• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

个人荒野关系:基于交易方法的构建。

Personal wilderness relationships: building on a transactional approach.

机构信息

Department of Recreation, Parks, and Leisure Services Administration, Central Michigan University, Finch Fieldhouse 108, Mount Pleasant, MI, 48859, USA,

出版信息

Environ Manage. 2013 Dec;52(6):1518-32. doi: 10.1007/s00267-013-0185-7. Epub 2013 Oct 19.

DOI:10.1007/s00267-013-0185-7
PMID:24142154
Abstract

Wilderness managers are charged with the challenging goal of balancing resource protection and experience quality across a broad, value-laden landscape. While research has provided insight into visitors' motivations and their meanings for wilderness, a struggle exists to implement experiential concepts within current management frameworks. This research posits the human experience of wilderness to be an evolving, enduring relationship, and that research needs can be addressed by conceptualizing and investigating an individuals' personal wilderness relationship. The purpose of this study was to explore wilderness relationships of visitors to the Boundary Waters Canoe Area Wilderness. A predictive model was proposed to investigate the internal dimensions of a visitor's wilderness relationship. A mail-back questionnaire was distributed during the summer of 2007, resulting in a sample of 564 respondents. Data were analyzed using confirmatory factor analysis and structural equation modeling. Results from testing several relationship models provided support for a multidimensional structure consisting of five factors with a single overarching relationship factor. The preferred relationship model indicated the importance of identities and attachment in place relationships. Trust and commitment toward management were also important considerations. This research provided the preliminary evidence for a multidimensional wilderness relationship model and complements a perspective of wilderness experiences as wilderness. Findings may help to reframe decision-making and public-input processes that guide management actions to increased wilderness character protection and facilitate quality wilderness experiences.

摘要

荒野管理者面临着一项艰巨的任务,即在广泛而充满价值观的背景下平衡资源保护和体验质量。尽管研究已经深入了解了游客的动机及其对荒野的意义,但在将体验概念融入当前管理框架方面仍存在困难。本研究认为,荒野的人类体验是一种不断发展的、持久的关系,通过概念化和研究个人的个人荒野关系,可以满足研究需求。本研究旨在探索边界水域独木舟地区荒野游客的荒野关系。提出了一个预测模型,以调查游客荒野关系的内部维度。2007 年夏天,通过邮件回寄问卷,共获得了 564 名受访者的样本。使用验证性因子分析和结构方程模型对数据进行了分析。对几种关系模型的测试结果为一个由五个因素组成的多维结构提供了支持,其中一个单一的总体关系因素。首选的关系模型表明,身份认同和对地方关系的依恋很重要。对管理的信任和承诺也是重要的考虑因素。本研究为多维荒野关系模型提供了初步证据,并补充了荒野体验作为荒野的观点。研究结果可能有助于重新制定指导管理行动的决策和公众投入过程,以增加荒野特征保护,并促进高质量的荒野体验。

相似文献

1
Personal wilderness relationships: building on a transactional approach.个人荒野关系:基于交易方法的构建。
Environ Manage. 2013 Dec;52(6):1518-32. doi: 10.1007/s00267-013-0185-7. Epub 2013 Oct 19.
2
Assessing the transactional nature of wilderness experiences: construct validation of the wilderness-hassles appraisal scale.评估荒野体验的交互性质:荒野困扰评估量表的结构效度验证。
Environ Manage. 2008 Sep;42(3):497-510. doi: 10.1007/s00267-008-9124-4. Epub 2008 May 17.
3
The Relationship Between Perceptions of Wilderness Character and Attitudes Toward Management Intervention to Adapt Biophysical Resources to a Changing Climate and Nature Restoration at Sequoia and Kings Canyon National Parks.红杉与国王峡谷国家公园中荒野特征认知与管理干预态度之间的关系,该管理干预旨在使生物物理资源适应气候变化并实现自然恢复。
Environ Manage. 2015 Sep;56(3):653-63. doi: 10.1007/s00267-015-0519-8. Epub 2015 Apr 25.
4
Landscape development, forest fires, and wilderness management.景观开发、森林火灾与荒野管理。
Science. 1974 Nov 8;186(4163):487-95. doi: 10.1126/science.186.4163.487.
5
Experiential benefits, place meanings, and environmental setting preferences between proximate and distant visitors to a national scenic trail.国家风景步道近距离和远距离游客之间的体验收益、场所意义及环境设置偏好。
Environ Manage. 2015 May;55(5):1109-23. doi: 10.1007/s00267-015-0445-9. Epub 2015 Jan 13.
6
Managing for recreational experience opportunities: the case of hikers in protected areas in Catalonia, Spain.管理休闲体验机会:以西班牙加泰罗尼亚保护区的徒步旅行者为例。
Environ Manage. 2011 Mar;47(3):482-96. doi: 10.1007/s00267-010-9606-z. Epub 2011 Feb 13.
7
Carrying capacity as "Informed Judgment": the values of science and the science of values.作为“明智判断”的承载能力:科学的价值与价值的科学。
Environ Manage. 2002 Aug;30(2):157-68. doi: 10.1007/s00267-002-2772-x.
8
Importance of Managing for Personal Benefits, Hedonic and Utilitarian Motivations, and Place Attachment at an Urban Natural Setting.在城市自然环境中管理个人利益、享乐主义和功利主义动机以及场所依恋的重要性。
Environ Manage. 2016 Sep;58(3):504-17. doi: 10.1007/s00267-016-0723-1. Epub 2016 Jul 1.
9
Valuing setting-based recreation for selected visitors to national forests in the southern United States.重视美国南部国家森林特定游客基于环境的娱乐活动。
J Environ Manage. 2016 Dec 1;183(Pt 3):972-979. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.09.050. Epub 2016 Sep 26.
10
A combined park management framework based on regulatory and behavioral strategies: use of visitors' knowledge to assess effectiveness.基于监管和行为策略的综合公园管理框架:利用游客知识评估有效性。
Environ Manage. 2001 Jul;28(1):61-73. doi: 10.1007/s002670010207.

本文引用的文献

1
A Developmental Guide to the Organisation of Close Relationships.亲密关系组织的发展指南。
Int J Behav Dev. 1997 Nov 1;21(4):747-770. doi: 10.1080/016502597384659.
2
Determinants of trust for public lands: fire and fuels management on the bitterroot national forest.
Environ Manage. 2009 Apr;43(4):571-84. doi: 10.1007/s00267-008-9230-3. Epub 2008 Nov 25.
3
Assessing the transactional nature of wilderness experiences: construct validation of the wilderness-hassles appraisal scale.评估荒野体验的交互性质:荒野困扰评估量表的结构效度验证。
Environ Manage. 2008 Sep;42(3):497-510. doi: 10.1007/s00267-008-9124-4. Epub 2008 May 17.
4
Commitment, pro-relationship behavior, and trust in close relationships.亲密关系中的承诺、促进关系的行为和信任。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1999 Nov;77(5):942-66. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.77.5.942.
5
Comparative fit indexes in structural models.结构模型中的比较拟合指数。
Psychol Bull. 1990 Mar;107(2):238-46. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.238.