• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估一家私立综合医院对心脏康复计划的依从性。

Evaluating compliance to a cardiac rehabilitation program in a private general hospital.

作者信息

Mair Vanessa, Breda Ana Paula, Nunes Marcos Eduardo Boquembuzo, Matos Luciana Diniz Nagem Janot de

出版信息

Einstein (Sao Paulo). 2013 Jul-Sep;11(3):278-84. doi: 10.1590/s1679-45082013000300004.

DOI:10.1590/s1679-45082013000300004
PMID:24136752
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4878584/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Identify the primary factors that influenced the participant in our cardiovascular rehabilitation program towards missing their therapy sessions, and to correlate those factors with age, cardiovascular risk, and motivation of our population.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective study with 42 patients (69.15±13.93 years) participating in the cardiac rehabilitation program at a general hospital in São Paulo, through the analysis of two scales applied during the initial evaluation: Cardiac Rehabilitation Barriers Scale and scale of the original provision. We used Spearman correlation to relate them to absenteeism, cardiovascular risk age and duration of cardiac rehabilitation.

RESULTS

The total score of barriers was 31±6 and the mean score of 1.47±0.31. The main barriers subscales were related to "travel/labor dispute" and "personal problems/family." The percentage of absenteeism was 8.4% in the number of sessions that could be made in the month. The faults and cancellations were positively correlated with cardiovascular risk (p=0.01; r=0.4) and negatively with scale provision of baseline (p=0.03; r=-0.35) and age (p=0.02; r=-0.35).

CONCLUSION

"Travel/labor dispute", "personal/ family problems", and low initial provision are the main factors absenteism in a cardiac rehabilitation program in a general hospital in São Paulo.

摘要

目的

确定影响参与我们心血管康复计划的参与者错过治疗课程的主要因素,并将这些因素与我们研究对象的年龄、心血管风险和积极性相关联。

方法

我们对圣保罗一家综合医院参与心脏康复计划的42名患者(69.15±13.93岁)进行了一项回顾性研究,通过分析初始评估期间应用的两个量表:心脏康复障碍量表和原始规定量表。我们使用Spearman相关性将它们与缺勤率、心血管风险年龄和心脏康复持续时间相关联。

结果

障碍总分是31±6,平均得分是1.47±0.31。主要障碍子量表与“出行/劳动纠纷”和“个人问题/家庭”有关。在一个月内可安排的课程中,缺勤率为8.4%。失误和取消与心血管风险呈正相关(p = 0.01;r = 0.4),与基线规定量表呈负相关(p = 0.03;r = -0.35),与年龄呈负相关(p = 0.02;r = -0.35)。

