Gerfen C R
J Comp Neurol. 1985 Jun 22;236(4):454-76. doi: 10.1002/cne.902360404.
Combined neuroanatomical techniques were used to examine the organization of the striatal projection to the substantia nigra in the rat. Both double anterograde axonal tracing methods (Phaseolus vulgaris leuco-agglutinin (PHA-L) and 3H-amino acid tract tracing) and double fluorescent retrograde axonal transport tracing methods were used to examine the relationship among striatal neurons projecting to separate areas of the substantia nigra. Additionally, the distributions of retrogradely labeled striatonigral projection neurons were charted relative to the neurochemically distinct striatal "patch" compartment, identified by substance P- or leu-enkephalin-like immunoreactivity, and the complementary "matrix" compartment, identified by somatostatin-like immunoreactive fibers. These studies show two distinct types of organization in the striatonigral projections. One type is topographic in that the mediolateral relationships among these striatal efferent neurons are roughly maintained by their termination patterns in the substantia nigra, while the dorsoventral relationships are inverted. Projections from any part of the striatum, however, are distributed throughout the rostrocaudal axis of the substantia nigra. Despite their general topographic organization, the variable and dispersed nature of such projections from individual striatal loci results in partial overlap of afferent fields from separate striatal areas. The second type of organization is nontopographic and provides a different system for convergence of inputs from separated striatal areas that is superimposed on the rough topographic system. In this other projection system the mediolateral and dorsoventral relationships typical of the topographically ordered system are not maintained and are sometimes reversed. For example, PHA-L injected into the dorsal striatum labels a topographic (inverted relationship) projection to the ventral substantia nigra pars reticulata but also a smaller and separate projection to the dorsal pars reticulata and adjacent pars compacta. Retrograde tracer deposits in the pars compacta label neurons in the ventral striatum (the inverted relationship) but also clusters of neurons in the dorsal striatum. These clusters are in the neurochemically defined patch compartment whereas neurons in the matrix are labeled by injections into the pars reticulata. The dendrites of both retrogradely filled patch and matrix neurons are confined to the compartment containing their cell bodies, suggesting a restriction that would functionally segregate extrinsic striatal afferents shown in other studies to be confined to either patches or matrix.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
采用联合神经解剖学技术研究大鼠纹状体向黑质投射的组织结构。运用两种双顺行轴突追踪方法(菜豆白细胞凝集素(PHA-L)和³H-氨基酸束路追踪)以及双荧光逆行轴突运输追踪方法,来研究投射至黑质不同区域的纹状体神经元之间的关系。此外,相对于通过P物质或亮脑啡肽样免疫反应性鉴定的神经化学上不同的纹状体“斑块”区室以及通过生长抑素样免疫反应性纤维鉴定的互补“基质”区室,绘制了逆行标记的纹状体黑质投射神经元的分布图。这些研究显示了纹状体黑质投射中两种不同类型的组织结构。一种类型是拓扑性的,即这些纹状体传出神经元之间的中外侧关系大致通过它们在黑质中的终末模式得以维持,而背腹侧关系则相反。然而,来自纹状体任何部位的投射分布于黑质的前后轴上。尽管它们具有一般的拓扑组织结构,但来自单个纹状体位点的这种投射的可变和分散性质导致来自不同纹状体区域的传入场部分重叠。第二种组织结构类型是非拓扑性的,它提供了一个不同的系统,用于汇聚来自分离的纹状体区域的输入,该系统叠加在大致的拓扑系统之上。在这个其他投射系统中,典型的拓扑有序系统的中外侧和背腹侧关系没有得到维持,有时甚至相反。例如,将PHA-L注入背侧纹状体,标记了一条向腹侧黑质网状部的拓扑性(反向关系)投射,但也标记了一条较小且独立的向背侧网状部和相邻致密部的投射。在致密部的逆行示踪剂沉积标记了腹侧纹状体中的神经元(反向关系),但也标记了背侧纹状体中的神经元簇。这些簇位于神经化学定义的斑块区室中,而基质中的神经元则通过注入网状部进行标记。逆行填充的斑块和基质神经元的树突均局限于包含其胞体的区室,这表明存在一种限制,在功能上会将其他研究中显示的外在纹状体传入纤维隔离在斑块或基质中。(摘要截于400字)