• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

制定和验证校园和工作场所政策、机会、倡议和显著议题(POINTS)审计。

Development and Validation of the Policies, Opportunities, Initiatives and Notable Topics (POINTS) Audit for Campuses and Worksites.

机构信息

Department of Public Health Food Studies and Nutrition, Syracuse University, Syracuse, NY 13244, USA.

Department of Food and Nutrition, Augusta University Medical Center, Augusta, GA 30904, USA.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Mar 4;16(5):778. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16050778.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph16050778
PMID:30836633
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6427413/
Abstract

Workplace or campus wellness/obesity-prevention policies and initiatives can improve health. Research tools to assess worksite or campus policies/initiatives are scarce. Thus, the aim of this research is to develop and validate the policies, opportunities, initiatives, and notable topics (POINTS) audit. POINTS was developed and refined via expert review, pilot-testing, and field testing. Trained researchers completed a web-based review from a student-focus or employee-focus regarding 34 health-promoting topics for colleges. Each topic was evaluated on a 0⁻2 scale: 0 = no policy/initiative, 1 = initiatives, 2 = written policy. When a written policy was detected, additional policy support questions (administered, monitored, reviewed) were completed. Cronbach's Alpha for the student-focused POINTS audit was = 0.787 (34 items, possible points = 65), and for the employee-focused POINTS audit was = 0.807 (26 items, possible points = 50). A total of 115 student-focused and 33 employee-focused audits were completed. Although there was little evidence of policy presence beyond stimulant standards (smoking and alcohol), there were extensive examples of health initiatives. The student-focused POINTS audit was validated using the Healthier Campus Initiative's survey. POINTS is a web-based audit tool that is valid and useful for pre-assessment, advocacy, benchmarking, and tracking policies for health and well-being for students (campus) and employees (worksite).

摘要

工作场所或校园健康/肥胖预防政策和举措可以改善健康状况。评估工作场所或校园政策/举措的研究工具稀缺。因此,本研究旨在开发和验证政策、机会、举措和显著主题 (POINTS) 审计。POINTS 通过专家审查、试点测试和现场测试得以开发和完善。经过培训的研究人员从学生或员工的角度,针对高校的 34 个促进健康的主题,通过网络完成了一项审查。每个主题都根据 0-2 分制进行评估:0=无政策/举措,1=举措,2=书面政策。当发现书面政策时,会完成额外的政策支持问题(管理、监测、审查)。学生重点 POINTS 审计的克朗巴赫 α 系数为 0.787(34 个项目,可能的分数为 65),员工重点 POINTS 审计的克朗巴赫 α 系数为 0.807(26 个项目,可能的分数为 50)。共完成了 115 份学生重点和 33 份员工重点审计。虽然除了兴奋剂标准(吸烟和饮酒)之外,几乎没有政策存在的证据,但有大量健康举措的例子。学生重点 POINTS 审计使用了“更健康校园倡议”的调查进行验证。POINTS 是一种基于网络的审计工具,可用于学生(校园)和员工(工作场所)的健康和福祉的预评估、宣传、基准测试和跟踪政策,具有有效性和实用性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f666/6427413/5539c54fc93b/ijerph-16-00778-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f666/6427413/5539c54fc93b/ijerph-16-00778-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f666/6427413/5539c54fc93b/ijerph-16-00778-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Development and Validation of the Policies, Opportunities, Initiatives and Notable Topics (POINTS) Audit for Campuses and Worksites.制定和验证校园和工作场所政策、机会、倡议和显著议题(POINTS)审计。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Mar 4;16(5):778. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16050778.
2
Redesign, Field-Testing, and Validation of the Physical Activity Campus Environmental Supports (PACES) Audit.重新设计、现场测试和验证《校园体力活动环境支持(PACES)评估》。
J Environ Public Health. 2019 May 19;2019:5819752. doi: 10.1155/2019/5819752. eCollection 2019.
3
Statewide diffusion of 100% tobacco-free college and university policies.全面推行高校无烟政策。
Tob Control. 2010 Aug;19(4):311-7. doi: 10.1136/tc.2009.032888. Epub 2010 May 14.
4
Implementation of the Tobacco-Free Campus Policy on College Campuses: Evidence From a Survey of College Students in Beijing.大学校园无烟政策的实施:来自北京大学生调查的证据
Nicotine Tob Res. 2016 Nov;18(11):2083-2091. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntw125. Epub 2016 Apr 27.
5
Survey Development to Assess College Students' Perceptions of the Campus Environment.用于评估大学生对校园环境认知的调查开发
Am J Health Behav. 2017 Nov 1;41(6):701-709. doi: 10.5993/AJHB.41.6.4.
6
Cigarette butts near building entrances: what is the impact of smoke-free college campus policies?建筑物入口处的烟头:无烟大学校园政策有何影响?
Tob Control. 2013 Mar;22(2):107-12. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2011-050152. Epub 2011 Dec 1.
7
Assessment of college and university campus tobacco-free policies in North Carolina.评估北卡罗来纳州的学院和大学校园无烟政策。
J Am Coll Health. 2012;60(7):512-9. doi: 10.1080/07448481.2012.690464.
8
PACES: a Physical Activity Campus Environmental Supports Audit on university campuses.PACES:大学校园体育活动校园环境支持审计
Am J Health Promot. 2014 Mar-Apr;28(4):e104-17. doi: 10.4278/ajhp.121212-QUAN-604. Epub 2013 Nov 7.
9
Implementation of nutrition and physical activity-related policies and practices on college campuses participating in the Healthier Campus initiative.参与“更健康校园倡议”的大学校园内营养和身体活动相关政策和实践的实施。
J Am Coll Health. 2024 May-Jun;72(4):1192-1199. doi: 10.1080/07448481.2022.2071617. Epub 2022 May 12.
10
An assessment of workplace wellness policies and programs of universities in the Asia-Pacific.亚太地区高校工作场所健康政策和计划评估。
Work. 2023;75(3):837-847. doi: 10.3233/WOR-205068.