结论

“出行/劳动纠纷”、“个人/家庭问题”以及初始规定较低是圣保罗一家综合医院心脏康复计划中缺勤的主要因素。

相似文献

1
Evaluating compliance to a cardiac rehabilitation program in a private general hospital.评估一家私立综合医院对心脏康复计划的依从性。
Einstein (Sao Paulo). 2013 Jul-Sep;11(3):278-84. doi: 10.1590/s1679-45082013000300004.
2
Barriers to participation in center-based cardiac rehabilitation programs and patients' attitude toward home-based cardiac rehabilitation programs.参与中心式心脏康复计划的障碍和患者对家庭式心脏康复计划的态度。
Physiother Theory Pract. 2021 Jan;37(1):158-168. doi: 10.1080/09593985.2019.1620388. Epub 2019 Jun 3.
3
A Randomized, Controlled, Crossover Trial of Virtual Reality in Maintenance Cardiovascular Rehabilitation in a Low-Resource Setting: Impact on Adherence, Motivation, and Engagement.虚拟现实在资源匮乏环境下维持性心血管康复中的随机、对照、交叉试验:对依从性、动机和参与度的影响。
Phys Ther. 2021 May 4;101(5). doi: 10.1093/ptj/pzab071.
4
Exploration of a nurse practitioner-led phase two cardiac rehabilitation programme on attendance and compliance.探索以护士从业者为主导的第二期心脏康复计划对出勤率和依从性的影响。
J Clin Nurs. 2020 Mar;29(5-6):785-793. doi: 10.1111/jocn.15133. Epub 2019 Dec 18.
5
Analysis of Barriers to Public and Private Cardiac Rehabilitation Programs in Patients with Low and High Adherence.高低依从性患者参与公立和私立心脏康复项目的障碍分析。
Braz J Cardiovasc Surg. 2023 Apr 23;38(2):235-243. doi: 10.21470/1678-9741-2021-0436.
6
Barriers to cardiac rehabilitation delivery in a low-resource setting from the perspective of healthcare administrators, rehabilitation providers, and cardiac patients.在资源匮乏的环境下,从医疗保健管理人员、康复服务提供者和心脏病患者的角度来看,心脏康复服务提供面临的障碍。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Sep 2;19(1):615. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4463-9.
7
The Birmingham Rehabilitation Uptake Maximisation Study (BRUM). Home-based compared with hospital-based cardiac rehabilitation in a multi-ethnic population: cost-effectiveness and patient adherence.伯明翰康复利用率最大化研究(BRUM)。多民族人群中家庭心脏康复与医院心脏康复的比较:成本效益和患者依从性。
Health Technol Assess. 2007 Sep;11(35):1-118. doi: 10.3310/hta11350.
8
Factors Associated With Attendance at a 1-yr Post-Cardiac Rehabilitation Risk Factor Check.与参加 1 年后心脏康复风险因素检查相关的因素。
J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev. 2020 May;40(3):E22-E25. doi: 10.1097/HCR.0000000000000486.
9
Barriers to outpatient cardiac rehabilitation participation and adherence.门诊心脏康复参与和依从性的障碍。
J Cardiopulm Rehabil. 2000 Jul-Aug;20(4):241-6. doi: 10.1097/00008483-200007000-00005.
10
Patient participation in a cardiac rehabilitation program.患者参与心脏康复计划。
J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev. 2013 May-Jun;33(3):185-8. doi: 10.1097/HCR.0b013e318282551a.

引用本文的文献

1
Barriers to cardiac rehabilitation and their association with hospital readmission in patients with heart failure.心力衰竭患者心脏康复的障碍及其与再次入院的关联
Einstein (Sao Paulo). 2025 Mar 17;23:eAO0713. doi: 10.31744/einstein_journal/2025AO0713. eCollection 2025.
2
Digital Health for Patients Undergoing Cardiac Surgery: A Systematic Review.心脏手术患者的数字健康:一项系统综述
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Aug 28;11(17):2411. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11172411.
3
Analysis of Barriers to Public and Private Cardiac Rehabilitation Programs in Patients with Low and High Adherence.高低依从性患者参与公立和私立心脏康复项目的障碍分析。
Braz J Cardiovasc Surg. 2023 Apr 23;38(2):235-243. doi: 10.21470/1678-9741-2021-0436.
4
Examining Facilitators and Barriers to Cardiac Rehabilitation Adherence in a Low-Resource Setting in Latin America from Multiple Perspectives.从多个视角审视拉丁美洲资源匮乏环境中心脏康复治疗依从性的促进因素和阻碍因素。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Feb 9;19(4):1911. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19041911.
5
Publicly versus privately funded cardiac rehabilitation: access and adherence barriers. A cross-sectional study.公开筹资与私人筹资的心脏康复:获取和坚持的障碍。一项横断面研究。
Sao Paulo Med J. 2022 Jan-Feb;140(1):108-114. doi: 10.1590/1516-3180.2020.0782.R1.31052021.
6
Cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric validation of the Persian version of the Cardiac Rehabilitation Barriers Scale (CRBS-P).跨文化调适与心理计量验证波斯版本的心脏康复障碍量表(CRBS-P)。
BMJ Open. 2020 Jun 21;10(6):e034552. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034552.
7
Predictors of adherence to home-based cardiac rehabilitation program among coronary artery disease outpatients in China.中国冠心病门诊患者家庭心脏康复计划依从性的预测因素
J Geriatr Cardiol. 2019 Oct;16(10):749-755. doi: 10.11909/j.issn.1671-5411.2019.10.003.
8
Development and Psychometric Evaluation of the Cardiac Rehabilitation Adherence Tool (CRAT).心脏康复依从性工具(CRAT)的开发与心理测量评估
J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2019 Jul 9;6(3):25. doi: 10.3390/jcdd6030025.
9
Lymphedema outcomes in patients with head and neck cancer.头颈癌患者的淋巴水肿结局
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2015 Feb;152(2):284-291. doi: 10.1177/0194599814558402. Epub 2014 Nov 11.
10
Global availability of cardiac rehabilitation.心脏康复在全球的可及性。
Nat Rev Cardiol. 2014 Oct;11(10):586-96. doi: 10.1038/nrcardio.2014.98. Epub 2014 Jul 15.

