Cardiopulmonary and Metabolism Research Laboratory, Department of Kinesiology, The University of Toledo, Toledo, Ohio USA.
J Sports Sci Med. 2007 Mar 1;6(1):98-105. eCollection 2007.
Previous studies have reported women to have a greater resistance to fatigue than men during sustained handgrip exercise, however, observed gender differences in fatigue has been shown to be a function of contraction type. The purpose of the present study was to determine if gender differences exist in forearm muscle fatigue during intermittent handgrip contractions. Women [n = 11, 23.5 ± 1.5 (SE) yr] and men (n = 11, 24.1 ± 1.5 yr) performed intermittent isometric handgrip contractions at a target force of 50% of maximal voluntary contraction (MVC) for 5 s followed by 5 s rest until task failure. Rate of fatigue was calculated from MVCs taken every 2 min during exercise, and recovery of muscle strength was measured in 5 min increments until 45 min post-task failure. Forearm muscle strength was less for women than men (W: 341.5 ± 11.9 N; M: 480.2 ± 28.0 N; p ≤ 0.05). No gender difference was present in time to task failure (W: 793.3 ± 92.5 s; M: 684.8 ± 76.3 s) or in the decrease in muscle force generating capacity at task failure (W: -47.6 ± 1.0%; M: -49.9 ± 1.3%). Rate of muscle fatigue was found to be similar between women and men (W: -3.6 ± 0.5 %·min(-1); M: -4.3 ± 0.6 %·min(-1)) and no gender difference was found in the recovery of muscle strength following task failure. In summary, no gender difference was found in the fatigability of the forearm muscles during intermittent submaximal handgrip contractions, independent of muscle strength. Key pointsThe aim of the present study was to determine if gender differences exist in forearm muscle fatigue during intermittent isometric handgrip contractions.Both unmatched and matched for strength gender comparisons found women and men to exhibit a similar exercise tolerance, rate of fatigue, and recov-ery of handgrip force following repeated forearm muscle contractions.These results indicate that maximal handgrip strength is not a key determinant of exercise toler-ance during intermittent isometric forearm exercise performed at a moderate relative contraction inten-sity.
先前的研究报告表明,在持续的握力运动中,女性比男性更能抵抗疲劳,然而,观察到的疲劳性别差异是收缩类型的功能。本研究的目的是确定在间歇性握力收缩期间,前臂肌肉疲劳是否存在性别差异。女性[ n = 11,23.5 ± 1.5(SE)岁]和男性( n = 11,24.1 ± 1.5 岁)以 50%的最大自主收缩( MVC)的目标力进行间歇性等长握力收缩,持续 5 秒,然后休息 5 秒,直到任务失败。从运动中每 2 分钟进行的 MVC 计算疲劳率,并且在 45 分钟的任务失败后,以 5 分钟的增量测量肌肉力量的恢复情况。女性的前臂肌肉力量小于男性( W:341.5 ± 11.9 N; M:480.2 ± 28.0 N; p ≤ 0.05)。在任务失败时间( W:793.3 ± 92.5 s; M:684.8 ± 76.3 s)或任务失败时肌肉力量产生能力下降方面,性别之间没有差异( W:-47.6 ± 1.0%; M:-49.9 ± 1.3%)。发现女性和男性之间的肌肉疲劳率相似( W:-3.6 ± 0.5%·min(-1); M:-4.3 ± 0.6%·min(-1)),并且在任务失败后,肌肉力量的恢复方面没有性别差异。总之,在间歇性亚最大握力收缩期间,前臂肌肉的疲劳性没有性别差异,与肌肉力量无关。关键点本研究的目的是确定在间歇性等长握力收缩期间,前臂肌肉疲劳是否存在性别差异。无论是未匹配还是匹配力量的性别比较,均发现女性和男性在重复进行前臂肌肉收缩后的运动耐量、疲劳率和握力恢复方面表现出相似的运动能力。这些结果表明,在以适度相对收缩强度进行间歇性等长前臂运动期间,最大握力强度不是运动耐受的关键决定因素。