有进行婴儿 HIV PCR 的学术中心都采用了 COBAS® AmpliPrep/COBAS® TaqMan (CAP/CTM) HIV-1 Qual 检测中定义弱阳性结果为不确定的标准,此前的研究表明这些结果特异性较差。对所有不确定的标本进行重复检测会带来相当大的成本影响。因此,尝试通过比较那些在后续检测中证明为阴性或阳性的标本来描述这些不确定的结果。这项回顾性的基于实验室的研究发现,211 例先前不确定结果的患者中有 193 例(91.5%)检测结果为阴性(定义为 CAP/CTM 报告阳性,但循环阈值 [Ct] 值>32 和/或荧光强度 [FI] 值<5),仅 18 例(8.5%)在中位时间为 28 天后使用独立获得的后续样本检测为阳性。唯一显著的独立预测因素是后续检测阳性的 FI 值较高(3.326 与 0.495,P<0.0001),而 Ct 值则不能独立预测。在后续检测中为阴性的患者标本与证明为真正阳性的标本在质量上有所不同。由于假阳性结果中的较低 FI 值可能表明非特异性信号,因此在检测定义文件中纳入严格的扩增斜率标准可能会提高正确分类,从而减少对大量不确定标本进行重复检测的需要。