• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

心脏康复障碍量表的心理测量学验证。

Psychometric validation of the cardiac rehabilitation barriers scale.

机构信息

York University, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

Clin Rehabil. 2012 Feb;26(2):152-64. doi: 10.1177/0269215511410579. Epub 2011 Sep 21.

DOI:10.1177/0269215511410579
PMID:21937522
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3351783/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to investigate the factor structure and psychometric properties of the Cardiac Rehabilitation Barriers Scale (CRBS).

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: In total, 2636 cardiac inpatients from 11 hospitals completed a survey. One year later, participants completed a follow-up survey, which included the CRBS. A subsample of patients also completed a third survey which included the CRBS, the Cardiac Rehabilitation Enrolment Obstacles scale, and the Beliefs About Cardiac Rehabilitation scale three weeks later. The CRBS asked participants to rate 21 cardiac rehabilitation barriers on a five-point Likert scale regardless of cardiac rehabilitation referral or enrolment.

RESULTS

Maximum likelihood factor analysis with oblique rotation resulted in a four-factor solution: perceived need/healthcare factors (eigenvalue = 6.13, Cronbach's α = .89), logistical factors (eigenvalue = 5.83, Cronbach's α = .88), work/time conflicts (eigenvalue = 3.78, Cronbach's α = .71), and comorbidities/functional status (eigenvalue = 4.85, Cronbach's α = .83). Mean total perceived barriers were significantly greater among non-enrollees than cardiac rehabilitation enrollees (P < .001). Convergent validity with the Beliefs About Cardiac Rehabilitation and Cardiac Rehabilitation Enrolment Obstacles scales was also demonstrated. Test-retest reliability of the CRBS was acceptable (intraclass correlation coefficient = .64).

CONCLUSION

The CRBS consists of four subscales and has sound psychometric properties. The extent to which identified barriers can be addressed to facilitate greater cardiac rehabilitation utilization warrants future study.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在探讨心脏康复障碍量表(CRBS)的结构因素和心理测量特性。

设计、地点和参与者:共有来自 11 家医院的 2636 名住院心脏病患者完成了一项调查。一年后,参与者完成了一项随访调查,其中包括 CRBS。部分患者还在三周后完成了第三次调查,其中包括 CRBS、心脏康复登记障碍量表和对心脏康复的信念量表。CRBS 要求参与者在五点李克特量表上对 21 个心脏康复障碍进行评分,无论是否有心脏康复推荐或登记。

结果

采用斜交旋转的最大似然因子分析得到了一个四因素解决方案:感知需求/医疗保健因素(特征值=6.13,Cronbach's α=.89)、逻辑因素(特征值=5.83,Cronbach's α=.88)、工作/时间冲突(特征值=3.78,Cronbach's α=.71)和合并症/功能状态(特征值=4.85,Cronbach's α=.83)。未登记患者的总感知障碍明显高于心脏康复登记患者(P<0.001)。与对心脏康复的信念和心脏康复登记障碍量表的收敛效度也得到了证明。CRBS 的重测信度是可以接受的(组内相关系数=0.64)。

结论

CRBS 由四个分量表组成,具有良好的心理测量特性。未来需要进一步研究识别出的障碍在多大程度上可以得到解决,以促进更多的心脏康复利用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ffc9/3351783/e67e54fc71b6/10.1177_0269215511410579-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ffc9/3351783/e67e54fc71b6/10.1177_0269215511410579-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ffc9/3351783/e67e54fc71b6/10.1177_0269215511410579-fig1.jpg

