• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

国家卫生与保健卓越研究所临床指南队列的中位寿命约为 60 个月。

Median life span of a cohort of National Institute for Health and Care Excellence clinical guidelines was about 60 months.

机构信息

Centre for Clinical Practice, National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, Level 1A, City Tower, Piccadilly Plaza, Manchester M1 4BD, United Kingdom.

出版信息

J Clin Epidemiol. 2014 Jan;67(1):52-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2013.07.012. Epub 2013 Oct 16.

DOI:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2013.07.012
PMID:24139089
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To describe the length of time National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) clinical guidelines have remained valid.

STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING

The present study is a survival analysis of a cohort of published NICE clinical guidelines. The National Health Service in England and Wales uses NICE clinical practice guidelines as a reference for treatment and care of individuals. They need to be updated as new evidence arises, to remain credible and relevant, and are currently assessed 3 years after publication.

RESULTS

Survival analysis suggested that about 86% of guidelines are still up-to-date 3 years after their publication. The median life span was 60 months (95% confidence interval: 51, 69).

CONCLUSION

These findings are similar to those in other studies of the life span of guidelines. Efficient mechanisms must be in place to detect the minority of guidelines that become outdated quickly.

摘要

目的

描述国家卫生与保健优化研究所(NICE)临床指南的有效期有多长。

研究设计与设置

本研究是对一组已发表的 NICE 临床指南进行的生存分析。英格兰和威尔士的国民保健制度(NHS)将 NICE 临床实践指南用作治疗和护理个人的参考。随着新证据的出现,它们需要进行更新,以保持可信性和相关性,目前在发布后 3 年内进行评估。

结果

生存分析表明,大约 86%的指南在发布 3 年后仍然是最新的。中位寿命为 60 个月(95%置信区间:51,69)。

结论

这些发现与其他指南寿命研究的结果相似。必须建立有效的机制来发现少数迅速过时的指南。

相似文献

1
Median life span of a cohort of National Institute for Health and Care Excellence clinical guidelines was about 60 months.国家卫生与保健卓越研究所临床指南队列的中位寿命约为 60 个月。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2014 Jan;67(1):52-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2013.07.012. Epub 2013 Oct 16.
2
Working with NICE.与英国国家卫生与临床优化研究所合作。
J Fam Health Care. 2007;17(4):113-4.
3
Has NICE been nice to cancer?英国国家卫生与临床优化研究所(NICE)对癌症患者友好吗?
Eur J Cancer. 2006 Nov;42(17):2881-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2006.08.013. Epub 2006 Oct 27.
4
A summary of the methods that the National Clinical Guideline Centre uses to produce clinical guidelines for the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence.国家临床指南中心为英国国家卫生与临床优化研究所制作临床指南时所用方法概述。
Ann Intern Med. 2011 Jun 7;154(11):752-7. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-154-11-201106070-00007.
5
Mandatory implementation of NICE Guidelines for the care of bipolar disorder and other conditions in England and Wales.在英格兰和威尔士强制实施英国国家卫生与临床优化研究所(NICE)关于双相情感障碍及其他病症护理的指南。
BMC Med. 2015 Sep 30;13:246. doi: 10.1186/s12916-015-0464-7.
6
The National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence and its role in assessing the value of new cancer treatments in England and Wales.国家卫生与临床优化研究所及其在评估英格兰和威尔士新癌症疗法价值方面的作用。
Clin Cancer Res. 2011 Aug 1;17(15):4930-5. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-10-2510. Epub 2011 Jul 26.
7
National Clinical Guideline Centre cost-effectiveness assessment for the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence.国家临床指南中心为国家卫生与临床优化研究所进行的成本效益评估。
Ann Intern Med. 2011 Jun 7;154(11):758-65. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-154-11-201106070-00008.
8
Introducing the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence.介绍国家卫生与临床优化研究所。
Eur Heart J. 2012 Sep;33(17):2111-2.
9
Clinical effectiveness and cost effectiveness of zanamivir (Relenza): translating the evidence into clinical practice, a National Institute for Clinical Excellence view.扎那米韦(瑞乐沙)的临床疗效与成本效益:将证据转化为临床实践,英国国家临床优化研究所观点
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2001 Dec 29;356(1416):1899-903. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2001.1003.
10
Falls screening and assessment tools used in acute mental health settings: a review of policies in England and Wales.急性精神卫生环境中使用的跌倒筛查与评估工具:英格兰和威尔士政策综述
Physiotherapy. 2016 Jun;102(2):178-83. doi: 10.1016/j.physio.2015.04.010. Epub 2015 Jul 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessing TDApp: An AI-based clinical decision support system for ADHD treatment recommendations.评估TDApp:一种基于人工智能的用于多动症治疗建议的临床决策支持系统。
Front Psychiatry. 2025 Aug 22;16:1582746. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1582746. eCollection 2025.
2
Pre-Participation Evaluation of Recreational and Competitive Athletes - A Systematic Review of Guidelines and Consensus Statements.休闲及竞技运动员的赛前评估——指南与共识声明的系统评价
Sports Med Open. 2025 Apr 5;11(1):33. doi: 10.1186/s40798-025-00837-6.
3
Update of the clinical guideline for hypertension diagnosis and treatment in Iran.
伊朗高血压诊断与治疗临床指南的更新
Clin Hypertens. 2024 Jun 1;30(1):13. doi: 10.1186/s40885-024-00269-6.
4
Clinical care of childhood sexual abuse: a systematic review and critical appraisal of guidelines from European countries.儿童性虐待的临床护理:对欧洲国家指南的系统评价与批判性评估
Lancet Reg Health Eur. 2024 Feb 21;39:100868. doi: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2024.100868. eCollection 2024 Apr.
5
Appraisal of published guidelines in European countries addressing the clinical care of childhood sexual abuse: protocol for a systematic review.评估欧洲国家发布的有关儿童性虐待临床护理的指南:系统评价议定书。
BMJ Open. 2023 Apr 17;13(4):e064008. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-064008.
6
A critical appraisal of delirium clinical practice guidelines relevant to the care of older adults in the emergency department with a synthesis of recommendations: an umbrella review protocol.对与急诊科老年患者护理相关的谵妄临床实践指南进行批判性评估,并对建议进行综合:伞式综述方案。
Syst Rev. 2022 Dec 5;11(1):262. doi: 10.1186/s13643-022-02145-6.
7
Weekly updates of national living evidence-based guidelines: methods for the Australian living guidelines for care of people with COVID-19.国家生活循证指南每周更新:澳大利亚 COVID-19 患者护理生活指南的方法。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2021 Mar;131:11-21. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.11.005. Epub 2020 Nov 11.
8
Rate of change in investigational treatment options: An analysis of reports from a large precision oncology decision support effort.研究性治疗选择的变化率:一项来自大型精准肿瘤学决策支持工作的报告分析。
Int J Med Inform. 2020 Nov;143:104261. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2020.104261. Epub 2020 Aug 24.
9
Improving primary care management of asthma: do we know what really works?改善哮喘的初级保健管理:我们真的知道什么有效吗?
NPJ Prim Care Respir Med. 2020 Jun 17;30(1):29. doi: 10.1038/s41533-020-0184-0.
10
Developing and applying a 'living guidelines' approach to WHO recommendations on maternal and perinatal health.针对世界卫生组织关于孕产妇和围产期健康的建议,制定并应用一种“动态指南”方法。
BMJ Glob Health. 2019 Aug 19;4(4):e001683. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2019-001683. eCollection 2019.