Brissette Ian, Wales Kathleen, O'Connell Meghan
Research Scientist, (
J Sch Health. 2013 Nov;83(11):757-62. doi: 10.1111/josh.12091.
Addressing the limitations of existing Local Wellness Policies (LWPs) and promoting their implementation remain priorities for health and education agencies. One gap has been the absence of a standard assessment to support LWP revision. During planning for an initiative to improve school nutrition and physical education policy, the Wellness School Assessment Tool (WellSAT) was evaluated.
Five public health practitioners used WellSAT to assess 50 LWPs. A randomized, counterbalanced design ensured each LWP was coded twice by separate raters. Models evaluated the extent to which WellSAT ratings reflected differences in the LWPs and order, familiarity and rater effects. During field testing, 18 public health practitioners used WellSAT as part of a statewide public health initiative.
In pilot testing the majority of the variability in WellSAT scores (median = 88%; range = 76% to 100%) was attributable to differences between policies. Correlations between independent raters' strength and comprehensiveness scores were strong, r = .88 and r = .77, respectively. During field testing, WellSAT was well accepted by public health practitioners and members of the school community.
WellSAT represents a reliable and feasible tool for health and education agencies to use in improving LWPs and aligning them with recognized standards.
解决现有地方健康政策(LWPs)的局限性并促进其实施仍然是卫生和教育机构的优先事项。一个差距是缺乏支持LWPs修订的标准评估。在规划一项改善学校营养和体育教育政策的倡议时,对健康学校评估工具(WellSAT)进行了评估。
五名公共卫生从业者使用WellSAT评估50项LWPs。随机、平衡设计确保每个LWPs由不同的评分者编码两次。模型评估了WellSAT评分在多大程度上反映了LWPs的差异以及顺序、熟悉程度和评分者效应。在现场测试中,18名公共卫生从业者将WellSAT用作全州公共卫生倡议的一部分。
在试点测试中,WellSAT分数的大部分变异性(中位数=88%;范围=76%至100%)可归因于政策之间的差异。独立评分者的强度和全面性分数之间的相关性很强,分别为r=.88和r=.77。在现场测试中,WellSAT受到了公共卫生从业者和学校社区成员的广泛接受。
WellSAT是卫生和教育机构用于改进LWPs并使其符合公认标准的可靠且可行的工具。