引用本文的文献

1
Evolution of 'whole institution' approaches to improving health in tertiary education settings: a critical scoping review.高等教育环境中改善健康的“整体机构”方法的演变:一项批判性综述。
Res Pap Educ. 2023 Jul 4;38(4):661-689. doi: 10.1080/02671522.2021.1961302. Epub 2021 Aug 25.
2
Community-Based Participatory Research: Partnering with College Students to Develop a Tailored, Wellness-Focused Intervention for University Campuses.基于社区的参与式研究:与大学生合作,为大学校园制定量身定制、注重健康的干预措施。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Dec 6;19(23):16331. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192316331.
3
Development of the University Food Environment Assessment (Uni-Food) Tool and Process to Benchmark the Healthiness, Equity, and Environmental Sustainability of University Food Environments.

本文引用的文献

1
Evaluation of a Mobile Farmer's Market Aimed at Increasing Fruit and Vegetable Consumption in Food Deserts: A Pilot Study to Determine Evaluation Feasibility.评估旨在增加食品荒漠地区水果和蔬菜消费量的流动农贸市场:确定评估可行性的一项试点研究。
Health Equity. 2018 Dec 18;2(1):375-383. doi: 10.1089/heq.2018.0003. eCollection 2018.
2
Hazardous Drinking among Students over a Decade of University Policy Change: Controlled Before-and-After Evaluation.十年来大学政策变化对学生饮酒危害的影响:对照前后评估。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Sep 28;15(10):2137. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15102137.
3
Best Practices and Innovative Solutions to Overcome Barriers to Delivering Policy, Systems and Environmental Changes in Rural Communities.
大学食品环境评估(Uni-Food)工具及流程的开发,用于衡量大学食品环境的健康性、公平性和环境可持续性。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Nov 12;18(22):11895. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182211895.
4
Redesign, Field-Testing, and Validation of the Physical Activity Campus Environmental Supports (PACES) Audit.重新设计、现场测试和验证《校园体力活动环境支持(PACES)评估》。
J Environ Public Health. 2019 May 19;2019:5819752. doi: 10.1155/2019/5819752. eCollection 2019.
农村社区实施政策、系统和环境改变的最佳实践和创新解决方案,以克服障碍。
Nutrients. 2018 Aug 3;10(8):1012. doi: 10.3390/nu10081012.
4
'Buying Salad Is a Lot More Expensive than Going to McDonalds': Young Adults' Views about What Influences Their Food Choices.“买沙拉比去麦当劳贵多了”:年轻人对影响其食物选择因素的看法。
Nutrients. 2018 Jul 30;10(8):996. doi: 10.3390/nu10080996.
5
Signs, Fines and Compliance Officers: A Systematic Review of Strategies for Enforcing Smoke-Free Policy.标志、罚款和合规官员:强化无烟政策执行策略的系统评价
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Jul 2;15(7):1386. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15071386.
6
Best Practices for Financial Sustainability of Healthy Food Service Guidelines in Hospital Cafeterias.医院自助餐厅健康食品服务指南的财务可持续性最佳实践
Prev Chronic Dis. 2018 May 17;15:E58. doi: 10.5888/pcd15.170477.
7
Neighborhood built environment and socioeconomic status in relation to physical activity, sedentary behavior, and weight status of adolescents.青少年的邻里建成环境与社会经济地位同体力活动、久坐行为和体重状况的关系。
Prev Med. 2018 May;110:47-54. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2018.02.009. Epub 2018 Feb 9.
8
A multi-level intervention in worksites to increase fruit and vegetable access and intake: Rationale, design and methods of the 'Good to Go' cluster randomized trial.一项在工作场所开展的多层次干预措施,以增加水果和蔬菜的可及性及摄入量:“准备就绪”整群随机试验的理论依据、设计与方法
Contemp Clin Trials. 2018 Feb;65:87-98. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2017.12.002. Epub 2017 Dec 12.
9
Assessing Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Health Co-Benefits: A Structured Review of Lifestyle-Related Climate Change Mitigation Strategies.评估温室气体排放与健康协同效益:对与生活方式相关的气候变化缓解策略的结构化综述
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017 Apr 27;14(5):468. doi: 10.3390/ijerph14050468.
10
Evidence-based policies on school nutrition and physical education: Associations with state-level collaboration, obesity, and socio-economic indicators.基于证据的学校营养与体育教育政策:与州级合作、肥胖及社会经济指标的关联
Prev Med. 2017 Jun;99:87-93. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2017.02.005. Epub 2017 Feb 13.