相似文献

1
Psychometric validation of the cardiac rehabilitation barriers scale.心脏康复障碍量表的心理测量学验证。
Clin Rehabil. 2012 Feb;26(2):152-64. doi: 10.1177/0269215511410579. Epub 2011 Sep 21.
2
Cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric validation of the Persian version of the Cardiac Rehabilitation Barriers Scale (CRBS-P).跨文化调适与心理计量验证波斯版本的心脏康复障碍量表(CRBS-P)。
BMJ Open. 2020 Jun 21;10(6):e034552. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034552.
3
Translation, Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Psychometric Validation of the Greek Version of the Cardiac Rehabilitation Barriers Scale (CRBS-GR): What Are the Barriers in South-East Europe?希腊版心脏康复障碍量表(CRBS-GR)的翻译、跨文化调适及心理计量学验证:东南欧的障碍有哪些?
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Feb 24;20(5):4064. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20054064.
4
Psychometric validation of the Cardiac Rehabilitation Barriers Scale Revised (CRBS-R) for hybrid delivery.适用于混合式交付的心脏康复障碍量表修订版(CRBS-R)的心理测量学验证。
BMJ Open. 2024 Oct 15;14(10):e090261. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-090261.
5
Translation, Adaptation, and Validation of the Malay Version of the Cardiac Rehabilitation Barriers Scale.马来版心脏康复障碍量表的翻译、改编和验证。
J Nurs Res. 2020 Feb;28(1):e64. doi: 10.1097/jnr.0000000000000328.
6
Reliability of the Scale of Barriers for Cardiac Rehabilitation in the Colombian Population.哥伦比亚人群心脏康复障碍量表的可靠性
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Apr 20;18(8):4351. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18084351.
7
Translation and validation of the cardiac rehabilitation barriers scale in the Czech Republic (CRBS-CZE): Protocol to determine the key barriers in East-Central Europe.捷克共和国心脏康复障碍量表(CRBS-CZE)的翻译与验证:确定中东欧关键障碍的方案
Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Mar;99(11):e19546. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000019546.
8
Validity and Reliability of the Cardiac Rehabilitation Barriers Scale in the Czech Republic (CRBS-CZE): Determination of Key Barriers in East-Central Europe.捷克共和国心脏康复障碍量表(CRBS-CZE)的有效性和可靠性:中欧东部关键障碍的确定。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Dec 12;18(24):13113. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182413113.
9
Development and validation of the Brazilian Portuguese version of the Cardiac Rehabilitation Barriers Scale.《心脏康复障碍量表巴西葡萄牙语版的编制与验证》。
Arq Bras Cardiol. 2012 Apr;98(4):344-51. doi: 10.1590/s0066-782x2012005000025. Epub 2012 Mar 15.
10
Translation, Cross-cultural Adaptation and Psychometric Validation of the Korean-Language Cardiac Rehabilitation Barriers Scale (CRBS-K).韩语版心脏康复障碍量表(CRBS-K)的翻译、跨文化调适及心理测量学验证
Ann Rehabil Med. 2017 Oct;41(5):858-867. doi: 10.5535/arm.2017.41.5.858. Epub 2017 Oct 31.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluation of the Psychometric Properties of the Thai Version of the Cardiac Rehabilitation Barriers Scale.泰文版心脏康复障碍量表的心理测量学特性评估
Ann Rehabil Med. 2025 Aug;49(4):246-256. doi: 10.5535/arm.250022. Epub 2025 Aug 29.
2
Psychometric validation of the Cardiac Rehabilitation Barriers Scale Revised (CRBS-R) for hybrid delivery.适用于混合式交付的心脏康复障碍量表修订版(CRBS-R)的心理测量学验证。
BMJ Open. 2024 Oct 15;14(10):e090261. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-090261.
3
Sex and gender specific pitfalls and challenges in cardiac rehabilitation: a working hypothesis towards better inclusivity in cardiac rehabilitation programmes.

