Suppr超能文献

评估一家私立综合医院对心脏康复计划的依从性。

Evaluating compliance to a cardiac rehabilitation program in a private general hospital.

作者信息

Mair Vanessa, Breda Ana Paula, Nunes Marcos Eduardo Boquembuzo, Matos Luciana Diniz Nagem Janot de

出版信息

Einstein (Sao Paulo). 2013 Jul-Sep;11(3):278-84. doi: 10.1590/s1679-45082013000300004.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Identify the primary factors that influenced the participant in our cardiovascular rehabilitation program towards missing their therapy sessions, and to correlate those factors with age, cardiovascular risk, and motivation of our population.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective study with 42 patients (69.15±13.93 years) participating in the cardiac rehabilitation program at a general hospital in São Paulo, through the analysis of two scales applied during the initial evaluation: Cardiac Rehabilitation Barriers Scale and scale of the original provision. We used Spearman correlation to relate them to absenteeism, cardiovascular risk age and duration of cardiac rehabilitation.

RESULTS

The total score of barriers was 31±6 and the mean score of 1.47±0.31. The main barriers subscales were related to "travel/labor dispute" and "personal problems/family." The percentage of absenteeism was 8.4% in the number of sessions that could be made in the month. The faults and cancellations were positively correlated with cardiovascular risk (p=0.01; r=0.4) and negatively with scale provision of baseline (p=0.03; r=-0.35) and age (p=0.02; r=-0.35).

CONCLUSION

"Travel/labor dispute", "personal/ family problems", and low initial provision are the main factors absenteism in a cardiac rehabilitation program in a general hospital in São Paulo.

摘要

目的

确定影响参与我们心血管康复计划的参与者错过治疗课程的主要因素,并将这些因素与我们研究对象的年龄、心血管风险和积极性相关联。

方法

我们对圣保罗一家综合医院参与心脏康复计划的42名患者(69.15±13.93岁)进行了一项回顾性研究,通过分析初始评估期间应用的两个量表:心脏康复障碍量表和原始规定量表。我们使用Spearman相关性将它们与缺勤率、心血管风险年龄和心脏康复持续时间相关联。

结果

障碍总分是31±6,平均得分是1.47±0.31。主要障碍子量表与“出行/劳动纠纷”和“个人问题/家庭”有关。在一个月内可安排的课程中,缺勤率为8.4%。失误和取消与心血管风险呈正相关(p = 0.01;r = 0.4),与基线规定量表呈负相关(p = 0.03;r = -0.35),与年龄呈负相关(p = 0.02;r = -0.35)。

结论

“出行/劳动纠纷”、“个人/家庭问题”以及初始规定较低是圣保罗一家综合医院心脏康复计划中缺勤的主要因素。

相似文献

1
Evaluating compliance to a cardiac rehabilitation program in a private general hospital.
Einstein (Sao Paulo). 2013 Jul-Sep;11(3):278-84. doi: 10.1590/s1679-45082013000300004.
2
Barriers to participation in center-based cardiac rehabilitation programs and patients' attitude toward home-based cardiac rehabilitation programs.
Physiother Theory Pract. 2021 Jan;37(1):158-168. doi: 10.1080/09593985.2019.1620388. Epub 2019 Jun 3.
4
Exploration of a nurse practitioner-led phase two cardiac rehabilitation programme on attendance and compliance.
J Clin Nurs. 2020 Mar;29(5-6):785-793. doi: 10.1111/jocn.15133. Epub 2019 Dec 18.
5
Analysis of Barriers to Public and Private Cardiac Rehabilitation Programs in Patients with Low and High Adherence.
Braz J Cardiovasc Surg. 2023 Apr 23;38(2):235-243. doi: 10.21470/1678-9741-2021-0436.
8
Factors Associated With Attendance at a 1-yr Post-Cardiac Rehabilitation Risk Factor Check.
J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev. 2020 May;40(3):E22-E25. doi: 10.1097/HCR.0000000000000486.
9
Barriers to outpatient cardiac rehabilitation participation and adherence.
J Cardiopulm Rehabil. 2000 Jul-Aug;20(4):241-6. doi: 10.1097/00008483-200007000-00005.
10
Patient participation in a cardiac rehabilitation program.
J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev. 2013 May-Jun;33(3):185-8. doi: 10.1097/HCR.0b013e318282551a.

引用本文的文献

1
Barriers to cardiac rehabilitation and their association with hospital readmission in patients with heart failure.
Einstein (Sao Paulo). 2025 Mar 17;23:eAO0713. doi: 10.31744/einstein_journal/2025AO0713. eCollection 2025.
2
Digital Health for Patients Undergoing Cardiac Surgery: A Systematic Review.
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Aug 28;11(17):2411. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11172411.
3
Analysis of Barriers to Public and Private Cardiac Rehabilitation Programs in Patients with Low and High Adherence.
Braz J Cardiovasc Surg. 2023 Apr 23;38(2):235-243. doi: 10.21470/1678-9741-2021-0436.
5
Publicly versus privately funded cardiac rehabilitation: access and adherence barriers. A cross-sectional study.
Sao Paulo Med J. 2022 Jan-Feb;140(1):108-114. doi: 10.1590/1516-3180.2020.0782.R1.31052021.
7
Predictors of adherence to home-based cardiac rehabilitation program among coronary artery disease outpatients in China.
J Geriatr Cardiol. 2019 Oct;16(10):749-755. doi: 10.11909/j.issn.1671-5411.2019.10.003.
8
Development and Psychometric Evaluation of the Cardiac Rehabilitation Adherence Tool (CRAT).
J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2019 Jul 9;6(3):25. doi: 10.3390/jcdd6030025.
9
Lymphedema outcomes in patients with head and neck cancer.
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2015 Feb;152(2):284-291. doi: 10.1177/0194599814558402. Epub 2014 Nov 11.
10
Global availability of cardiac rehabilitation.
Nat Rev Cardiol. 2014 Oct;11(10):586-96. doi: 10.1038/nrcardio.2014.98. Epub 2014 Jul 15.

本文引用的文献

2
Development and validation of the Brazilian Portuguese version of the Cardiac Rehabilitation Barriers Scale.
Arq Bras Cardiol. 2012 Apr;98(4):344-51. doi: 10.1590/s0066-782x2012005000025. Epub 2012 Mar 15.
3
Adherence behavior in the prevention and treatment of cardiovascular disease.
J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev. 2012 Mar-Apr;32(2):63-70. doi: 10.1097/HCR.0b013e318235c729.
4
Psychometric validation of the cardiac rehabilitation barriers scale.
Clin Rehabil. 2012 Feb;26(2):152-64. doi: 10.1177/0269215511410579. Epub 2011 Sep 21.
5
Barriers to cardiac rehabilitation: DOES AGE MAKE A DIFFERENCE?
J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev. 2009 May-Jun;29(3):183-7. doi: 10.1097/HCR.0b013e3181a3333c.
7
[Guideline for cardiopulmonary and metabolic rehabilitation: practical aspects].
Arq Bras Cardiol. 2006 Jan;86(1):74-82. doi: 10.1590/s0066-782x2006000100011. Epub 2006 Feb 13.
8
A realist study of the mechanisms of cardiac rehabilitation.
J Adv Nurs. 2005 Nov;52(4):362-71. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2005.03601.x.
10
[Standardization of equipment and technics for supervised cardiovascular rehabilitation].
Arq Bras Cardiol. 2004 Nov;83(5):448-52. doi: 10.1590/s0066-782x2004001700012. Epub 2004 Nov 11.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验