University of Nevada, Las Vegas, NV, USA.
J Interpers Violence. 2014 Jan;29(2):299-319. doi: 10.1177/0886260513505150. Epub 2013 Oct 20.
Evidence indicates an association between victimization and adolescent substance use, but the exact nature of this relationship remains unclear. Some research focuses solely on the consequences of experiencing indirect victimization (e.g., witnessing violence), others examine direct victimization (e.g., being personally victimized), and still others combine both forms of victimization without assessing the relative impact of each on substance use. Furthermore, many of these studies only assess these relationships in the short-term using cross-sectional data. This study uses data from the Project on Human Development in Chicago Neighborhoods (PHDCN) to explore the impact of experiencing only indirect victimization, only direct victimization, both forms of victimization, and no victimization on substance use at two time points during adolescence. We find that of those adolescents who are victimized, the majority experience indirect victimization only, followed by experiencing both forms of victimization, and experiencing direct victimization only. Each of the victimization experiences were associated with increased contemporaneous substance use, with the strongest effects for those experiencing multiple forms of violence. For all victims, however, the impact on substance use declined over time.
证据表明,受害与青少年物质使用之间存在关联,但这种关系的确切性质仍不清楚。一些研究仅关注间接受害(例如目睹暴力)的后果,另一些研究则考察直接受害(例如遭受人身伤害),还有一些研究则同时结合了这两种受害形式,而没有评估每种形式对物质使用的相对影响。此外,这些研究中的许多研究仅使用横截面数据在短期内评估这些关系。本研究使用来自芝加哥社区人类发展项目(PHDCN)的数据,探讨在青少年时期的两个时间点,仅经历间接受害、仅经历直接受害、同时经历两种受害形式和没有受害经历对物质使用的影响。我们发现,在那些受害的青少年中,大多数仅经历间接受害,其次是同时经历两种受害形式,最后是仅经历直接受害。每种受害经历都与当前物质使用的增加有关,而经历多种形式暴力的人影响最大。然而,对于所有受害者,其对物质使用的影响随时间推移而下降。