本文引用的文献

1
Barriers to cardiac rehabilitation: DOES AGE MAKE A DIFFERENCE?心脏康复的障碍:年龄有影响吗?
J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev. 2009 May-Jun;29(3):183-7. doi: 10.1097/HCR.0b013e3181a3333c.
2
A multisite examination of sex differences in cardiac rehabilitation barriers by participation status.一项基于参与状况对心脏康复障碍中性别差异的多中心研究。
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2009 Feb;18(2):209-16. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2007.0753.
3
Referral to outpatient cardiac rehabilitation: intervention research at the patient, provider, and health system levels.
心脏康复中性别特异性的陷阱与挑战:关于提高心脏康复项目包容性的一个工作假设
Eur Heart J Open. 2024 Sep 6;4(5):oeae071. doi: 10.1093/ehjopen/oeae071. eCollection 2024 Sep.
4
Rehabilitation exercise quality assessment through supervised contrastive learning with hard and soft negatives.通过带有硬负样本和软负样本的监督对比学习进行康复运动质量评估。
Med Biol Eng Comput. 2025 Jan;63(1):15-28. doi: 10.1007/s11517-024-03177-x. Epub 2024 Jul 31.
5
The Translation, Culture-Adaptation and Psychometric Evaluation of the Cardiac Rehabilitation Barriers Scale Among Chinese Older Population.中国老年人群心脏康复障碍量表的翻译、文化调适及心理测量学评估
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2024 Feb 17;17:723-734. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S450135. eCollection 2024.
6
Barriers and Facilitators to Delivering Inpatient Cardiac Rehabilitation: A Scoping Review.住院心脏康复实施的障碍与促进因素:一项范围综述
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2023 Aug 16;16:2361-2376. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S418803. eCollection 2023.
7
A scale for measuring home-based cardiac rehabilitation exercise adherence: a development and validation study.一种用于测量家庭心脏康复运动依从性的量表:一项开发与验证研究。
BMC Nurs. 2023 Aug 7;22(1):259. doi: 10.1186/s12912-023-01426-2.
8
Global perspectives on heart disease rehabilitation and secondary prevention: a scientific statement from the Association of Cardiovascular Nursing and Allied Professions, European Association of Preventive Cardiology, and International Council of Cardiovascular Prevention and Rehabilitation.全球视角下的心脏病康复和二级预防:心血管护理和相关专业协会、欧洲预防心脏病学协会和国际心血管预防与康复理事会的科学声明。
Eur Heart J. 2023 Jul 21;44(28):2515-2525. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehad225.
9
Factors Affecting Referral and Patient Access to Heart Function Clinics in Ontario: A Qualitative Study of Stakeholders.影响安大略省心脏功能诊所转诊及患者就诊的因素:一项利益相关者的定性研究
CJC Open. 2023 Mar 9;5(6):421-428. doi: 10.1016/j.cjco.2023.03.002. eCollection 2023 Jun.
10
Sex differences in cardiac rehabilitation barriers among non-enrollees in the context of lower gender equality: a cross-sectional study.在性别平等程度较低的情况下,非注册心脏康复者中心血管康复障碍的性别差异:一项横断面研究。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2023 Jun 29;23(1):329. doi: 10.1186/s12872-023-03331-7.
转介至门诊心脏康复:患者、医护人员及卫生系统层面的干预研究
Nat Clin Pract Cardiovasc Med. 2008 Oct;5(10):671-2. doi: 10.1038/ncpcardio1320. Epub 2008 Aug 12.
4
Missing data analysis: making it work in the real world.缺失数据分析:使其在现实世界中发挥作用。
Annu Rev Psychol. 2009;60:549-76. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.58.110405.085530.
5
Validation of the revised cardiac rehabilitation preference form in patients with post-percutaneous coronary intervention.
J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev. 2007 Nov-Dec;27(6):390-4. doi: 10.1097/01.HCR.0000300267.92516.23.
6
Development and preliminary testing of the Cardiac Rehabilitation Enrolment Obstacles (CREO) scale: implications for service development.心脏康复登记障碍(CREO)量表的开发与初步测试:对服务发展的启示
Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2008 Jun;7(2):96-102. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcnurse.2007.09.002. Epub 2007 Oct 18.
7
Use of cardiac rehabilitation by Medicare beneficiaries after myocardial infarction or coronary bypass surgery.医疗保险受益人在心肌梗死或冠状动脉搭桥手术后进行心脏康复治疗的情况。
Circulation. 2007 Oct 9;116(15):1653-62. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.701466. Epub 2007 Sep 24.
8
Assessing patients' beliefs about cardiac rehabilitation as a basis for predicting attendance after acute myocardial infarction.评估患者对心脏康复的看法,以此作为预测急性心肌梗死后参与康复情况的依据。
Heart. 2007 Jan;93(1):53-8. doi: 10.1136/hrt.2005.081299. Epub 2006 Aug 11.
9
Referral to and discharge from cardiac rehabilitation: key informant views on continuity of care.心脏康复的转诊与出院:关键信息提供者对连续护理的看法
J Eval Clin Pract. 2006 Apr;12(2):155-63. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2006.00528.x.
10
Older adults' views of cardiac rehabilitation program: is it time to reinvent?老年人对心脏康复项目的看法:是时候进行重塑了吗?
J Gerontol Nurs. 2006 Feb;32(2):37-44. doi: 10.3928/0098-9134-20060201-10.