本文引用的文献

1
Effective secondary prevention through cardiac rehabilitation after coronary revascularization and predictors of poor adherence to lifestyle modification and medication. Results of the ICAROS Survey.经冠状动脉血运重建后的心脏康复进行有效二级预防及生活方式改变和药物治疗依从性差的预测因素。ICAROS 调查结果。
Int J Cardiol. 2013 Aug 20;167(4):1390-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2012.04.069. Epub 2012 May 8.
2
Development and validation of the Brazilian Portuguese version of the Cardiac Rehabilitation Barriers Scale.《心脏康复障碍量表巴西葡萄牙语版的编制与验证》。
Arq Bras Cardiol. 2012 Apr;98(4):344-51. doi: 10.1590/s0066-782x2012005000025. Epub 2012 Mar 15.
3
Adherence behavior in the prevention and treatment of cardiovascular disease.心血管疾病防治中的依从行为。
J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev. 2012 Mar-Apr;32(2):63-70. doi: 10.1097/HCR.0b013e318235c729.
4
Psychometric validation of the cardiac rehabilitation barriers scale.心脏康复障碍量表的心理测量学验证。
Clin Rehabil. 2012 Feb;26(2):152-64. doi: 10.1177/0269215511410579. Epub 2011 Sep 21.
5
Barriers to cardiac rehabilitation: DOES AGE MAKE A DIFFERENCE?心脏康复的障碍:年龄有影响吗?
J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev. 2009 May-Jun;29(3):183-7. doi: 10.1097/HCR.0b013e3181a3333c.
6
Assessing patients' beliefs about cardiac rehabilitation as a basis for predicting attendance after acute myocardial infarction.评估患者对心脏康复的看法,以此作为预测急性心肌梗死后参与康复情况的依据。
Heart. 2007 Jan;93(1):53-8. doi: 10.1136/hrt.2005.081299. Epub 2006 Aug 11.
7
[Guideline for cardiopulmonary and metabolic rehabilitation: practical aspects].[心肺与代谢康复指南:实践要点]
Arq Bras Cardiol. 2006 Jan;86(1):74-82. doi: 10.1590/s0066-782x2006000100011. Epub 2006 Feb 13.
8
A realist study of the mechanisms of cardiac rehabilitation.一项关于心脏康复机制的现实主义研究。
J Adv Nurs. 2005 Nov;52(4):362-71. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2005.03601.x.
9
Cardiac rehabilitation and secondary prevention of coronary heart disease: an American Heart Association scientific statement from the Council on Clinical Cardiology (Subcommittee on Exercise, Cardiac Rehabilitation, and Prevention) and the Council on Nutrition, Physical Activity, and Metabolism (Subcommittee on Physical Activity), in collaboration with the American association of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Rehabilitation.冠心病的心脏康复与二级预防:美国心脏协会临床心脏病学委员会(运动、心脏康复与预防小组委员会)及营养、体育活动与新陈代谢委员会(体育活动小组委员会)联合美国心血管和肺康复协会发布的科学声明
Circulation. 2005 Jan 25;111(3):369-76. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000151788.08740.5C.
10
[Standardization of equipment and technics for supervised cardiovascular rehabilitation].[心血管康复监护的设备与技术标准化]
Arq Bras Cardiol. 2004 Nov;83(5):448-52. doi: 10.1590/s0066-782x2004001700012. Epub 2004 Nov 11.